list help solve problems
more times than I can count.
All the best to you guys in the new year!
Cheers,
Gary Brumm
ComsecNet
Dedicated Data Services
Stockton, CA
Phone:(209) 609-9495
Fax:(209) 938-0481
This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
which it is addressed
Hi Travis,
As long as you install MS Office as the administrator initially it
only takes a few seconds to set up the new users individual profile
on first use.
As SJ correctly points out OpenOffice is not a good solution in a
business situation where you are exchanging documents with the outsi
www.croftssoftware.com has a free password decoder for Imail but if
you have a lot of users
you will probably want something that generates a report.
At 12:03 PM 8/18/2006, you wrote:
I am in the process
of moving from Imail to a Linux box...how do you transfer all the
usernames and passwords
Confusion?? .seems pretty clear what is going on.he called
and explained the situation, you told him he was screwed,
and now you are trying to do some public damage control...too little too
late as usual...unbelievable..
At 01:30 PM 12/5/2005, you wrote:
hi
steve,
sorry about the
We have used the Declude SPAM and Virus products with Imail for many
years and are very happy with it.
Their support has been excellent as well (especially when Scott was still
around). It is well worth the money.
Gary
At 06:10 PM 7/12/2005, you wrote:
Were
looking into 'out sourcing' the SP
We use WorkGroupShare (www.workgroupshare.com) and are happy with it. It's
the same software that is bundled with
IMail Colaboration Suite but you aren't forced to pay Ipswitch for all the
extra bundled stuff you don't need (or want). It starts at
around $150 for 5 users so it is really cost ef
At 05:21 AM 4/23/2005, you wrote:
We are researching ideas for future version of IMail and would like some
feedback on web servers.
1) Do you currently Run IIS or Apache? If so, which one?
IIS
2) If IMail required a web server, which would you prefer: a proprietary
web server shipped with IMai
You might try WorkGroupShare at workgroupshare .com . It is the
same software they bundle in ICS but you aren't "forced" to pay
foe a 250 user license + a lot of other crap you don't need. It
starts at $150 for 5 users and is really easy to set up. There is a
30 day demo download.
At 11:40 AM
There are two *easy* solutions to his problem:
1. Use SBC's (free) SMTP servers
2. If you contact SBC and request that they remove the block...they will!
(as long as you don't become a problem by abusing port25).
The author obviously did absolutely no research before writing this.
At 11:02 AM
The only problem I see with this is that if a user gets 100 SPAMs a day he
will receive 100 SPAM notifications a day and that would be just as annoying.
Gary
At 08:12 AM 3/25/2005, you wrote:
We currently have Declude running with I-mail 8.15. For the most part, we
are pretty happy with it. Howev
At 07:35 AM 3/25/2005, you wrote:
> You can not change the way others choose to run their business, but you
> may have to adapt the way you look at things to allow your customers to
> be happy with your service.
I think this is a statement that this whole argument surrounds.
Professionally and mora
At 03:13 PM 3/24/2005, you wrote:
>If you use the DSL providers SMTP service (free with any decent DSL
>connection) for outgoing mail
>isn't the problem solved? When SBC started blocking port 25 we just
>switched our Exchange customers
>outgoing mail to use smtp.sbcglobal.net (or whatever)...probl
Scott, I think you may have misunderstood my position on the issue. "I"
don't want to block anyone based only on the fact
that their RDNS doesn't look quite right to me. We use (your) weighted
tests and are very happy with the results. We might
however want a customer to use their ISP's SMTP s
If you use the DSL providers SMTP service (free with any decent DSL
connection) for outgoing mail
isn't the problem solved? When SBC started blocking port 25 we just
switched our Exchange customers
outgoing mail to use smtp.sbcglobal.net (or whatever)...problem solved and
no RDNS issues. Colla
Can't your clients who insist on hosting their own email server on a DSL or
cable line just use the ISP's
SMTP server (which should have a proper RDNS record) and get on with their
lives? They can still
retrieve their email from their Exchange (or whatever) serverwhy do the
NEED to send thr
Thanks for the explanation Scott. I will explain the test to the
recipients IT guy. They are using a Symantec anti spam solution on their
IMail server and from what I have heard it's a pretty flawed system so I
guess they will have to white list our customer if they want to receive
email from
At 06:52 PM 3/17/2005, you wrote:
> At 06:04 PM 3/17/2005, you wrote:
> > > I have a customer who swears we have our reverse DNS set up
> > > wrong.at dnsstuff.com we pass every test...except the
> > > DNS timing test. If you put our customers domain (aclc.org)
> > > into the box
> > > and sel
At 06:04 PM 3/17/2005, you wrote:
> I have a customer who swears we have our reverse DNS set up
> wrong.at
> dnsstuff.com we pass every test...except the
> DNS timing test. If you put our customers domain (aclc.org)
> into the box
> and select PTR it says our DNS server reports
> no PTR record
I have a customer who swears we have our reverse DNS set up wrong.at
dnsstuff.com we pass every test...except the
DNS timing test. If you put our customers domain (aclc.org) into the box
and select PTR it says our DNS server reports
no PTR records (even though it is authoritive for our subne
Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:IMail_Forum-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gary Brumm
> Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2005 7:35 AM
> To: IMail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
> Subject: [IMail Forum] Reverse dns issue
>
> I have a colocation customer who is reportin
server. Once the server is connected to aol's mail server,
aol's mail server responds back that there is no reverse dns. Please let
me know what pbi says. I have clients breathing down my neck about not
being able to send email to aol.
