Re: [Ilugc] Query on 1000baseT/Full transfer speed

2015-01-13 Thread Arun Khan
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 11:11 AM, Balasubramaniam Natarajan wrote: > On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 5:19 PM, Arun Khan wrote: > >> The theoretical speed would be 1000Mbps/8 to get a 125 MBytes/sec >> number. However, when both are connected to a switch or a hub, >> sharing the ethernet fabric with othe

Re: [Ilugc] Query on 1000baseT/Full transfer speed

2015-01-13 Thread PrasannaKumar Muralidharan
> > I could not do UDP as I was mirroring a disk, More over data read and > write happens at more than 20MBPS, then why would it result in that low 4MB > ? Any way I did that painfully across 120GB over 6 hrs of time. > UDP does not have any overhead I think (not sure though). There can be protoc

Re: [Ilugc] Query on 1000baseT/Full transfer speed

2015-01-12 Thread Balasubramaniam Natarajan
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 5:19 PM, Arun Khan wrote: > The theoretical speed would be 1000Mbps/8 to get a 125 MBytes/sec > number. However, when both are connected to a switch or a hub, > sharing the ethernet fabric with other nodes, then there is a lot of > collision between nodes when they broadc

Re: [Ilugc] Query on 1000baseT/Full transfer speed

2015-01-12 Thread Balasubramaniam Natarajan
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 2:15 PM, PrasannaKumar Muralidharan < prasannatsmku...@gmail.com> wrote: > 100MegaBytes of raw speed is what you can expect. Please try with UDP, > don't read data from hard disk, also the amount of data sent per transfer > can affect the output. Use iperf (with udp) to see

Re: [Ilugc] Query on 1000baseT/Full transfer speed

2015-01-12 Thread sahil साहिल
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 9:37 PM, sahil साहिल wrote: > I hope writing may give you few dots which > may help you. > Obviously on Google or any other search engine. Sorry, i forgot to mention earlier. -- *Regards,Sahil ModGill* ___ ILUGC Mailing Lis

Re: [Ilugc] Query on 1000baseT/Full transfer speed

2015-01-12 Thread sahil साहिल
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 9:30 PM, Jassi wrote: > > My name is Jaswinder and I am going to work on a project called 'analysis > of WLAN hamdover (handoff) '. Can anyone suggest me which software should I > use for wireless LAN. I have heard that GNS3 works well for wired networks > and same is with

Re: [Ilugc] Query on 1000baseT/Full transfer speed

2015-01-12 Thread Jassi
Hello, My name is Jaswinder and I am going to work on a project called 'analysis of WLAN hamdover (handoff) '. Can anyone suggest me which software should I use for wireless LAN. I have heard that GNS3 works well for wired networks and same is with NS3 but They don't work for wireless LAN. I

Re: [Ilugc] Query on 1000baseT/Full transfer speed

2015-01-12 Thread Arun Khan
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 12:51 PM, Balasubramaniam Natarajan wrote: > > I have two system A and B connected with a LAN cable. Both of them were > made in the last one year so it does not matter if it is straight through > or cross over. > > When I tried to issue a ethtool eth0 I see that both mach

Re: [Ilugc] Query on 1000baseT/Full transfer speed

2015-01-12 Thread PrasannaKumar Muralidharan
100MegaBytes of raw speed is what you can expect. Please try with UDP, don't read data from hard disk, also the amount of data sent per transfer can affect the output. Use iperf (with udp) to see the real hardware capability. Hope this helps, PrasannaKumar _

[Ilugc] Query on 1000baseT/Full transfer speed

2015-01-11 Thread Balasubramaniam Natarajan
Hi I am confused by this Lan data speed. I have two system A and B connected with a LAN cable. Both of them were made in the last one year so it does not matter if it is straight through or cross over. When I tried to issue a ethtool eth0 I see that both machine are capable of supporting 1000ba

Re: [Ilugc] Query on eCos

2014-04-03 Thread அருண் குமார் - Arun Kumar
Good that your are trying something using eCos. http://ecos.sourceware.org/ > > I am "trying" to use it . But , not able to figure it out from the manual > , so a little bit stuck . > What kind of development board are you trying to use ? Thanks & Regards Arun ஃஃ

[Ilugc] Query on eCos

2014-04-03 Thread sibi kanagaraj
Hi all , I would like to know if any one has worked with or has first hand experience of eCos - a free open source real-time operating system intended for embedded applications . http://ecos.sourceware.org/ I am "trying" to use it . But , not able to figure it out from the manual , so a little

