Any thing showing up in the logs?
There was one report of a problem with the latest patch by MS affecting
Declude on a high volume system. Only one report. I do not know what the
resolution was. But if you removed Declude, that is not the same issue.
John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA
Engineer/Consultant
Imail v 8.02
Windows 2003 Server
New Installation
Declude 1.75??
I am seeing a problem where the Queue Manager will send all the mail out
of the queue when the service starts, then nothing else will be sent
until the service is restarted.
This is a clean installation on a new machine. I started w
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
> Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 3:01 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Which are okay for Trusted Blacklists
>
>
>
> >Which lists are okay for trusted blacklists (
> That box is checked.
> Outlook restarted.
> Same result with Outlook Express.
You're not passing AUTH commands to the server, according to the logs.
I'd run NetMon on the workstation and verify the transaction. Also
make sure that you're logging in using the full [EMAIL PROTECTED] (though
Hi,
When creating a white list where do they sit? If someone is on the white
list do all other spam features get bypassed or do they still go through
the checks?
Next question if the case is that they aren't check for spam then do white
list get check everytime? Or do I need to restart the queu
Another option is to use the latest version or Peer Sync, which can do byte level
replication. Very low overhead, efficient. Essentially would replace the Robo Copy.
You could then always have a current mirror on the target. Before this version, Peer
Sync used file level replication, which i
I wonder if they will be making this availible for the killer web
templates? I wonder if can we merge the changes? I don't use the
classic templates.
ttyl,
Allen Armstrong
On Fri, 19 Sep 2003, Kevin Bilbee wrote:
> Download the templates they are not installed or downloaded wiht the patch.
>
5 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Re[2]: [IMail Forum] SMTP Auth and Relay for Addresses
>
>
> Oh yes. Thank you. I'm sure there is a setting somewhere I am
missing
>
> With "Relay for Addresses" where 167.248.130.202 is not in the list but
]: [IMail Forum] SMTP Auth and Relay for Addresses
Oh yes. Thank you. I'm sure there is a setting somewhere I am missing
With "Relay for Addresses" where 167.248.130.202 is not in the list but the
client is set to Authenticate:
20030919 174652 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (0075057E) [167.24
Oh yes. Thank you. I'm sure there is a setting somewhere I am missing
With "Relay for Addresses" where 167.248.130.202 is not in the list but the
client is set to Authenticate:
20030919 174652 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (0075057E) [167.248.130.202] EHLO milton
20030919 174652
None by themselves.
This email details the best combination for immediate deletion from what I
have seen posted, though it must hit 3 blacklists to trigger:
- Original Message -
From: "William Van Hefner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 11:4
> With Outlook200x and Outlook Express as remote clients, with 'my
> SMTP server requires authentication' checked, they are still unable
> to send.
Logs?
-Sandy
Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist
Broadleaf Systems, a division of
Cypress Integrated Sys
Are these roaming users using another network besides yours. Could their ISP
be blocking port 25?
Have them try to telnet to the box to see if they can connect.
telnet ipaddr|hostname 25
Kevin Bilbee
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf
For some reason the site can not be found...
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of IT
> Department
> Sent: Saturday, September 13, 2003 2:48 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Log Examiner
>
>
> You can download a b
Cheap but powerful http://www.softheap.com/bomber.html
To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
I have a large mailinglist of about 2 million users from a sports site I am
contracting for.
I tried to send a mailing to the list, but it grew to 289m in the que and never sent.
Any ideas?
This is a legitimate group not a purchased list and if i buy a 3rd party app, I might
be subject to spam
Thanks to help from Sandy and Scott, I have created a batch file to extract
daily a PST archive file from mail boxes on exchange using exmerge. I needed
this for a client and found no other way, so I created a way.
If any one is interested, please let me know off list. (I am sure there is
an easie
I do not want to prevent them. They are not able to.
Their IP addresses are not blocked anywhere explicitly.
With Outlook200x and Outlook Express as remote clients, with 'my SMTP server
requires authentication' checked, they are still unable to send.
