--- Raj Mathur [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If Tarun, Vivek and Sudev don't have an issue, we
When did Vivek make it an issue. I was doing exactly
what i was asked to do and i think this was the
mistake i made. I should been creative too and looked
out for some nice guys to sponsor the time and
Raj Mathur wrote:
Exactly what issues are there with branding? As far as I remember
when Tarun Dua had volunteered to host creative.linux-delhi.org
As it stands I promised to get the required space available. So I got it
sponsored from some nice guys who want a small diminuitive link at the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tarun == Tarun Dua [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Tarun Raj Mathur wrote:
Exactly what issues are there with branding? As far as I
remember when Tarun Dua had volunteered to host
creative.linux-delhi.org
Tarun As it stands I
On Tue, 2005-02-08 at 13:39 +0530, Tarun Dua wrote:
Raj Mathur wrote:
Exactly what issues are there with branding? As far as I remember
when Tarun Dua had volunteered to host creative.linux-delhi.org
As it stands I promised to get the required space available. So I got it
sponsored from
--- Tarun Dua [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As it stands I promised to get the required space
available. So I got it
sponsored from some nice guys who want a small
diminuitive link at the
footer. There was an apparent rough consensus with
Niyam that he won't
bother about a smallish link at
--- Sandip Bhattacharya [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IMO, having a sponsor link or even a small logo
should not be a problem
to most people. Gazillions of FOSS web sites the
world over have such a
setup(e.g. see kernel.org footer). I have no clue
why someone should
have a issue with this,
Trimmed for readability:
Sandip Bhattacharya wrote:
IMO, having a sponsor link or even a small logo should not be a problem
to most people. Gazillions of FOSS web sites the world over have such a
setup(e.g. see kernel.org footer). I have no clue why someone should
I don't think anyone has a
On Tue, 2005-02-08 at 15:22, vivek khurana wrote:
--- Tarun Dua [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As it stands I promised to get the required space
available. So I got it
sponsored from some nice guys who want a small
diminuitive link at the
footer. There was an apparent rough consensus with
--- Sudev Barar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
^
If it turns out this is exactly the situation then??
Do you not have
confidence in your LUG members not to commit breach
of ethics? How do I
know what content you have created? Has it been put
On Wed, 2005-02-09 at 07:13, vivek khurana wrote:
If it turns out this is exactly the situation then??
Do you not have
confidence in your LUG members not to commit breach
of ethics? How do I
know what content you have created? Has it been put
online somewhere so
that all LUG members
The tone of this discussion is becoming painful now. I have absolutely
no idea of the chronology of events. So bear me out.
Lets get one thing clear:
Say, before the project was started, out of enthusiasm nobody bothered
to ask the sponsors if there is anything that they wanted in return
(most
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sandip == Sandip Bhattacharya [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Sandip The tone of this discussion is becoming painful now. I
Sandip have absolutely no idea of the chronology of events. So
Sandip bear me out.
Agreed to the first, and maybe
On Wed, 2005-02-09 at 10:10 +0530, Raj Mathur wrote:
As you know, we are in the middle of Linux
Asia 2005 and this is probably not a good time to get into involved
discussions on what branding should be present, how large, placement,
position, colour, font, etc.
IMO, think this branding term
13 matches
Mail list logo
