hi all:
am thankful to satyaakam for drawing my attention to the ILUG-D
discussion thread on this topic.
since i am a new entrant to the list, i hope you will bear with me for
starting this as a new msg, instead of reply to the existing thread.
would like to share the following brief info about
On 08/24/2009 08:48 PM, Nalin Savara wrote:
You the one that lives in England and blindly criticizes everything in
India... right ?
I am based in the UK - but no I dont criticize everything in India.
Instead of cursing the darkness, why not light a lamp-- why dont you take
the initiative and
Hi,
Firstly, I dont think you understand Open Source as a whole, and Linux
in specific.
On 08/25/2009 11:55 AM, Nalin Savara wrote:
I had been exposed to more specific overtures of Microsoft to policy makers
etc-- and that scares me and pushes me to contribute and/or actually
encourage
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 3:49 PM, Karanbir Singhmail-li...@karan.org wrote:
Hi,
Firstly, I dont think you understand Open Source as a whole, and Linux in
specific.
On 08/25/2009 11:55 AM, Nalin Savara wrote:
I had been exposed to more specific overtures of Microsoft to policy
makers
etc--
On 08/26/2009 11:38 AM, Anupam Jain wrote:
I am not familiar with the Boss Linux team but over the past 2-3 years
I've had run-ins with other Govt. agencies building Linux
distributions (yes there are others and their functioning is obscure
by design.). But you would not see my chest swell up
On 08/26/2009 11:38 AM, Anupam Jain wrote:
I am not familiar with the Boss Linux team but over the past 2-3 years
I've had run-ins with other Govt. agencies building Linux
distributions (yes there are others and their functioning is obscure
by design.). But you would not see my chest swell
On 08/26/2009 10:58 PM, Nalin Savara wrote:
This is a proprietary compiler based on gcc-- which compiles to generate
code targetted at a MIPS microprocessor used in a consumer electronics
device.
...
Karan, if we cannot agree-- then let us agree to disagree-- as gentlemen.
I dont haveto
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 3:37 AM, Karanbir Singh mail-li...@karan.orgwrote:
On 08/26/2009 10:58 PM, Nalin Savara wrote:
This is a proprietary compiler based on gcc-- which compiles to generate
code targetted at a MIPS microprocessor used in a consumer electronics
device.
...
Karan, if we
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 1:18 AM, Nalin Savara nsn...@gmail.com wrote:
@BOSS Team, NRC FOSS people etc:
GREAT JOB GUYS!!!
KEEP IT UP. Truely, it's actions of people like yourselves that make India
truely proud and self sufficient in area of Operating Systems for the
masses.
Three Cheers
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 8:06 AM, Raj Mathur r...@linux-delhi.org wrote:
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 2:45 PM, Anurag gnu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 1:18 AM, Nalin Savara nsn...@gmail.com wrote:
@BOSS Team, NRC FOSS people etc:
GREAT JOB GUYS!!!
snip
@Raj, Anurag (Karan apart
On 08/22/2009 08:05 PM, Sanjay Arora wrote:
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 8:07 PM, Karanbir Singhmail-li...@karan.org wrote:
correct me if i am wrong, but that work might not even be GPL licensed
That's my question Karan.if they use GPL software to build a
redistributable linux, don't they
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 7:39 PM, Karanbir Singh mail-li...@karan.orgwrote:
On 08/22/2009 08:05 PM, Sanjay Arora wrote:
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 8:07 PM, Karanbir Singhmail-li...@karan.org
wrote:
correct me if i am wrong, but that work might not even be GPL licensed
That's my question
On Tuesday 25 Aug 2009, Nalin Savara wrote:
[snip]
@ Bro Karan:
You the one that lives in England and blindly criticizes everything
in India... right ?
Instead of cursing the darkness, why not light a lamp-- why dont you
take the initiative and help the guys at BOSS who may not be as
On 08/22/2009 05:57 AM, Vikram Vincent wrote:
'where ever possible' means that if upstream feels that the translations
are useful enough to integrate they will else they will not.
I dont see how this would impact the licensing of the matter covered ?
There was a discussion of this on the
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 8:07 PM, Karanbir Singhmail-li...@karan.org wrote:
correct me if i am wrong, but that work might not even be GPL licensed
That's my question Karan.if they use GPL software to build a
redistributable linux, don't they have to share its code...simply
because they made
On 08/21/2009 04:44 AM, Vikram Vincent wrote:
I've not looked in a few months, but the last time I did - it was
incomplete.
Where ever possible efforts are on to integrate with upstream.
I dont understand what this means. 'where ever possible'.
Can you share some info on when / where its
Where ever possible efforts are on to integrate with upstream.
I dont understand what this means. 'where ever possible'.
'where ever possible' means that if upstream feels that the translations
are useful enough to integrate they will else they will not.
There was a discussion of this on the
Hi,
Today's Dainik Jagran Delhi edition carried a half page advertisement about
workshop for government officials on BOSS GNU/Linux. URL for details mentioned
was http://bosslinux.in/workshop
It also had invitation from hardware vendors for getting their hardware
certified for BOSS GNU/Linux.
On 08/20/2009 07:41 AM, Nishant Sharma wrote:
I appreciate the move by CDAC and NRCFOSS to make government officials aware of
FOSS and BOSS.
Would be even nicer if it really was open source :)
--
Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : 2522...@icq
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 3:14 PM, Karanbir Singhmail-li...@karan.org wrote:
On 08/20/2009 07:41 AM, Nishant Sharma wrote:
I appreciate the move by CDAC and NRCFOSS to make government officials
aware of FOSS and BOSS.
Would be even nicer if it really was open source :)
Doesn't it have to be
On 08/20/2009 12:57 PM, Sanjay Arora wrote:
Doesn't it have to be open source ? Isn't that the nature of the
beast? GPL license in this case?
Could you please point out where they post the source tree's and the
build scripts ?
--
Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : 2522...@icq
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 5:39 PM, Karanbir Singh mail-li...@karan.orgwrote:
On 08/20/2009 12:57 PM, Sanjay Arora wrote:
Doesn't it have to be open source ? Isn't that the nature of the
beast? GPL license in this case?
Could you please point out where they post the source tree's and the
Doesn't it have to be open source ? Isn't that the
nature of the
beast? GPL license in this case?
Could you please point out where they post the source
tree's and the build
scripts ?
Just browsed through their website.
From the URL
On 08/20/2009 02:18 PM, Nishant Sharma wrote:
URL http://bosslinux.in/downloads contains links for source of all the
releases.
I've not looked in a few months, but the last time I did - it was
incomplete. only the debian / upstream sources from other repo's was
added in. Special interest
2009/8/20 Karanbir Singh mail-li...@karan.org:
I've not looked in a few months, but the last time I did - it was
incomplete. only the debian / upstream sources from other repo's was added
in. Special interest was in the indic language specific work they are doing
and there were no sources
25 matches
Mail list logo