Re: [Ilugc] Query on licensing - Apache 2.0

2014-04-02 Thread sibi kanagaraj
Hi , Thanks a lot for the input . > > Best wishes, > > SK > > -- > Shakthi Kannan > http://www.shakthimaan.com > ___ > ILUGC Mailing List: > http://www.ae.iitm.ac.in/mailman/listinfo/ilugc > ILUGC Mailing List Guidelines: > http://ilugc.in/mailinglist-g

Re: [Ilugc] Query on licensing - Apache 2.0

2014-03-30 Thread Shakthi Kannan
Hi, --- On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 11:38 AM, sibi kanagaraj wrote: | In 2005, Hewlett-Packard and UNLV open-sourced and it is now freely | available under the Apache | 2.0license. \-- Good that they open sourced the code. --- | Most | notably, this

Re: [Ilugc] Query on licensing - Apache 2.0

2014-03-30 Thread sibi kanagaraj
> > That would invalidate the requirement that all Apache software must be > released under Apache 2.0 license? > > You can combine Apache and GPLv3 code in a project. Also read: > > http://www.apache.org/licenses/GPL-compatibility.html > > Upon reading this http://tesseract-ocr.repairfaq.org/ a

Re: [Ilugc] Query on licensing - Apache 2.0

2014-03-30 Thread Shakthi Kannan
Hi, --- On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 10:54 AM, sibi kanagaraj wrote: | Is it possible to take a code released under , Apache License, Version 2.0, | make modifications to it and release it under GPL V3 ? \-- That would invalidate the requirement that all Apache software must be released under Apache

[Ilugc] Query on licensing - Apache 2.0

2014-03-30 Thread sibi kanagaraj
Dear all , I have a query regarding licensing . Is it possible to take a code released under , Apache License, Version 2.0, make modifications to it and release it under GPL V3 ? -Sibi ___ ILUGC Mailing List: http://www.ae.iitm.ac.in/mailman/listinfo/i

Re: [Ilugc] query for kerberos

2014-02-05 Thread Ganesh Hariharan
Simple, easy to understand documentation at ubuntu site.. https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Kerberos best On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 1:49 PM, Arun Kumar Reddy wrote: > any one know kerberos configuration steps plz suggest me frnds.i am using > fedora 20thversion. >

Re: [Ilugc] query for kerberos

2014-02-05 Thread L. Guruprasad
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 1:49 PM, Arun Kumar Reddy wrote: > any one know kerberos configuration steps plz suggest me frnds.i am using > fedora 20thversion. http://www.lmgtfy.com/?q=kerberos+fedora+20 The results to look out for are the ones from the official Fedora documentation website. Thanks &

[Ilugc] query for kerberos

2014-02-05 Thread Arun Kumar Reddy
any one know kerberos configuration steps plz suggest me frnds.i am using fedora 20thversion. ___ ILUGC Mailing List: http://www.ae.iitm.ac.in/mailman/listinfo/ilugc ILUGC Mailing List Guidelines: http://ilugc.in/mailinglist-guidelines

Re: [Ilugc] query for Self certifying system and Real time example

2014-01-26 Thread Manokaran K
On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 12:44 PM, Arun Kumar Reddy wrote: > Dear All > > Any one give me what is the "Self certifying system" and how > it is work and where. then have any book for referenece plz send me the > link frnds and am doing hadoop based project so only asking this question

Re: [Ilugc] query for Self certifying system and Real time example

2014-01-26 Thread Girish Venkatachalam
On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 12:44 PM, Arun Kumar Reddy wrote: > Dear All > > Any one give me what is the "Self certifying system" and how > it is work and where. then have any book for referenece plz send me the > link frnds and am doing hadoop based project so only asking this question

[Ilugc] query for Self certifying system and Real time example

2014-01-25 Thread Arun Kumar Reddy
Dear All Any one give me what is the "Self certifying system" and how it is work and where. then have any book for referenece plz send me the link frnds and am doing hadoop based project so only asking this question.. give me Real time example plz... Regards Arun Kumar reddy _

Re: [Ilugc] Query: Tools for monitoring servers

2012-06-25 Thread Suraj Kumar
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 11:16 AM, K.C. Ramakrishna wrote: > > Hi all, > > We are trying to look into monitoring servers in Beta and Prod environments. > > The stack: > a. 2(more in future) Front End apache httpd/tomcat/Liferay Servers > b. Independent CAS-SSO and SOLR servers. > c. standalone serv

Re: [Ilugc] Query: Tools for monitoring servers

2012-06-25 Thread Rajagopal Swaminathan
Greetings, On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 11:16 AM, K.C. Ramakrishna wrote: > Hi all, > > We are trying to look into monitoring servers in Beta and Prod environments. > > The stack: > a. 2(more in future) Front End apache httpd/tomcat/Liferay Servers > b. Independent CAS-SSO and SOLR servers. > c. stand

