> "Sandip" == Sandip Bhattacharya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Sandip> On Tue, 2005-03-22 at 13:08 +0530, gaurav wrote:
>> Hi guys, I want to know if fedora is good enough for production
>> Even though I not much problem running my fc servers all people
>> I have consulted say I
On Tue, 2005-03-22 at 14:13 +0530, Raj shekhar wrote:
> Sandip Bhattacharya wrote:
> >
> > Part of it is fact, and a part is perception.
> > For perception, take a look at
> > http://atulchitnis.net/writings/eyeballtrap.php
>
> I am not sure what part Chitnis' writing answers the question the
>
Sandip Bhattacharya wrote:
>
> Part of it is fact, and a part is perception.
> For perception, take a look at
> http://atulchitnis.net/writings/eyeballtrap.php
I am not sure what part Chitnis' writing answers the question the
original poster had asked. From what I could see there, it was a ran
On Tue, 2005-03-22 at 13:08 +0530, gaurav wrote:
> Hi guys,
> I want to know if fedora is good enough for production
> Even though I not much problem running my fc servers all people I have
> consulted say I should use debian (and no I cannot pay for RHEL).is
> it based on facts
gaurav wrote:
> Hi guys,
> I want to know if fedora is good enough for production
> Even though I not much problem running my fc servers all people I have
> consulted say I should use debian (and no I cannot pay for RHEL).is
> it based on facts like security holes, bugs and resp
Hi guys,
I want to know if fedora is good enough for production
Even though I not much problem running my fc servers all people I have
consulted say I should use debian (and no I cannot pay for RHEL).is
it based on facts like security holes, bugs and response , patches
availabi