William
- Original Message -
From:
> When setting SMTP to "Relay For Addresses", I understand that users that are
> set to authenticate should still be able to send even if their IP is not in
> the address list.
> Is there another mechanism that might prevent this?
You want to prevent people from being able to send, even if
When setting SMTP to "Relay For Addresses", I understand that users that are
set to authenticate should still be able to send even if their IP is not in
the address list.
Is there another mechanism that might prevent this?
IMail 8.02 on Windows 2000 sp4.
To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com
Hey Guys,
I think I found a little bug in your SDK, I would like to know if this
is my problem or a problem with the SDK so I can quit pulling my hair
out J . Basically, when I get a domain's information like
users/alias/etc. I connect the server with their username/password like
pServer->Conne
Which lists are okay for trusted blacklists (immediate deletion)
It depends on who you ask. If you ask me, none are (as I haven't seen any
DNS-based blacklists with 0 false positives yet). However, some people
would argue that the benefits of blacklisting based on a single test (only
using th
Which lists are okay for trusted blacklists (immediate deletion)
To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
If it is only for a web server, the OEM web server version is the cheapest
if you are building your own server.
CDW usually has good prices.
John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA
Engineer/Consultant
eServices For You
www.eservicesforyou.com
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:IMa
Has anyone here upgraded from Windows 2000 server to Windows 2003 Standard?
We have started getting daily ASP lockups from the DLLHOST.exe and thought
this may be an easy out.
Also, where is the best place to buy it at a discount?
Mike
To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-li
Hello Len,
Friday, September 19, 2003, 2:43:28 PM, you wrote:
LC> sure, esp when on an IMGate relay, the msgs typically spend less the 10
LC> seconds in the system.
Without RAM drive my IMGate messages usually see a delay of about 3
secs.
LC> the big problem is the size of the ram disk. What h
Hi-
Getting ready to finally upgrade from version 5 to Version 8. At the same
time, I also plan to upgrade to a new physical server.
Can anyone tell me if its recommended that I upgrade on the old server
server, then move everything to the new server. Or, should I just backup the
registry and
Has anyone considered putting the spool partition on a RAM drive?
sure, esp when on an IMGate relay, the msgs typically spend less the 10
seconds in the system.
I
haven't thought about RAM drives since DOS but for a Store and Forward
server it would mean the messages would never have to touch th
Flash Ram can be mounted as an IDE device. It is faster than a drive,
but slower than DRAM. Cost is minimal... .but my concern is 'how many
times can it be written to and erased?'... Is it infinite or is there a
limit? It works great for the journal drive in journaling file systems
and I have cons
Ram drive for the Spool is the fastest way to go.
However, I would make sure it had the capability to save to disk during
shutdown.
John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA
Engineer/Consultant
eServices For You
www.eservicesforyou.com
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:IMail_Forum-
> Any thoughts or caveats?
The ramdrive.sys from the DDK tops out at 32 MB, I believe, so don't
use that one! We've used the third-party RAM drive software from
SuperSpeed, which works amazingly well as an accelerator. The caveat
is clear: BSOD, power outage, etc. = an unknowable am
Here's the command line for the SA training with IMail mailboxes, works
fine here:
c:\etc\mail\sa-learn -p c:/etc/mail/SpamAssassin/user_prefs --spam
--mbox d:\imail\users\spam\main.mbx
Attila
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gah! doing more research it turns out that SA-Learn has a --mbox feature
w
My bad. I misread the release notes. Sorry
-Original Message-
From: Lee Drake [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: September 19, 2003 12:56 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] 8.03 Patch
Did you install the updates to the web template as well?
Lee Drake
Aztek Computer Solut
Andrew's server is reporting as version 8.02, so it doesn't look as though
it was fixed. Unless it is broken again.
Jason
- Original Message -
From: "R. Scott Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 11:43 AM
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Simple D
Hello,
Has anyone considered putting the spool partition on a RAM drive? I
haven't thought about RAM drives since DOS but for a Store and Forward
server it would mean the messages would never have to touch the hard
drive's I/O system. Right?