Re: [Ilugc] Query: Tools for monitoring servers

2012-06-24 Thread Balasubramaniam Natarajan
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 11:16 AM, K.C. Ramakrishna wrote: > > > I have researched all the usual suspects: Cacti, Nagios, ZenOSS, Zabix?.. > JMX seems to be very popular for tomcat/Java. > > What are your recommendations for handling this scenario? What are the > pros and cons of various tools and

[Ilugc] Query: Tools for monitoring servers

2012-06-24 Thread K.C. Ramakrishna
Hi all, We are trying to look into monitoring servers in Beta and Prod environments. The stack: a. 2(more in future) Front End apache httpd/tomcat/Liferay Servers b. Independent CAS-SSO and SOLR servers. c. standalone server running webservices (written in Java) d. 2MySQL (Percona) servers 1 WRIT

Re: [Ilugc] Query abut external HDD

2011-11-18 Thread Rajagopal Swaminathan
Greetings, On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 6:50 PM, Kumar Appaiah wrote: > > My purpose in doing this is to automount an USB > drive. http://www.autofs.org has much information, but if you want to > mount it using a script, specify a script in the /etc/auto.master > file. For the scripts I adapted, I use

Re: [Ilugc] Query abut external HDD

2011-11-18 Thread Kumar Appaiah
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 06:26:52PM +0530, Rajagopal Swaminathan wrote: > On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 6:10 PM, Kumar Appaiah > wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 04:33:17PM +0530, Rajagopal Swaminathan wrote: > > How about using autofs? I'd write a script for autofs which would > > check, say the UUID,

Re: [Ilugc] Query abut external HDD

2011-11-18 Thread Rajagopal Swaminathan
Greetings, On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 6:10 PM, Kumar Appaiah wrote: > On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 04:33:17PM +0530, Rajagopal Swaminathan wrote: > How about using autofs? I'd write a script for autofs which would > check, say the UUID, and then automatically mount it. > > However, one thing I wouldn't k

Re: [Ilugc] Query abut external HDD

2011-11-18 Thread Kumar Appaiah
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 04:33:17PM +0530, Rajagopal Swaminathan wrote: > What steps are needed to ensure that a particular USB external HDD is > always mounted on a different mountpoint than /media/ and > one particular non-root user gets rw access to that drive. > > The 2TB drive has a NTFS parti

Re: [Ilugc] Query abut external HDD

2011-11-18 Thread Rajagopal Swaminathan
Greetings, On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 5:18 PM, Girish Venkatachalam wrote: > UUID? > Thanks for the quick response. But there comes the thing: does udevinfo gives us information of uuid? If so what rules should I write? Should I add an entry to the /etc/fstab? As this drive is to store as a back

Re: [Ilugc] Query abut external HDD

2011-11-18 Thread Girish Venkatachalam
UUID? On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 4:33 PM, Rajagopal Swaminathan wrote: > Greetings, > > What steps are needed to ensure that a particular USB external HDD is > always mounted on a different mountpoint than /media/ and > one particular non-root user gets rw access to that drive. > > The 2TB drive has

[Ilugc] Query abut external HDD

2011-11-18 Thread Rajagopal Swaminathan
Greetings, What steps are needed to ensure that a particular USB external HDD is always mounted on a different mountpoint than /media/ and one particular non-root user gets rw access to that drive. The 2TB drive has a NTFS partition with about 200GB of data in it. So formatting is out of question

Re: [Ilugc] Query

2011-07-03 Thread 0
> I have installed Ubuntu 10.04 LTS Version with dual booting with Windows 7 > Ultimate. > In windows i can use internet. But unable to brows in Ubuntu. Kindly help me. You need to provide us with more details, such as, - What do u use for internet, Wifi or LAN cable or USB modem ? - Do you see

[Ilugc] Query

2011-07-03 Thread Baskaran P. Sun
Dear friends I have installed Ubuntu 10.04 LTS Version with dual booting with Windows 7 Ultimate. In windows i can use internet. But unable to brows in Ubuntu. Kindly help me. P. Baskaran ___ ILUGC Mailing List: http://www.ae.iitm.ac.in/mailman/listinfo

Re: [Ilugc] Query about Pre-installed Operating system in official laptops

2011-01-23 Thread Arun SAG
Hi, On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 6:53 PM, mohi wrote: > > >When I looked to buy a branded laptop, I felt much bad that I can > customize > >a laptop *BUT* I MUST select a M$ operating system. And this really is > like > >forcing us to pay money even if we do not want to buy it. Is there any > talks >

