On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 1:58 PM, Anoop John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 10:32 AM, Sankarshan Mukhopadhyay wrote:
> > did you get the RHEL3 one working on Fedora 8 ?
>
> Yes I did get the application running on Fedora 8 and the user tested
> the application for basic funct
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 10:32 AM, Sankarshan Mukhopadhyay wrote:
> did you get the RHEL3 one working on Fedora 8 ?
Yes I did get the application running on Fedora 8 and the user tested
the application for basic functionalities. I have not heard back from
the company and I believe they will contac
in infinite wisdom Dinesh Shah spoke thus On 04/13/2008 09:55 PM:
> What the kernel version has to do with running a program? It is the
> libraries that matter while running any binary. Some posters here has
> already asked the OP to run ldd and find the library dependencies.
There might be subt
Harish Pillay wrote:
>> If you have a distro and your program which is LSB compliant you will not
>> see much problems.
>
> Yes, that is what LSB has helped achieve.
not completely though. the LSB Application Testing suite checks for
symbol usage across what can be called the "highest common
> > I guess RHEL 3 is kernel 2.4.X whereas RHEL 4 is 2.6.X.
> > Don't know how a binary from 2.4 will run "just like that" on 2.6; if you
> > have source you can definitely port it to 2.6.
> > So in this case Centos 3 would be the best alternative, as suggested by
> > Raj
> > (Shekhar).
>
>
Dinesh Shah wrote:
> What the kernel version has to do with running a program? It is the
> libraries that matter while running any binary. Some posters here has
> already asked the OP to run ldd and find the library dependencies.
there are a few applications which do require specific kernel versi
Anoop John wrote:
> I had a request recently from a firm in Trivandrum to try to set up
> their software (Altair Hyperworks) on RHEL 3. I took fedora, assuming
> that if it worked on RHEL it would on fedora too, and with some minor
> tweaks in the installation script I was able to set it up on Fedo
Dear Vikas,
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 10:16 AM, Vikas Upadhyay <> wrote:
> > Centos is the closest relative to rhel, not fedora. I suggest using
> > centos3 and installing the app on it.
>
>
> I guess RHEL 3 is kernel 2.4.X whereas RHEL 4 is 2.6.X.
> Don't know how a binary from 2.4 will run "jus
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 8:19 AM, Raj Shekhar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> in infinite wisdom Anoop John spoke thus On 04/11/2008 10:33 AM:
> > I had a request recently from a firm in Trivandrum to try to set up
> > their software (Altair Hyperworks) on RHEL 3.
>
> Centos is the closest relative t
in infinite wisdom Anoop John spoke thus On 04/11/2008 10:33 AM:
> I had a request recently from a firm in Trivandrum to try to set up
> their software (Altair Hyperworks) on RHEL 3.
Centos is the closest relative to rhel, not fedora. I suggest using
centos3 and installing the app on it.
--
r
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 11:28 PM, Shiv wrote:
> I've found that a man's best friend in such cases is the ldd command.
Shiv - Thanks for the tip. I will find that useful the next time.
Does that mean that if all dependencies are met the application would
work fine on all distros? Will there be pr
>>From: Anoop John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>If there are dependancies will we
>be able to figure them out without having access to the source?
Hi,
I've found that a man's best friend in such cases is the ldd command.
once you have installed this software, you could run ldd against the binary. It
wo
I had a request recently from a firm in Trivandrum to try to set up
their software (Altair Hyperworks) on RHEL 3. I took fedora, assuming
that if it worked on RHEL it would on fedora too, and with some minor
tweaks in the installation script I was able to set it up on Fedora 8.
So the question is,
13 matches
Mail list logo
