A post on debian-security-announce finally talks about the post-mortem
of the recent server compromises.
http://lists.debian.org/debian-security-announce/debian-security-announce-2003/msg00212.html
Here is the abstract:
Recently multiple servers of the Debian project were compromised using a
Dear Ashwin,
nothing is to be paid. that's a very small contribution from my side for the upcoming
meet.
anyway! just for list junta info- today i happened to attend linux bangalore 2003
meet.
the schedules are here http://linux-bangalore.org/2003/schedules/. i think within 2-3
days we shud
http://www.lycoris.com/
couldn't help sharing this with you. i feel this a great choice for
large and rapid deployment, where organizations want 1:1 windoze to
linux migration, with support and branding and even OEM bundling etc.
(alok sinha, your kind of thing)
:-)
LL
Hi,
There is a LOCAL ROOT EXPLOIT in all 2.4 kernels before 2.4.23:
http://xrl.us/66p,
Compromised machine info:
http://xrl.us/65c
Exploit Advisory:
http://xrl.us/66p
Patch: http://xrl.us/67f
no new packages are being uploaded get more info at
http://www.wiggy.net/debian/
Hi!
Some issues regarding the SCo claim and the refusal of
IBM to indemnufy Linux user in case the outcome of sco
lawsuit is averse to open source community. Read Thsi
article
http://www.atnewyork.com/news/article.php/3114961
It appears to me that open source community is in the
midst of dirty
On Tue, 2003-12-02 at 11:11, Vipul Mathur wrote:
A post on debian-security-announce finally talks about the post-mortem
of the recent server compromises.
http://lists.debian.org/debian-security-announce/debian-security-announce-2003/msg00212.html
[snip]
horrid stuff this! but i don't know
LL == linuxlingam [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
LL On Mon, 2003-12-01 at 23:55, Raj Mathur wrote:
LL umm,... was just gonna tell you guys it is a great
LL illustration, but not a logo. these are two different
LL things. a logo is *not* an illustration. there are some strict
Dear Puneet,
Thanks, 3 CDs Mandrake 9.2 recd. Let me know offlist if anything is to be paid and how
to send it. If nil, then Thanks from all of us. I'll hand them over to Raju Mathur.
Regards, Ashwin
Dear all,
Mandrake 9.2 with me - thanks to Puneet. Should we distribute this in place of Red
On Tue, 2003-12-02 at 08:33, Raj Mathur wrote:
[snip]
before you get a true logo.
Which are...?
LL sigh! was trying to avoid this.
...which is why there exist irritating people like me to prod lazy
designers into creative diarrhoea :)
thanks, my dear isapgol.
Thanks,
___
ilugd mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
Hi all.
I just want to ask the concerned people if they
remember the ILUG dehradun logo that was posted to
this mailing list some time back.
That looked pretty neat.
Tux with just the text Linux users group, dehradun.
The URL might be somewhere in the archives.
Thank you.
Shehjar
I dont know if this was posted to the list earlier but Bruce
has a proposal up at userlinux.com
UserLinux: Repairing the Economic Paradigm of Enterprise Linux
Bruce Perens [EMAIL PROTECTED], Perens LLC
FIRST DRAFT: Please send corrections.
The Problem
Enterprise users have embraced GNU/Linux.
Hi!
Is there a java expert on our list. I have a few
queries regrding java (basically deals with java app
deployment on Linux and memory allocation).
If somebody is ready to answer them please answer me
off list.
with regards
vivek
=
When DESTINY has closed all the DOORS;
Jump out of the
whew! just finished a massive 117-slide openoffice presentation,
complete with images, graphics, text, animations.
openoffice impress rocks.
i do not see *any* reason why someone should be using powerless
pointless proprietory apps anymore, in my humble opinion.
one extremely cool
[Local root vulnerability in all 2.4 and 2.6 Linux kernels up to and
including 2.4.22. Please upgrade to a newer kernel, or get a kernel
with a backported fix from your distribution vendor -- Raju]
This is an RFC 1153 digest.
(1 message)
[Please upgrade if you use Net-SNMP on any platform -- Raju]
This is an RFC 1153 digest.
(1 message)
--
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Dear All,
For past few days, fetchmail on my linux box is giving problem. This is
the error that I receive:
-
fetchmail: 12 messages for [EMAIL PROTECTED] at
mail.net4india.com (460789 octets).
fetchmail: reading message 1 of 12 (2329 octets) fetchmail: timeout
after 300
On Wed, 2003-12-03 at 03:45, LinuxLingam wrote:
anybody from the win / mac domain wanna match this feature-to-feature?
50-paisa bet says you can't do this muft and mukt.
By very definition impossible to be muft and mukt in those domains.. ;-o
Yeah I also impressed a few of our in house
On Tue, 2003-12-02 at 23:29, Spoonman wrote:
Hello,
In the last meet I promised sudev and others that I will be
working with sudev's Openoffice persentations, towards giving
them more of a tutorial/bookish kind of look.
Since last week I was struggling with a bad hard
19 matches
Mail list logo