Re: [Ilugc] Query about Pre-installed Operating system in official laptops

2011-01-23 Thread Rahul Sundaram
On 01/23/2011 01:36 AM, Pandian R wrote: > Its very rare these laptop companies comes without windows. It happens very > rarely. (i got vostro 1000 with freedos, I am searching for similar one. > Dell refuses to distribute it without OS, pointing out on OEM warranty blah > blah) http://harishpilla

Re: [Ilugc] Query about Pre-installed Operating system in official laptops

2011-01-23 Thread Vamsee Kanakala
On Sunday 23 January 2011 02:02 AM, steve wrote: > Hi > > On 01/23/2011 01:53 AM, steve wrote: >> I refuse to believe that one cannot find a vendor that provides the same in >> Chennai. >> > I was annoyed enough to do a quick search(*) and bury this myth of not being > able to find a linux laptop l

Re: [Ilugc] Query about Pre-installed Operating system in official laptops

2011-01-22 Thread steve
Hi On 01/23/2011 01:53 AM, steve wrote: > I refuse to believe that one cannot find a vendor that provides the same in > Chennai. > I was annoyed enough to do a quick search(*) and bury this myth of not being able to find a linux laptop locally. Here you go: http://delllaptopprice.com/index.php?

Re: [Ilugc] Query about Pre-installed Operating system in official laptops

2011-01-22 Thread steve
Hi, On 01/23/2011 01:36 AM, Pandian R wrote: > Its very rare these laptop companies comes without windows. It happens very > rarely. (i got vostro 1000 with freedos, I am searching for similar one. > Dell refuses to distribute it without OS, pointing out on OEM warranty blah > blah) > It amazing t

Re: [Ilugc] Query about Pre-installed Operating system in official laptops

2011-01-22 Thread Pandian R
Its very rare these laptop companies comes without windows. It happens very rarely. (i got vostro 1000 with freedos, I am searching for similar one. Dell refuses to distribute it without OS, pointing out on OEM warranty blah blah) On 22-Jan-2011 8:57 PM, "openbala" wrote: On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at

Re: [Ilugc] Query about Pre-installed Operating system in official laptops

2011-01-22 Thread openbala
On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 6:53 PM, mohi wrote: > Hello all, > > When I looked to buy a branded laptop, I felt much bad that I can customize > a laptop *BUT* I MUST select a M$ operating system. And this really is like > forcing us to pay money even if we do not want to buy it. Is there any talks > b

[Ilugc] Query about Pre-installed Operating system in official laptops

2011-01-22 Thread mohi
Hello all, When I looked to buy a branded laptop, I felt much bad that I can customize a laptop *BUT* I MUST select a M$ operating system. And this really is like forcing us to pay money even if we do not want to buy it. Is there any talks before this post or is there a way to buy a branded laptop

Re: [Ilugc] [Query] Is releasing source code madatory for binary released under BSD License?

2010-06-16 Thread Kenneth Gonsalves
On Thursday 17 June 2010 08:46:36 Mohan Sundaram wrote: > If you are releasing only binaries only and want to allow to be used free, > then it can also be a proprietary licence enabling free usage of the > binary. > agreed. there is no sense using BSD license for a binary only release release i

Re: [Ilugc] [Query] Is releasing source code madatory for binary released under BSD License?

2010-06-16 Thread Mohan Sundaram
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 9:51 PM, Ashish Bhatia wrote: > Dear LUG Members, > > Imagine I develop a software [not dependent on any library at all] and > I "release" binary under GNU GPL, now as I understand from the GPL, > anyone in public who has the binary can legally force me to provide > him/her

Re: [Ilugc] [Query] Is releasing source code madatory for binary released under BSD License?

2010-06-16 Thread Ramprasad Rajendran
On 16 June 2010 21:51, Ashish Bhatia wrote: > Dear LUG Members, > > Imagine I develop a software [not dependent on any library at all] and > I "release" binary under GNU GPL, now as I understand from the GPL, > anyone in public who has the binary can legally force me to provide > him/her the sourc

[Ilugc] [Query] Is releasing source code madatory for binary released under BSD License?