Any thoughts or caveats?
--
Best regards,
David
Did you install the updates to the web template as well?
Lee Drake
Aztek Computer Solutions, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ron Hiller
Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 1:23 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] 8.03 Pat
-
FamHostTo: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'Subject:
[IMail Forum] VeriSign Sued Over Controversial Web
Service
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/nm/20030919/wr_nm/tech_verisign_lawsuit_dc_1
Get em!
Download the templates they are not installed or downloaded wiht the patch.
Kevin Bilbee
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ron Hiller
> Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 10:23 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] 8.03 P
> IMail v8's anti-spam is split into two parts -- one runs before
> smtp32.exe (at Step 3), the other runs afterwards (somewhere after
> Step 6, during smtp32.exe).
Technically speaking, SMTP32.EXE is only used to "tell" QM that a new
message is ready. Most content scanning must be done af
I installed it and I am looking for the address book templates that this patch was
supposed to install. I can't seem to find them. Where the heck are they? Can anyone
tell me?
Ron
-Original Message-
From: Kami Razvan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: September 19, 2003 9:55 AM
To: [EMA
ah yes the quick fix to a scanner until a new definition can be created.
Greg
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Sanford
Whiteman
Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 1:00 PM
To: Greg Foulks
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] FW: Reject: (33B) Message rejec
Title: VeriSign Sued Over Controversial Web Service
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/nm/20030919/wr_nm/tech_verisign_lawsuit_dc_1
Get em!
Tis not always work.
The Q is the actual envelope as received. The D may or may not contain the
actual sender and/or recipient.
John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA
Engineer/Consultant
eServices For You
www.eservicesforyou.com
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [m
> I am getting the following log entries when the Imail server is
> trying to send to a local user:
> 20030919 154948 127.0.0.1 SMTP (456) ERR mail.galileo360mail.com
> read open fail (D:\IMail\Users\test\main.mbx)
> 20030919 154948 127.0.0.1 SMTP (456) ER
> I can assure you I do not nor am I sending any viruses. Why are you bouncing
> my messages?
This was likely bounced because the engine's name for a virus was
found in the subject line (not actually a "signature," of course, but
it can happen.
-Sandy
Q files are gone. So looks like I am out of luck eh??
Just remember this for next time:
Never, ever, ever remove D*.SMD files from the \IMail\spool directory
without removing the associated Q*.SMD files (from either the \IMail\spool
or \IMail\spool\overflow directory). Never, ever leave a Q*.S
I'm not sure how easy it would be to recreate the
Q*.smd files, but if you check to see what the format is, you may be about to
write a script to recreate them from the D*.smd files.
Good luck!
Bill
- Original Message -
From:
Chris
Andrews
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You
could build a Q file for each of the spool files
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Chris
AndrewsSent: Friday, September 19, 2003 12:44 PMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Slammed by
SWEN what to do with s
Q files are gone. So looks like I am out of luck eh??
At least I'm not going crazy and missing something. If this is a bug, was
there ever a patch for it? I don't want to spend the money to go to 8.x and
I don't have a service contact so I can't upgrade it.
Despite being such a serious problem, I never saw any release notes that
show that it was e
Did you also move the corresponding Q*.smd files
into the queue, as well? If not, you will need to do that before the
messages will get delivered. Otherwise, they will be viewed as orphaned
files.
Bill
- Original Message -
From:
Chris
Andrews
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gah! doing more research it turns out that SA-Learn has a --mbox feature
which I'm guessing will work right out of the box with IMail's .mbx files.
I'll do some experimenting tonight when i get home.
> Does anyone have any suggestions on translating the mail .mbx files into
> something that can
Title: Message
Thanks
for the info!
-Original Message-From: Mark Gordon
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 19,
2003 10:23 AMTo: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'Subject:
[IMail Forum] New virus going around - W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED] - list of
subjects
This
is a lis
Scott,
At least I'm not going crazy and missing something. If this is a bug, was
there ever a patch for it? I don't want to spend the money to go to 8.x and
I don't have a service contact so I can't upgrade it.
