Re: [ilugd] Important : In support of Raj Thackeray...

2008-10-23 Thread shantanu goel
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 8:50 AM, Raj Mathur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Friday 24 Oct 2008, sumit...left d stone age. wrote: >> Dear Ballu bhai >> After all the 'Raj Thackeray issue', I have realised that we should >> support him in the following ways please read this and spread >> this

Re: [ilugd] Important : In support of Raj Thackeray...

2008-10-23 Thread Pradeepto Bhattacharya
Hi, On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 8:50 AM, Raj Mathur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Friday 24 Oct 2008, sumit...left d stone age. wrote: >> After all the 'Raj Thackeray issue', I have realised that we should >> support him in the following ways please read this and spread >> this message acros

Re: [ilugd] [OT] The Google Cookie Conspiracy

2008-10-23 Thread Pradeepto Bhattacharya
Hi, On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 12:05 AM, Sudhanwa Jogalekar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Pradeepto has given a very nice explanation. > > However, in the legal scenerio, refering to Indian IT act 2000, > unfortunately the term hacker or hacking is taken in the wrong sense. Yes, sadly its

Re: [ilugd] Important : In support of Raj Thackeray...

2008-10-23 Thread Raj Mathur
On Friday 24 Oct 2008, sumit...left d stone age. wrote: > After all the 'Raj Thackeray issue', I have realised that we should > support him in the following ways please read this and spread > this message across the country. Use the power of forwarding > mails today!!! * Very interesti

[ilugd] Important : In support of Raj Thackeray...

2008-10-23 Thread sumit...left d stone age.....
Dear Ballu bhai After all the 'Raj Thackeray issue', I have realised that we should support him in the following ways please read this and spread this message across the country. Use the power of forwarding mails today!!! * **We all should support Raj Thackeray and take

Re: [ilugd] [OT] The Google Cookie Conspiracy

2008-10-23 Thread Chirag Anand
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 12:05 AM, Sudhanwa Jogalekar <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > > Pradeepto has given a very nice explanation. > > However, in the legal scenerio, refering to Indian IT act 2000, > unfortunately the term hacker or hacking is taken in the wrong sense. > > This is what it says: >

Re: [ilugd] [OT] The Google Cookie Conspiracy

2008-10-23 Thread Sudhanwa Jogalekar
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 11:55 AM, narendra sisodiya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Totally agree with Pradeepto. How come some one give a certification and say > "*go my boy you are now allowed for ethical hacking*™ ", worse part is > redefining hacking. Pradeepto has given a very nice explanation.

[ilugd] How to see , what svn updates are available using

2008-10-23 Thread Mani A
"narendra sisodiya" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > In cvs , suppose I want to see what updates are available , I need to type > cvs -nq update > (want to see update, and not download them) > .. > But I want similar functionality in svn, svn help list svn help plist Best A. Mani -- A. Mani Member, C

Re: [ilugd] The Google Cookie Conspiracy

2008-10-23 Thread amar akshat
Hi all, I was wondering today that my notion about "Network Security" and Ethics in Hacking were almost the same. But after a healthy discussion hereby and Pradeepto's Genuine arguments I realize that i was perhaps wrong. I had in my schedule of CEH with EC-Council gone through modules like "SQL I

Re: [ilugd] How to see, what svn updates are available using command line..

2008-10-23 Thread Kartik Mistry
2008/10/23 "narendra sisodiya" wrote: > In cvs , suppose I want to see what updates are available , I need to type > cvs -nq update > (want to see update, and not download them) > .. > But I want similar functionality in svn, Do: svn stat -u Reference: http://svn.collab.net/repos/svn/trunk/doc/

Re: [ilugd] How to see , what svn updates are available using command line..

2008-10-23 Thread Nandeep Mali
Also following links might help: [1] A CVS to SVN migration guide: http://svn.collab.net/repos/svn/trunk/doc/user/cvs-crossover-guide.html [2] A lot on SVN: http://subversion.tigris.org/faq.html ___ ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org http:

Re: [ilugd] How to see , what svn updates are available using command line..

2008-10-23 Thread narendra sisodiya
Thanks u very much, You solved my problem,, ___ ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux

Re: [ilugd] How to see , what svn updates are available using command line..

2008-10-23 Thread Nandeep Mali
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 4:53 PM, shantanu goel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 4:50 PM, narendra sisodiya > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> But I want similar functionality in svn, >> So that i can see what updates are available... >> any pointer... > > svn --show-updates Actual

Re: [ilugd] How to see , what svn updates are available using command line..

2008-10-23 Thread shantanu goel
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 4:50 PM, narendra sisodiya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > But I want similar functionality in svn, > So that i can see what updates are available... > any pointer... svn --show-updates -- I didn't do it, nobody saw me do it, U can't prove anything - Bart S

[ilugd] How to see , what svn updates are available using command line..

2008-10-23 Thread narendra sisodiya
In cvs , suppose I want to see what updates are available , I need to type cvs -nq update (want to see update, and not download them) .. But I want similar functionality in svn, So that i can see what updates are available... any pointer... ___ ilugd mai

Re: [ilugd] The Google Cookie Conspiracy

2008-10-23 Thread narendra sisodiya
> > > Regds > Amar Akshat > (No more a Certified Ethical Hacker) > > Congrats ___ ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi http://

Re: [ilugd] software patents

2008-10-23 Thread narendra sisodiya
Read it > * This issue came with rightmost as This issue came with algorithms and then software, and now it came with "software over embedded hardware as > one unit" and I predict ... ___ ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org http://frodo.h

Re: [ilugd] software patents

2008-10-23 Thread narendra sisodiya
+1 Sandip, Following are not my thoughts, if you read about the issue,, you can find them them somewhere. But I strongly believe in these lines. --- *If you go to the fact and figure (As Venky told in meeting) , revenue goes in the hand of inventor is very fraction

Re: [ilugd] The Google Cookie Conspiracy

2008-10-23 Thread PJ
amar akshat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I had attached the paper in my second mail only. The paper is there attached > in the thread it self.! Even thats ambigious because my conference starts > tomoro only. > If u want i can repost the paper as attachment.! (Aside: Please use a spellchecker be

Re: [ilugd] The Google Cookie Conspiracy

2008-10-23 Thread Kartik Mistry
2008/10/23 "amar akshat": > From: "amar akshat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > The biggest de-facto difference between AF and us is that we are just > theoretical in all concepts AF is proff.! AF is AH. -- Cheers, Kartik Mistry | 0xD1028C8D | IRC: kart_ Homepage: people.debian.org/~kartik Blog.en:

Re: [ilugd] software patents

2008-10-23 Thread Sandip Bhattacharya
On Thursday 23 October 2008 10:09:04 Saurabh Nanda wrote: > Whoever wants to argue about the efficacy of software patents should > make it a point to read this essay by Paul Graham before forming & > voicing strong opinions: > > http://www.paulgraham.com/softwarepatents.html > Nice arguments, but

Re: [ilugd] [OT] The Google Cookie Conspiracy

2008-10-23 Thread Chirag Anand
I agree with pradeepto that many people do not know the meaning of hacking...but i guess its not their fault, even i did not. I got to know about it after i started using linux and got to know about things like kernel hacking etc. I think it's our duty to spread the knowledge... ;) -- anything w

Re: [ilugd] The Google Cookie Conspiracy

2008-10-23 Thread amar akshat
Sankarshan sir, I had attached the paper in my second mail only. The paper is there attached in the thread it self.! Even thats ambigious because my conference starts tomoro only. If u want i can repost the paper as attachment.! Regds Amar Akshat (No more a Certified Ethical Hacker) On Thu, Oct