2010-06-16 Thread Ashish Bhatia
Dear LUG Members, Imagine I develop a software [not dependent on any library at all] and I "release" binary under GNU GPL, now as I understand from the GPL, anyone in public who has the binary can legally force me to provide him/her the source code in usable form. But imagine if the binary is rele

Re: [Ilugc] query

2010-03-25 Thread Ravi Jaya
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 8:57 PM, chidambaresan sakthi < chidambasak...@gmail.com> wrote: > Actually friends i also it will be get it when we googling that...why i > have > to post this means,i hope somebody work with that tool is in our group may > "kindly ", avoid top posting. :) -- Ravi Jaya

Re: [Ilugc] query

2010-03-25 Thread chidambaresan sakthi
Actually friends i also it will be get it when we googling that...why i have to post this means,i hope somebody work with that tool is in our group may guide simple and best thingsmay be sakthi throw the coding on clone detection i think,i know erlang based tool used to solve this type of redun

Re: [Ilugc] Query on Gromacs Installation

2010-03-25 Thread Suraj Kumar
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 12:04 PM, Gowriishankar Raju wrote: > > How to choose the Gromacs version to be install in Ubuntu? > Is any special Gromacs versions available for ubuntu? > And what is the purpose to install FFTW? > Shall i use the latest version of FFTW to install? > Should the versions o

Re: [Ilugc] query

2010-03-25 Thread Salvadesswaran P.S.
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 1:12 PM, Kenneth Gonsalves wrote: > On Thursday 25 Mar 2010 1:03:19 pm Shrinivasan T wrote: >> > IS anyone aware on erlang tools..please give information about that. >> >> I am aware of that by googling. >> Why cant you? >> > > how do you know he is not from China? I don't

Re: [Ilugc] query

2010-03-25 Thread Kenneth Gonsalves
On Thursday 25 Mar 2010 1:03:19 pm Shrinivasan T wrote: > > IS anyone aware on erlang tools..please give information about that. > > I am aware of that by googling. > Why cant you? > how do you know he is not from China? -- regards kg http://lawgon.livejournal.com __

Re: [Ilugc] query

2010-03-25 Thread Shrinivasan T
Hi, > > IS anyone aware on erlang tools..please give information about that. > I am aware of that by googling. Why cant you? -- Regards, T.Shrinivasan My experiences with Linux are here http://goinggnu.wordpress.com For Free and Open Source Jobs http://fossjobs.wordpress.com

[Ilugc] Query on Gromacs Installation

2010-03-24 Thread Gowriishankar Raju
Dear friends, I am using Ubuntu 9.10. I want to work on Gromacs. I have a query on installing the Gromacs on ubuntu. How to choose the Gromacs version to be install in Ubuntu? Is any special Gromacs versions available for ubuntu? And what is the purpose to install FFTW? Shall i use the latest versi

Re: [Ilugc] query

2010-03-24 Thread Girish Venkatachalam
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 7:13 PM, chidambaresan sakthi wrote: > IS anyone aware on erlang tools..please give information about that. > Erlang seems to be popular in IM (instant messaging world) and telecom domain. Jabber is implemented in Erlang. You can do a $ apt-cache search erlang couchdb-bi

[Ilugc] query

2010-03-24 Thread chidambaresan sakthi
IS anyone aware on erlang tools..please give information about that. -- Regards... Chidambaresan ___ ILUGC Mailing List: http://www.ae.iitm.ac.in/mailman/listinfo/ilugc

Re: [Ilugc] Query on CentOS

2010-03-24 Thread ம ஸ்ரீ ராமதாஸ்
On Tuesday 23 March 2010 12:12 AM, Gowriishankar Raju wrote: > I have installed CentOS 5.4v in my pc. ( Along with Windows XP - Dual Boot ) > After installation i cant access internet, even an ethernet card is > available. > I dont know to do to make internet connection.(Same problem i had faced >

Re: [Ilugc] Query on CentOS

2010-03-23 Thread sivakumar bharadhwaj
dear raju, this may be a very silly question to ask you - any way don't mind. have you given access rights to the user id - from which you are accessing from (hoping that you are trying it as one of the user and not as a root). if not - please change it. good day s.sivakumar ___

Re: [Ilugc] Query on CentOS

2010-03-23 Thread L.Guruprasad
Hi, Gowriishankar Raju wrote: Hi, I have tried to connect google. But its showing, "Address not found". What can i do now to clear this problem? What kind of an internet connection you have? You may need to setup the network connection before you can connect to and use the internet. Also do

Re: [Ilugc] Query on CentOS

2010-03-22 Thread Rajagopal Swaminathan
Greetings, On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 12:59 AM, Gowriishankar Raju wrote: > No. > It doesn't see the network card. > > What does >> a lspci -vv say ? >> First off, never top post. Second find the linux driver for your network card and install it. Post the lspci output so members can further look

Re: [Ilugc] Query on CentOS

2010-03-22 Thread Karthikeyan S
Please open up up a new terminal window and type the command, ifconfig. Please paste the results here. Karthik On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 2:23 AM, Immanuel Jeyaraj wrote: > I see you are so used to M$ Windozz that you are not sure what > others have told you. > > First, get some help in instal

Re: [Ilugc] Query on CentOS

2010-03-22 Thread Immanuel Jeyaraj
I see you are so used to M$ Windozz that you are not sure what others have told you. First, get some help in installing. (try install fest, attend lug meeting and get some help there. second, learn some basics like using the CLI, concepts of networking, etc. this will take you a long way in us

Re: [Ilugc] Query on CentOS

2010-03-22 Thread Gowriishankar Raju
Hi, I have tried to connect google. But its showing, "Address not found". What can i do now to clear this problem? On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 1:02 AM, benjamin wrote: > On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 12:49 AM, Gowriishankar Raju > wrote: > > Can you tell how to find the ip? > ifconfig > https://lists.

