Re: [ilugd] MBlaster II for linux too?

2003-10-28 Thread Spoonman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Well! the author is somewhat right. Because a virus written to exploit M$ boxes will make them choke the network. Secondly, If a Linux box is running an application on the target port it will have to take the massive DOS of the exploited M$

[ilugd] MBlaster II for linux too?

2003-10-27 Thread LinuxLingam
just saw this piece of news on newsforge. i wonder how does this exploit potentially attack linux and unix users? *** Windows Vulnerability Could Lead To MSBlaster II http://www.newsforge.com/article.pl?sid=03/10/27/0353239 Exploit code that takes advantage of a recent Microsoft

Re: [ilugd] MBlaster II for linux too?

2003-10-27 Thread Raj Mathur
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 LL == linuxlingam [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: LL just saw this piece of news on newsforge. i wonder how does LL this exploit potentially attack linux and unix users? LL *** LL Windows Vulnerability Could Lead To MSBlaster II LL

Re: [ilugd] MBlaster II for linux too?

2003-10-27 Thread LinuxLingam
I'd take the assertions about a single virus running on Winduhs, Linux and Unix (what's that, anyway?) with large handfuls of salt. The author needs either substantiate his/her claim with references or, more likely, go off the crack for a while. Regards, - -- Raju - -- i wonder