--Jason W. All
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PR
>> My question is, if this server knows the MX records of hotmail, why is
Imail
>> trying to send the message to 64.4.33.7??At 11:48 AM 9/19/2003, Jason
W. Allen wrote:
I'm having the same problem. Only it's not only with Hotmail.
Here's the deal.
A mailserver *should* use the A record for a d
Does anyone have any suggestions on translating the mail .mbx files into
something that can be passed into SpamAssasin for heuristics training? As
I understand it, SA wants individual RFC822 files. To me that sounds like
I need some [windows based] utility that can convert .mbx to individual
RFC
IMail Forum:
Ipswitch is pleased to announce the release of IMail Server 8.03. You must
be running version 8.0x to apply this patch. The free patch can be
downloaded via FTP at:
IMail Small Business or Professional users:
FTP://ftp.ipswitch.com/Ipswitch/Product_Support/IMail/imail803.exe
IMail
I can assure you I do not nor am I sending any viruses. Why are you bouncing
my messages?
Greg
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 11:47 AM
To: Greg Foulks
Subject: Reject: (33B) Message reject b
Title: RE: [IMail Forum] New virus going around - W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bummer
man! Good luck
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Mark
GordonSent: Friday, September 19, 2003 11:39 AMTo:
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'Subject: RE: [IMail For
file,
because I don't think this is a proper fix.
Here's Some of the log
20030919 44 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (0038001C) [192.168.2.117] HELO
AspEmail
20030919 44 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (0038001C) [192.168.2.117] MAIL FROM:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
20030919 44 127.0.0.1 SMTPD
Title: RE: [IMail Forum] New virus going around - W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Greg,
I have talked to Scott about it, I think its a hardware issue as our cpu's are a
couple years old. I have to do it the hard way with rules.
-Original Message-From: Greg Foulks
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]S
Title: RE: [IMail Forum] New virus going around - W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mark,
Strange I've never heard of anybody having a CPU utilization problem when
using Declude. Have you worked with Scott Perry at Declude to try to work
through the issues your having? I've found them to be very helpful a
Thanks Rick... You don't know if it was fixed for SMTP in version 8.03?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Rick Leske
Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 11:28 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Buffer Problem in the mail from
Yes
Title: RE: [IMail Forum] New virus going around - W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
This
is a list of subject I got in my virus box for this new annoyance
FYI:
Subjects
BLANK
Abort Annoucement
Abort Message
Bug Advise
Current Network Patch
Current Security Patch
Error Advise
Internet Security Upgrade
L
Hi,
If anyone can help me with I will be forever grateful cause I am
stumped.
I am getting the following log entries when the Imail server is trying
to send to a local user:
127.0.0.1 SMTPD (0013013A) [192.168.1.33] connect 195.200.24.240
port 4473
20030919 154936 127.0.0.1 SMTPD
Title: RE: [IMail Forum] New virus going around - W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Greg
we have tried Declude. The amount of traffic on our server and the number of
hosts prevents us from doing so. It kills the box CPU wise.
-Original Message-From: Greg Foulks
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent:
Hi all,
I have a problem which I have identified as being caused by simple DNS
errors. Maybe you can help get me straightened out:
My IMail Log:
SMTP (05300020) Trying hotmail.com (0)
SMTP (05300020) Stack connect fail "64.4.52.7"
SMTP (05300020) Stack connect fail "64.4.32.7"
SMTP (05300020) Sta
Hi,
If anyone can help me with I will be forever grateful cause I am
stumped.
I am getting the following log entries when the Imail server is trying
to send to a local user:
127.0.0.1 SMTPD (0013013A) [192.168.1.33] connect 195.200.24.240
port 4473
20030919 154936 127.0.0.1 SMTPD
Yes.. version 8.03 fixes it for pop3 anyway
~Rick
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Greg Foulks
> Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 10:13 AM - FamHost
> To: IMail_Forum (E-mail)
> Subject: [IMail Forum] Buffer Problem in the mail from
>
>
Title: RE: [IMail Forum] New virus going around - W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mark,
Why
aren't using some kind of scanner in front of your Imail server? then you won't
have to worry about using a rule to stop these emails... They'll be stopped
because of the extensions that are attached more import
Is anyone aware of a problem with Imail version 6.x that would allow for a
buffer over run in the mail from?