Re: [Ilugc] Query on CentOS

2010-03-22 Thread benjamin
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 12:49 AM, Gowriishankar Raju wrote: > Can you tell how to find the ip? ifconfig https://lists.tce.edu/pipermail/glugot/2005-March/000136.html > How can i ping the router and setup nameserver? ping http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Resolv.conf > First of all, I am fresher to

Re: [Ilugc] Query on CentOS

2010-03-22 Thread Gowriishankar Raju
No. It doesn't see the network card. On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 12:53 AM, sankarshan < sankarshan.mukhopadh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 12:12 AM, Gowriishankar Raju > wrote: > > Dear Friends, > > > > I have installed CentOS 5.4v in my pc. ( Along with Windows XP - Dual > Boot )

Re: [Ilugc] Query on CentOS

2010-03-22 Thread sankarshan
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 12:12 AM, Gowriishankar Raju wrote: > Dear Friends, > > I have installed CentOS 5.4v in my pc. ( Along with Windows XP - Dual Boot ) > After installation i cant access internet, even an ethernet card is > available. > I dont know to do to make internet connection.(Same prob

Re: [Ilugc] Query on CentOS

2010-03-22 Thread Gowriishankar Raju
Can you tell how to find the ip? How can i ping the router and setup nameserver? First of all, I am fresher to use the linux platform. So only i cant answer your queries. But i am a good learner. Teach me how to overcome this problem. Waiting for your reply. On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 12:42 AM, benj

Re: [Ilugc] Query on CentOS

2010-03-22 Thread benjamin
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 12:34 AM, Gowriishankar Raju wrote: > ya, its connected with cable. > While i am using the windows, i can able to browse the internet. > but on Linux, i cant access. > I dont know the real fault. > Please help me. First please ans these other questions by Shrini what is y

Re: [Ilugc] Query on CentOS

2010-03-22 Thread Gowriishankar Raju
ya, its connected with cable. While i am using the windows, i can able to browse the internet. but on Linux, i cant access. I dont know the real fault. Please help me. On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 12:28 AM, Shrinivasan T wrote: > Hi, > , > > > > I have installed CentOS 5.4v in my pc. ( Along with Wind

Re: [Ilugc] Query on CentOS

2010-03-22 Thread Shrinivasan T
Hi, , > > I have installed CentOS 5.4v in my pc. ( Along with Windows XP - Dual Boot ) > After installation i cant access internet, even an ethernet card is > available. > I dont know to do to make internet connection.(Same problem i had faced > while i installed RedHat) > Please give me suggestion

[Ilugc] Query on CentOS

2010-03-22 Thread Gowriishankar Raju
Dear Friends, I have installed CentOS 5.4v in my pc. ( Along with Windows XP - Dual Boot ) After installation i cant access internet, even an ethernet card is available. I dont know to do to make internet connection.(Same problem i had faced while i installed RedHat) Please give me suggestions to

Re: [Ilugc] query about virus attack on UNIX / LINUX environment

2009-09-18 Thread Common Man
>On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 12:29 PM, Girish Venkatachalam > wrote: > In general till date we have hardly seen any worm on UNIX. Though the > first worm by Robert Tappan Morris was using the finger program on > UNIX. ;) > Hi, What about Ramen worm, Devnull, L10n worm etc..? Common Man __

Re: [Ilugc] query about virus attack on UNIX / LINUX environment

2009-09-17 Thread Vamsee Kanakala
Immanuel wrote: Venkatraman S wrote: On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 5:17 PM, Immanuel wrote: So?? WTF is wrong with you. If someone wants to make money, are you gonna stop him and preach the bible. Come on bud, ego and greed are imp for survival. If it doesnt match your PoV, then just sod off.

