Sharninder Singh wrote:
Or alternatively the concerned person could have just been patient for
somebody else to mail to the list. This list is not such low activity
that a person cannot be patient to receive a mail from it.
But enough said on this. I think he gets the idea and next time he
will
On Sun, 14 Mar 2004 16:16:35 +0530
Abhijit Menon-Sen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 2004-03-14 16:12:20 +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Did we pass?
No, you were supposed to ignore the message.
yes, You were supposed to give it a pass. Sorry, for hogging your bandwidth people, I
was just
Sharninder Singh wrote:
yes, You were supposed to give it a pass. Sorry, for hogging your bandwidth people,
I was just testing if the filters I have set in my mail client (sylpheed) are working fine.
I'm using sylpheed for the first time today.
You could have just sent a mail to yourself with
On Mon, 2004-03-15 at 13:59, Spoonman wrote:
Sharninder Singh wrote:
yes, You were supposed to give it a pass. Sorry, for hogging your bandwidth
people,
I was just testing if the filters I have set in my mail client (sylpheed) are
working fine.
I'm using sylpheed for the first time
Or alternatively the concerned person could have just been patient for
somebody else to mail to the list. This list is not such low activity
that a person cannot be patient to receive a mail from it.
But enough said on this. I think he gets the idea and next time he
will not do it.
