Re: [ilugd] Fwd: Change of timezone City for India

2008-07-02 Thread Arun Khan
On Thursday 03 Jul 2008, Kenneth Gonsalves wrote: > On 03-Jul-08, at 9:57 AM, Goldwyn Rodrigues wrote: > >> ps - I posted a dissenting mail to the timezone list > > > > Appreciate that :) > > and I would have appreciated it more if you had posted your request > for comments to all major lug lists -

Re: [ilugd] Fwd: Change of timezone City for India

2008-07-02 Thread Goldwyn Rodrigues
On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 10:15 AM, Kenneth Gonsalves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 03-Jul-08, at 9:57 AM, Goldwyn Rodrigues wrote: > >>> ps - I posted a dissenting mail to the timezone list >> >> Appreciate that :) > > and I would have appreciated it more if you had posted your request > for comm

Re: [ilugd] Fwd: Change of timezone City for India

2008-07-02 Thread Kenneth Gonsalves
On 03-Jul-08, at 9:57 AM, Goldwyn Rodrigues wrote: >> ps - I posted a dissenting mail to the timezone list > > Appreciate that :) and I would have appreciated it more if you had posted your request for comments to all major lug lists - still not too late for that -- regards Kenneth Gonsalv

Re: [ilugd] Fwd: Change of timezone City for India

2008-07-02 Thread Goldwyn Rodrigues
On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 9:14 AM, Kenneth Gonsalves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 03-Jul-08, at 8:57 AM, Goldwyn Rodrigues wrote: > >> On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 8:06 AM, Arun Khan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> On Thursday 03 Jul 2008, Goldwyn Rodrigues wrote: >>> Kolkata AFAIK, is listed becau

Re: [ilugd] Fwd: Change of timezone City for India

2008-07-02 Thread Kenneth Gonsalves
On 03-Jul-08, at 8:57 AM, Goldwyn Rodrigues wrote: > On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 8:06 AM, Arun Khan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Thursday 03 Jul 2008, Goldwyn Rodrigues wrote: >> >>> Kolkata AFAIK, is listed because Calcutta Standard Time during the >>> British Raj was GMT+5:30. This has been abol

Re: [ilugd] Fwd: Change of timezone City for India

2008-07-02 Thread Goldwyn Rodrigues
On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 8:06 AM, Arun Khan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thursday 03 Jul 2008, Goldwyn Rodrigues wrote: > >> Kolkata AFAIK, is listed because Calcutta Standard Time during the >> British Raj was GMT+5:30. This has been abolished after unification >> of India. > > British raj was ov

Re: [ilugd] Fwd: Change of timezone City for India

2008-07-02 Thread Arun Khan
On Thursday 03 Jul 2008, Goldwyn Rodrigues wrote: > Kolkata AFAIK, is listed because Calcutta Standard Time during the > British Raj was GMT+5:30. This has been abolished after unification > of India. British raj was over in 1947. How did Calcutta show up in Linux time zone data? Is it possibl

Re: [ilugd] Fwd: Change of timezone City for India

2008-07-02 Thread Goldwyn Rodrigues
On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 7:09 PM, Sandip Bhattacharya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +++ Kenneth Gonsalves [02/07/08 17:58 +0530]: >>changed to Chennai according to your logic. All you are doing is >>fanning the flames of regionalism, chauvinism, confucianism and god >>knows what else. For heaven's sak

Re: [ilugd] Fwd: Change of timezone City for India

2008-07-02 Thread Goldwyn Rodrigues
On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 5:57 PM, "Sankarshan (সঙ্কর্ষণ)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Goldwyn Rodrigues wrote: > >> I am forwarding a mail I sent to timezone mailing list sometime back. >> I should have first discussed this on the ilugd list, but it is still >> not late. > > Given that you have alre

Re: [ilugd] Fwd: Change of timezone City for India

2008-07-02 Thread Subhodip Biswas
hi ! +1 to kenneth if not broken why fix ? simple waste of time -- Regards Subhodip Biswas Fedora Ambassador West Bengal , India GPG key : FAEA34AB Server : pgp.mit.edu http://subhodipbiswas.wordpress.com http:/www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/SubhodipBiswas ___

