Re: [ilugd] DRP: a quick poll

2005-09-14 Thread vivek khurana
--- Kenneth Gonsalves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wednesday 14 Sep 2005 11:02 pm, vivek khurana > wrote: > > but why? why you want to do a poll on backup and > why > > a poll on mailing list and not on main ilugd > website. > > i agree - mailing list is too unwieldy for a poll > (and this

Re: [ilugd] DRP: a quick poll

2005-09-14 Thread Kenneth Gonsalves
On Wednesday 14 Sep 2005 11:02 pm, vivek khurana wrote: >  but why? why you want to do a poll on backup and why > a poll on mailing list and not on main ilugd website. i agree - mailing list is too unwieldy for a poll (and this not a poll, but a questionaire). Put it up somewhere and put a link h

Re: [ilugd] DRP: a quick poll

2005-09-14 Thread Manish Sharma
In infinite wisdom vivek khurana proclaimed thus on Wednesday Sep 14, 2005 10:32: > > --- Manish Sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > Hello world, > > > > This is quick poll to understand how people prepare > > for crashes and rebuilding > > their systems to previous st

[ilugd] (fwd) [SECURITY] [DSA 811-1] New common-lisp-controller packages fix arbitrary code injection

2005-09-14 Thread Raj Mathur
[Please upgrade common-lisp-controller on all distributions -- Raju] This is an RFC 1153 digest. (1 message) -- Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Martin Schulze) Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: debian-securit

Re: [ilugd] DRP: a quick poll

2005-09-14 Thread vivek khurana
--- Manish Sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello world, > > This is quick poll to understand how people prepare > for crashes and rebuilding > their systems to previous state (configuration, > packages, setups etc.). > > Please do not let your responses be limited by the > questions asked.

[ilugd] DRP: a quick poll

2005-09-14 Thread Manish Sharma
Hello world, This is quick poll to understand how people prepare for crashes and rebuilding their systems to previous state (configuration, packages, setups etc.). Please do not let your responses be limited by the questions asked. Elaborate. I will try to summarize the replies for the list in r

Re: [ilugd] Load Balancing Apache Servers

2005-09-14 Thread Subhasis Ray
mod_backhand is an apache module and can run without much resource requirements. We configured mod_backhand on a dual PIII with 2GB of ram and this was also serving dynamic pages apart from running a MySQL server and some other in-house tools. Hence, in your case, a moderately good hardware wil

Re: [ilugd] Load Balancing Apache Servers

2005-09-14 Thread gaurav
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 ankush grover wrote: > > >Thanks everybody for ur replies. > >backhand only supports Apache1.x not Apache 2.x. > > >Thanks & Regards > checkout lvs (linux virtual server project -> http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/ ) or you can ultramonkey toolkit

Re: [ilugd] Load Balancing Apache Servers

2005-09-14 Thread Mithun Bhattacharya
--- ankush grover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What minimum requirements are needed in terms of hardware for Load > Balance(mod_backhand) with about 150-200 users accessing it at the > same time. I have no idea never used it myself - I cant imagine it being a too heavy module. I would say res

Re: [ilugd] Load Balancing Apache Servers

2005-09-14 Thread ankush grover
On 9/14/05, Mithun Bhattacharya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > --- ankush grover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 9/14/05, Mithun Bhattacharya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > http://www.backhand.org/ > > > > > > Thanks everybody for ur replies. > > > > backhand only supports Apache1.

Re: [ilugd] Load Balancing Apache Servers

2005-09-14 Thread Mithun Bhattacharya
--- ankush grover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 9/14/05, Mithun Bhattacharya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > http://www.backhand.org/ > > > Thanks everybody for ur replies. > > backhand only supports Apache1.x not Apache 2.x. The idea behind backhand is that you have a single apache instal

Re: [ilugd] Load Balancing Apache Servers

2005-09-14 Thread ankush grover
On 9/14/05, Mithun Bhattacharya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > --- ankush grover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > database.I am looking for a solution of Load Balancing Apache servers > > that > > is redirecting client requests to different Apache servers so that > > performance is good.I a

Re: [ilugd] Load Balancing Apache Servers

2005-09-14 Thread rantu
Hi ...Im using apache server in my organisation and is running fine with around 200 clients(Intranet appl.).In ur case i'll suggest you to host your application in more than one server if its a intranet application. If its a internet application than i'll suggest you to use DNAT at your gatewa

Re: [ilugd] Load Balancing Apache Servers

2005-09-14 Thread Mithun Bhattacharya
--- ankush grover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > database.I am looking for a solution of Load Balancing Apache servers > that > is redirecting client requests to different Apache servers so that > performance is good.I am using Fedora Core 3 . http://www.backhand.org/ ___

Re: [ilugd] Load Balancing Apache Servers

2005-09-14 Thread Manpreet Singh Nehra
ankush grover wrote: >Hey friends, > >I am working in a software company which develops software for the >Hospitals,Clinics etc.The application is developed in php with mysql as >database.I am looking for a solution of Load Balancing Apache servers that >is redirecting client requests to differ