Re: Leopard on a 2x450 PowerMac

2010-11-30 Thread misterbleepy
Here's the procedure: http://lowendmac.com/osx/leopard/openfirmware.html Another way I have used is to put the low spec machine in target disk mode, then attaching it to a Mac that is in spec, and installing it using that Mac, but putting the install on the external disk (i.e. the disk of the

Re: Leopard on a 2x450 PowerMac

2010-11-30 Thread Tina K.
On 2010/11/30 04:34, misterbleepy so eloquently wrote: Another way I have used is to put the low spec machine in target disk mode, then attaching it to a Mac that is in spec, and installing it using that Mac, but putting the install on the external disk (i.e. the disk of the Mac in target disk

Re: Leopard on a 2x450 PowerMac

2010-11-30 Thread misterbleepy
I have done it this way from an Intel Macbook to a G4 iMac (using an intermediary disk) - it worked fine, and they are completely different architectures. It suggests an OSX install installs all the OS code for all supported hardware, but other than my experience with the above, I have no actual

Re: Leopard on a 2x450 PowerMac

2010-11-30 Thread Steven
On Nov 30, 2010, at 8:15 AM, misterbleepy wrote: It suggests an OSX install installs all the OS code for all supported hardware, but other than my experience with the above, I have no actual proof that is the case. That sounds right. If you'll remember, when Snow Leopard came out one of the

Re: Leopard on a 2x450 PowerMac

2010-11-30 Thread Tina K.
On 2010/11/30 11:38, Steven so eloquently wrote: That sounds right. If you'll remember, when Snow Leopard came out one of the biggest improvements was gigabytes of hard drive space freed up, since there was no more doubled PowerPC code. I think it is reasonable to assume that a retail disk