On 8/1/07, Gora Mohanty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Decent 500GB IDE drives are going for about Rs. 5K, which takes care of
> 8-10 months of storage. If you really care for the data, buy two, and
> make a software RAID array out of them.
Agreed. In fact I would suggest that you make the 500GB RAI
--- Linux Lingam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> after a few days, reconnected the drive today.
> it made some grunting noises that alarmed me,
> and sure enough, folders and files are missing, or
> icons changed.
> unmounting it safely does not work anymore. 'df'
> shows me the device
> is unmo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Linux Lingam wrote:
> what are the best options for backing up 40 to 60 gb of data per month?
> dvd discs have come down in price, but some of the data-files are
> individually larger than 10gb (home video) and cutting and storing
> sliced versions ac
On 8/1/07, Gora Mohanty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-08-01 at 02:14 +0530, Linux Lingam wrote:
> > dear all,
> >
> > what are the best options for backing up 40 to 60 gb of data per month?
> [...]
>
> Decent 500GB IDE drives are going for about Rs. 5K, which takes care of
> 8-10 months
On Wed, 2007-08-01 at 02:14 +0530, Linux Lingam wrote:
> dear all,
>
> what are the best options for backing up 40 to 60 gb of data per month?
[...]
Decent 500GB IDE drives are going for about Rs. 5K, which takes care of
8-10 months of storage. If you really care for the data, buy two, and
make a
--- Linux Lingam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> dear all,
>
> what are the best options for backing up 40 to 60 gb
> of data per month?
> dvd discs have come down in price, but some of the
> data-files are
> individually larger than 10gb (home video) and
> cutting and storing
> sliced versions acr
dear all,
what are the best options for backing up 40 to 60 gb of data per month?
dvd discs have come down in price, but some of the data-files are
individually larger than 10gb (home video) and cutting and storing
sliced versions across discs is rather inelegant.
hard-disks have come down to app
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
,--[ On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 07:47:10PM +0530, Debarshi 'Rishi' Ray wrote:
| >> Which version of RPM and Yum are you using?
|
| > $ rpm -q yum
| >
| > yum-3.2.1-1.fc7
|
| You should consider updating to yum-3.2.2-3. There were a lot of
| bugfixes rec
>> Which version of RPM and Yum are you using?
> $ rpm -q yum
>
> yum-3.2.1-1.fc7
You should consider updating to yum-3.2.2-3. There were a lot of
bugfixes recently.
Cheers,
Debarshi
--
GPG key ID: 63D4A5A7
Key server: pgp.mit.edu
___
ilugd mailingli
>
> Did you try connecting your device to a machine which
> has usb 2.0 based bus ? Try connecting to a non legacy
> hardware, your drive could be in pretty much good
> shape or may require repartitioning at max.
Thanks vivek for the response.
alas! i just got fedup with the whole thing, decided
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
,--[ On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 03:36:45PM +0530, Sankarshan Mukhopadhyay wrote:
| -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
| Hash: SHA1
|
| आशीष शुक्ल Ashish Shukla wrote:
|
| > I'm running Fedora 7 on AMD64 architecture CPU and installed a package
| > "free
On Tue, 2007-07-31 at 01:22 +0530, Linux Lingam wrote:
> > Sudev Barar wrote:
> > > On 27/07/07, Andrew Michael Lynn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >> I will set it up again. Maybe we can have a comparison of various
> > >> other digital library software at the next ILUGD meet. ??
>
> welcome to t
Hi,
Sorry for the delay in sending this out, though all registered
members for whom we had a valid mailing address should have
received a paper notification of the annual general body meeting
of the ILUG-Delhi society.
The meeting will be held at 2pm, Sun., 5th Aug., at the JNU
Bio-Informatic
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
आशीष शुक्ल Ashish Shukla wrote:
> I'm running Fedora 7 on AMD64 architecture CPU and installed a package
> "freeciv" via "yum". "freeciv" requires "libSDL_mixer-1.2.so.0()(64bit)"
> which no package currently provides it on my system. So my question i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
,--[ On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 03:11:38PM +0530, Debarshi 'Rishi' Ray wrote:
| > I'm running Fedora 7 on AMD64 architecture CPU and installed a package
| > "freeciv" via "yum". "freeciv" requires "libSDL_mixer-1.2.so.0()(64bit)"
| > which no package curr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
,--[ On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 03:05:32PM +0530, Sankarshan Mukhopadhyay wrote:
|
[...]
| Can you check a yum deplist for freeciv along with yum provides
| libSDL_mixer-1.2.so.0 ? Is this related to some particular repository
| you have added ?
I've
> I'm running Fedora 7 on AMD64 architecture CPU and installed a package
> "freeciv" via "yum". "freeciv" requires "libSDL_mixer-1.2.so.0()(64bit)"
> which no package currently provides it on my system. So my question is,
> why 'rpm' installed a package without installing all its dependencies ?
> O
--- Linux Lingam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> bought a 120gb usb-ide external hardisk last month.
> formatted it with the fat32 filesystem, connected it
> to my ubuntu feisty, and
> backed up some heavy files on it.
> at the end of each session, ensured i properly
> unmounted it before
> disconne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
आशीष शुक्ल Ashish Shukla wrote:
> I'm running Fedora 7 on AMD64 architecture CPU and installed a package
> "freeciv" via "yum". "freeciv" requires "libSDL_mixer-1.2.so.0()(64bit)"
> which no package currently provides it on my system. So my question i
Kenneth Gonsalves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> microsoft has a very clearly thought out strategy with regard to
> 'piracy' - hook em on the illegal stuff, and after they are hooked,
> get em to pay. Which is why they dont raid educational institutions,
> computer training institutes and pr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I'm running Fedora 7 on AMD64 architecture CPU and installed a package
"freeciv" via "yum". "freeciv" requires "libSDL_mixer-1.2.so.0()(64bit)"
which no package currently provides it on my system. So my question is,
why 'rpm' installed a package w
On 31-Jul-07, at 12:35 PM, PJ wrote:
> Henry Chesbrough has an insightful look at why piracy is generally
> good for MS
> in India.
microsoft has a very clearly thought out strategy with regard to
'piracy' - hook em on the illegal stuff, and after they are hooked,
get em to pay. Which is w
On 31-Jul-07, at 10:31 AM, Raj Mathur wrote:
> What do you folks think of this? MS is planning to submit 2
> licenses to
> the OSI for approval as Open Source licences.
great news - interesting to see whether:
1. if the licenses are returned for rectification, whether MS will
rectify them
On 7/31/07, Shiv <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Raj Mathur writes:
>
> >
> > What do you folks think of this? MS is planning to submit 2 licenses to
> > the OSI for approval as Open Source licences. /
>
> Hi,
> Looking further, it appears that there is a whole website/blog dedicated to
> Open
Raj Mathur writes:
>
> What do you folks think of this? MS is planning to submit 2 licenses to
> the OSI for approval as Open Source licences. /
Hi,
Looking further, it appears that there is a whole website/blog dedicated to
Opensource at M$ called Port25 (http://port25.technet.com). The
http://www.businessweek.com/innovate/content/jul2007/id20070725_504325.htm?campaign_id=yhoo
Henry Chesbrough has an insightful look at why piracy is generally good for MS
in India.
I suspect most of the people on the mailing list knew it already, and see it
as the main reason why linux has been r
26 matches
Mail list logo