Re: [Ilugc] query about virus attack on UNIX / LINUX environment

2009-09-17 Thread Kapil Hari Paranjape
Hello, On Thu, 17 Sep 2009, Girish Venkatachalam wrote: > Cryptography requires randomness in everything. Crypto alone cannot > solve security problems. I will take a different fork here from what Girish said and add that programs alone cannot ensure security for a computer system. A good system

Re: [Ilugc] query about virus attack on UNIX / LINUX environment

2009-09-17 Thread Immanuel
Venkatraman S wrote: > On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 5:17 PM, Immanuel wrote: > > So?? WTF is wrong with you. If someone wants to make money, are you gonna > stop him and preach the bible. > Come on bud, ego and greed are imp for survival. > > If it doesnt match your PoV, then just sod off. > Learn t

Re: [Ilugc] query about virus attack on UNIX / LINUX environment

2009-09-17 Thread Venkatraman S
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 5:06 PM, steve wrote: > > IMHO, in an abstact perverse and biased point of view windows itself is a > computer virus. :) > This statement was the worst thing that i have heard in the recent past which sucks the juice out of a squid. If Howard Moon had to hear this, he wou

Re: [Ilugc] query about virus attack on UNIX / LINUX environment

2009-09-17 Thread Venkatraman S
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 5:17 PM, Immanuel wrote: > It is simple. M$ has created a ecosystem around its windozzz... > Organizations like Mac-coffee, Cymentec survive on the ecosystem. If M$ > has to fix it they are in trouble with the ecosystem. In other words... > M$ gets the max of the market pi

Re: [Ilugc] query about virus attack on UNIX / LINUX environment

2009-09-17 Thread Immanuel
Girish Venkatachalam wrote: >> I hear that Windows has a backdoor hole which is a cause of all the >> problems. >> Can you expatiate it technically and why Win doesnt plug it? What is the >> fundamental premise which makes Linux/Unix not-virus-friendly? >> > Why Windows doesn't plug it? I am n

Re: [Ilugc] query about virus attack on UNIX / LINUX environment

2009-09-17 Thread steve
Hi, On 09/17/2009 04:39 PM, Venkatraman S wrote: On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 12:29 PM, Girish Venkatachalam< girishvenkatacha...@gmail.com> wrote: There are far more Windows users on earth than Linux/UNIX users. This fact will never change. I hear that Windows has a backdoor hole which is

Re: [Ilugc] query about virus attack on UNIX / LINUX environment

2009-09-17 Thread Girish Venkatachalam
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 4:39 PM, Venkatraman S wrote: >> There are far more Windows users on earth than Linux/UNIX users. >> >> This fact will never change. >> >> > I hear that Windows has a backdoor hole which is a cause of all the > problems. > Can you expatiate it technically and why Win doesnt

Re: [Ilugc] query about virus attack on UNIX / LINUX environment

2009-09-17 Thread Girish Venkatachalam
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 4:14 PM, Kenneth Gonsalves wrote: >> He  needs access to the addressbook. We have no such concept. > > I do not understand - I have an address book Virus writers will not bother about LDAP or some other format used by certain people. They want Outlook addressbook which ha

Re: [Ilugc] query about virus attack on UNIX / LINUX environment

2009-09-17 Thread Venkatraman S
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 12:29 PM, Girish Venkatachalam < girishvenkatacha...@gmail.com> wrote: > > There are far more Windows users on earth than Linux/UNIX users. > > This fact will never change. > > I hear that Windows has a backdoor hole which is a cause of all the problems. Can you expatiate i

Re: [Ilugc] query about virus attack on UNIX / LINUX environment

2009-09-17 Thread Kenneth Gonsalves
On Thursday 17 Sep 2009 12:44:48 pm Girish Venkatachalam wrote: > On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 12:34 PM, Kenneth Gonsalves > > wrote: > > On Thursday 17 Sep 2009 12:29:01 pm Girish Venkatachalam wrote: > >> In the Windoze world normally worms infect your computer to send mails > >> using your addressbo

Re: [Ilugc] query about virus attack on UNIX / LINUX environment

2009-09-17 Thread Girish Venkatachalam
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 12:34 PM, Kenneth Gonsalves wrote: > On Thursday 17 Sep 2009 12:29:01 pm Girish Venkatachalam wrote: >> In the Windoze world normally worms infect your computer to send mails >> using your addressbook contacts and send spam using SMTP. >> >> Such things can never happen on

Re: [Ilugc] query about virus attack on UNIX / LINUX environment

2009-09-17 Thread Kenneth Gonsalves
On Thursday 17 Sep 2009 12:29:01 pm Girish Venkatachalam wrote: > In the Windoze world normally worms infect your computer to send mails > using your addressbook contacts and send spam using SMTP. > > Such things can never happen on UNIX. why not - suppose the user is foolish enough to run his gui

Re: [Ilugc] query about virus attack on UNIX / LINUX environment

2009-09-16 Thread Girish Venkatachalam
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 4:43 PM, Selvakumar Rajeswaran wrote: > Hi all, > > Is there any concept of virus attack on UNIX / LINUX environment. > There are worms on UNIX. Cisco routers are known for attacks long ago that brought LANs down. Google for Mellissa , ILOVEU and many other worm attacks.