I ran a security scan on my mailservers IP address and found this error...
Description
smtp (25/tcp)
There seem to be a buffer overflow in the remote SMTP server
when the server is issued
Title: RE: [IMail Forum] New virus going around - W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Group can someone come up with a rule to block this virus on the imail end so far here are my senders and the subject. The attachement name changes also but it is still an '.exe'
From:
Customer Support
We are running on it now...
Stopped all services..
Ran the update
Real Smooth..
Regards,
Kami
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy Ognenoff
Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 10:38 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [IMail Forum] 8.03 Patch
One of my wonderful clients installed the exe patch containing the SWEN
virus. My SMTP service was brought to a stand still with over 19,000
emails sitting in the queue. I moved all the SMD files into a new
directory and searched for the offending IP address. After I got them
blocked I moved t
Anyone tested the 8.03 patch yet?
Andy Ognenoff
Online Systems Administrator
Cousins Submarines, Inc.
To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/
Good point, Kris. It's simple for me because I only have one IP per server.
Tom
- Original Message -
From: Kris McElroy
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 10:03 AM
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] How to restore a Imail server in 15 minutes
9. Put MAXMAIL003's IP on the s
Hey all,
One of my wonderful clients installed the
exe patch containing the SWEN virus. My SMTP service was brought to a stand
still with over 19,000 emails sitting in the queue. I moved all the SMD files
into a new directory and searched for the offending IP address. After I got
them b
9. Put
MAXMAIL003's IP on the server and rename
##
Interface configuration# netsh -c interface dump
>c:\primaryMailIP.txt# netsh -f
c:\primaryMailIP.txt##
I would also add a scheduled task
to export the Network card settings (IP, DNS,
Title: Message
Hi
Tom,
I'm
not concerned by your wonderfull explanation yet ... but I keep this in the best
tips about Imail in case of.
thanks
a lot for sharing this!
Best
regards,
Mike.
-Message d'origine-De :
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la
Larry:
Could I get a copy of your prog?
Thanks in advance!
Jeff Metcalfe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(727) 786-7955
Hi Gang,
I thought I would share with you a way that you can
recover your mail server in 15 minutes. I administer several Imail
servers, each with about 2000 domains. Average traffic is about 40,000
in/out emails per day/ per mail server. I run declude AV and Junkmail on
all. When a se
Could anyone share some insight on the format of mailboxes and single mails?
.mbx files are in standard Unix format, where a new E-mail is designated by
the presence of "From <" at the beginning of a line (if an E-mail happens
to have a line beginning with "From <", a ">" will be added in front
I got the following error.
-From: Mail Delivery System
-To:
-Subject: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender
-
-Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2003 10:35:40 +0200
-
-A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
-recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es
Eric Carr wrote:
Could anyone share some insight on the format of mailboxes and single mails?
If i want to parse them myself, how do I know where the headers end and the
body begins?
iMail mail files are created in 'mbox' format. I think the relevant RFC
is 822. But here's some 'short notes
Is there a way, in either v 7.x or 8.x, to strip attachments from messages
that are forwarded by IMail?
Unfortunately, I don't believe there is any way to do that (without writing
a custom program, which would require MIME processing).
-Scott
--
Could anyone share some insight on the format of mailboxes and single mails?
If i want to parse them myself, how do I know where the headers end and the
body begins?
A single mail in its simplest format:
Received: from [whatever was HELO'ed] [1.2.3.4] by mail.foo.com
(SMTPD32-8.02) id A18F3800
Hi
I got the following error.
-From: Mail Delivery System
-To:
-Subject: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender
-
-Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2003 10:35:40 +0200
-
-A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
-recipients. This is a permanent error. The following addres
87 matches
Mail list logo