Re: [ilugd] Fwd: Change of timezone City for India

2008-07-02 Thread Sandip Bhattacharya
+++ Kenneth Gonsalves [02/07/08 17:58 +0530]: >changed to Chennai according to your logic. All you are doing is >fanning the flames of regionalism, chauvinism, confucianism and god >knows what else. For heaven's sake leave this alone and go do >something useful. I concur. The country is in t

Re: [ilugd] Fwd: Change of timezone City for India

2008-07-02 Thread Tanveer Singh
On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 6:00 PM, Kenneth Gonsalves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 02-Jul-08, at 5:47 PM, Goldwyn Rodrigues wrote: > >> Logically yes, but not with respect to popularity. Timezone package >> contains major cities of the timezone rather than the city/suburb of >> the correct meridia

Re: [ilugd] Fwd: Change of timezone City for India

2008-07-02 Thread Sankarshan (সঙ্কর্ষণ)
Goldwyn Rodrigues wrote: > I am forwarding a mail I sent to timezone mailing list sometime back. > I should have first discussed this on the ilugd list, but it is still > not late. Given that you have already posted to the tz mailing list, what do you hope to achieve by posting it to the LUG-D l

Re: [ilugd] Fwd: Change of timezone City for India

2008-07-02 Thread Kenneth Gonsalves
On 02-Jul-08, at 5:47 PM, Goldwyn Rodrigues wrote: > Logically yes, but not with respect to popularity. Timezone package > contains major cities of the timezone rather than the city/suburb of > the correct meridian. eg, CET/CEST. > I wish to propose to change the city to Delhi from Kolkata. I pr

Re: [ilugd] Fwd: Change of timezone City for India

2008-07-02 Thread Kenneth Gonsalves
On 02-Jul-08, at 5:41 PM, Goldwyn Rodrigues wrote: > I am looking from the perspective of a newbie who is doing his first > installation, and sets his timezone as India. (S)he tries to find > Delhi on the drop down list but fails to find it, and probably later > resorts to the map. Yes, (S)he doe

Re: [ilugd] Fwd: Change of timezone City for India

2008-07-02 Thread Goldwyn Rodrigues
On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 4:13 PM, Arun Khan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wednesday 02 Jul 2008, Goldwyn Rodrigues wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I am forwarding a mail I sent to timezone mailing list sometime back. >> I should have first discussed this on the ilugd list, but it is still >> not late. >> >> I

Re: [ilugd] Fwd: Change of timezone City for India

2008-07-02 Thread Goldwyn Rodrigues
On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 4:07 PM, Tanveer Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 4:08 PM, Kenneth Gonsalves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> On 02-Jul-08, at 3:37 PM, Goldwyn Rodrigues wrote: >> >>> 1. Legacy Calcutta Standard Time used during the British carried over >>> 2. Delhi

Re: [ilugd] Fwd: Change of timezone City for India

2008-07-02 Thread Arun Khan
On Wednesday 02 Jul 2008, Goldwyn Rodrigues wrote: > Hi, > > I am forwarding a mail I sent to timezone mailing list sometime back. > I should have first discussed this on the ilugd list, but it is still > not late. > > I don't mean to introduce a geographical divide, but just want the > timezone pa

Re: [ilugd] Fwd: Change of timezone City for India

2008-07-02 Thread Tanveer Singh
On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 4:08 PM, Kenneth Gonsalves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 02-Jul-08, at 3:37 PM, Goldwyn Rodrigues wrote: > >> 1. Legacy Calcutta Standard Time used during the British carried over >> 2. Delhi stands very close to Dili in pronunciation and spelling, and >> can be confusing

Re: [ilugd] Fwd: Change of timezone City for India

2008-07-02 Thread Kenneth Gonsalves
On 02-Jul-08, at 3:37 PM, Goldwyn Rodrigues wrote: > 1. Legacy Calcutta Standard Time used during the British carried over > 2. Delhi stands very close to Dili in pronunciation and spelling, and > can be confusing. If it aint broken why fix it? -- regards Kenneth Gonsalves Associate, NRC-FOS

[ilugd] Fwd: Change of timezone City for India

2008-07-02 Thread Goldwyn Rodrigues
Hi, I am forwarding a mail I sent to timezone mailing list sometime back. I should have first discussed this on the ilugd list, but it is still not late. I don't mean to introduce a geographical divide, but just want the timezone package to be "politically correct". Your views are welcome, and c