Re: [Ilugc] query about virus attack on UNIX / LINUX environment

2009-09-16 Thread Shakthi Kannan
Hi, Some thoughts below: --- On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 4:43 PM, Selvakumar Rajeswaran wrote: | Or, if UNIX / LINUX is robust enough that it cannot be attacked by virus, then what is the underlying framework (or technicalities | of LINUX) that makes it robust. \-- Openness. 1. One always uses F/O

[Ilugc] query about virus attack on UNIX / LINUX environment

2009-09-16 Thread Selvakumar Rajeswaran
Hi all, Is there any concept of virus attack on UNIX / LINUX environment. Or, if UNIX / LINUX is robust enough that it cannot be attacked by virus, then what is the underlying framework (or technicalities of LINUX) that makes it robust. Because, usually I see windows machines r easily attacked

Re: [Ilugc] query regarding ethtool

2008-06-12 Thread Bharathi Subramanian
On Thu, 12 Jun 2008, Balu manyam wrote: > > So i guess the summary will be that none of the tools are perfect :( > hey guys - from my exp - mii-tool is not capable of reporting correctly for > NICs linking at 1000mbps FD - ethtool can do that -- so yeah if all NICs > are ifconfig up'ed - ethtool

Re: [Ilugc] query regarding ethtool

2008-06-12 Thread Balu manyam
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 7:30 PM, Preetish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > This depends on how much support for the MII interface is present in the > NIC > > driver in use. I have come across drivers that do not implement MII > > completely and this mii-tool is unable to show you the correct link >

Re: [Ilugc] query regarding ethtool

2008-06-12 Thread Preetish
> This depends on how much support for the MII interface is present in the NIC > driver in use. I have come across drivers that do not implement MII > completely and this mii-tool is unable to show you the correct link status, > regardless of the interface status. > > Thus mii-tool's output does no

Re: [Ilugc] query regarding ethtool

2008-06-12 Thread Shuveb Hussain
Hi, On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 5:17 PM, Bharathi Subramanian < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > mii-tool will return correct link status, even if the eth0 is down. > But AFAIK it is not the case with ethtool. > This depends on how much support for the MII interface is present in the NIC driver in use.

Re: [Ilugc] query regarding ethtool

2008-06-12 Thread Bharathi Subramanian
On Thu, 12 Jun 2008, Preetish wrote: > > mii-tool will return correct link status, even if the eth0 is down. > > But AFAIK it is not the case with ethtool. > > so can this be considered as a bug ? Not sure. When interface is down, I am not getting any status info in the ethtool output and man pa

Re: [Ilugc] query regarding ethtool

2008-06-12 Thread Preetish
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 5:13 PM, Preetish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> mii-tool will return correct link status, even if the eth0 is down. >> But AFAIK it is not the case with ethtool. > > so can this be considered as a bug ? > This is somthing I found http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/6908

Re: [Ilugc] query regarding ethtool

2008-06-12 Thread Preetish
> > mii-tool will return correct link status, even if the eth0 is down. > But AFAIK it is not the case with ethtool. so can this be considered as a bug ? ___ To unsubscribe, email [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe " in the subject or body of the mess

Re: [Ilugc] query regarding ethtool

2008-06-12 Thread Bharathi Subramanian
On Thu, 12 Jun 2008, Preetish wrote: > > mii-tool is using the MII interface available in the HW. It is > > indenpent of the interface status. But ethtool might be using status > > avail in the driver itself (Not sure), which depends on the interface > > status. > > But is it not returning the wr

Re: [Ilugc] query regarding ethtool

2008-06-12 Thread Preetish
> mii-tool is using the MII interface available in the HW. It is > indenpent of the interface status. But ethtool might be using status > avail in the driver itself (Not sure), which depends on the interface > status. But is it not returning the wrong value ? __

Re: [Ilugc] query regarding ethtool

2008-06-11 Thread Bharathi Subramanian
On Thu, 12 Jun 2008, Preetish wrote: > Now if we do a 'service network stop' and then do a 'ethtool eth0' > then it gives a output Link detected: no > > Now 'mii-tool eth0' in both the cases gives the output as link ok mii-tool is using the MII interface available in the HW. It is indenpent of

[Ilugc] query regarding ethtool

2008-06-11 Thread Preetish
Hi There is a little confusion in my mind regarding the 'Link detected' part in the output of command 'ethtool eth0' . If the network is up then the command 'ethtool eth0' gives the output as Link detected: yes Now if we do a 'service network stop' and then do a 'ethtool eth0' then it gives a o

  1   2   >