Paul
-Original Message-----
From: Gary Brumm [mai
Macus, I have been using an app called Port Explorer. You might want to
check it out:
http://www.diamondcs.com.au/portexplorer/
Gary
At 06:14 AM 3/2/2005, you wrote:
> Get TCPView from sysinternals.com
Hmm, some years ago I've had to leave my office, sit in my car and drive to
the datacenter in
I believe you need to open the ports above 1025 to initiate the outgoing
connections.
I am sure someone will correct me if I am wrong :-).
Gary
At 06:49 PM 2/24/2005, you wrote:
I have been working
on configuring TCP/IP Filtering on my server.
Server is Windows 2000
IMail 8
Can receive, bu
Eudora does redirects as well.
At 08:19 AM 2/18/2005, you wrote:
On Friday, February 18, 2005 at 4:12:27 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
confabulated:
> Okay I misunderstood...You could use the IMail client on the server to do
> this. The only other mail client I know of that can do this is The Bat! (
Did you shut down the IMail syslog service (port conflict)?
At 02:24 PM 2/16/2005, you wrote:
I am having trouble setting up Kiwi Log Server on the mail server.
I have installed it and set SMTP to log to Log Server, but Kiwi isn't
hearing a thing.
It is defaulted to listen to TCP 1468, I can not fi
-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gary Brumm
> Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2005 8:05 PM
> To: IMail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
> Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Forwarding Won't Go Away
>
>
> Thanks John,
>
> I checked the users directory a
Hi Bruce,
We use Compaq servers in our NOC hooked up w/redundant supplies as you
mentioned.
I don't ever remember having a PS failure in one of these servers but if
one does no big deal
We use IBM servers in the office environments and Gateway desktops. We
have reps for both
companies and g
TECTED] [mailto:IMail_Forum-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gary Brumm
> Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2005 5:24 PM
> To: IMail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
> Subject: [IMail Forum] Forwarding Won't Go Away
>
> I have a customer that set up temporary forwarding on an account via the
> web interfa
I have a customer that set up temporary forwarding on an account via the
web interface. Now he wants it stopped and
can't shut off the forward. I went into the IMail Admin interface and
verifies the forwarding address was blank. I changed
and re-saved the account. I deleted and recreated the
o jury in the world who has ever received spam would convict me!
William Van Hefner
Network Administrator
Vantek Communications, Inc.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gary Brumm
> Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2005 12:37 PM
> To:
or
Vantek Communications, Inc.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gary Brumm
> Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2005 10:31 AM
> To: IMail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
> Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Filanet InterJak 200
>
>
>
At 10:02 AM 1/27/2005, you wrote:
Len,
Was wondering if you had taken a look at something called SpamCannibal at
http://www.spamcannibal.org . It is something akin to the Anvil feature you
describe, but with a twist. The stated aim of the daemon on its website is,
"SpamCannibal's TCP/IP tarpit stop
At 02:46 AM 1/27/2005, you wrote:
So I'm guessing that if a static IP is being assigned, it would still
be ok for SMTP services
running on the DSL.
Yes, if you have a static IP port 25 is not blocked. You can fill out
their online abuse reporting form and "opt out"
of the port 25 block and t
The problem with these programs (I tried Port Tunnel) is that all off the
messages that come through the alternate port
appear to originate from the IMail machine's IP and this makes you an open
relay. This happens even if the machine's
IPs are not in the "allow these IPs list". Authenticated S
y
> At 05:47 PM 1/23/2005, you wrote:
>>You might try working something out with your bandwidth provider so that
>>you could NAT your network. Mine does work on NAT, but I'm not a Cisco
>>expert so I don't know if there is another way to do this.
>>
>>Mat
y working something out with your bandwidth provider so that
you could NAT your network. Mine does work on NAT, but I'm not a Cisco
expert so I don't know if there is another way to do this.
Matt
Gary Brumm wrote:
Hi Matt,
Thanks for the reply. I have a main Cisco router where ports
port
exploit, so a router has many advantages besides this one thing.
Matt
Gary Brumm wrote:
SBC just blocked port 25 for their dynamically assigned DSL users. I can
have those users switch to SBC's SMTP servers but I have
been meaning to open up port 587 for my users that travel. I was
wo
SBC just blocked port 25 for their dynamically assigned DSL users. I can
have those users switch to SBC's SMTP servers but I have
been meaning to open up port 587 for my users that travel. I was wondering
what software solutions you guys have been using (like the ones suggested
below) and if t
At 05:53 AM 1/12/2005, you wrote:
Jill, will this be available as an upgrade to Imail for those with service
agreements, or will it only be in ICS?
This is an issue where IMail functions improperly and should be released as
a free patch not an upgrade IMHO.
-Original Message-
From: [EMA
Good point Sandymy apologies to the list
At 09:40 AM 12/14/2004, you wrote:
> This is something I feel strongly about but this list is really not
> the place to discuss politics..
If it's not, don't. This is completely inappropriate and makes any
debate about IMail add-on marketi
At 04:55 AM 12/14/2004, you wrote:
Doesn't the term "illegal" in the phrase "illegal aliens/immigrants"
(regardless of country of origin) mean that they are breaking the law
Yes, it does!
Since when do people get rewarded for breaking the law?
Ever since radical liberals have hijacked the demo
CTED]"<>
Travis
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:IMail_Forum-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gary Brumm
> Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004 4:24 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [IMail Forum] Check Valid Sender option
>
> I had a
I had a customer that was using AOL as an ISP and using Outlook configured
for AUTH SMTP on our server. He could not send to one particular user on
our server (in his domain) but could send to others. After testing I
noticed the following in the header:
X-Apparently-From: ERR_USER_NULL
It see
It doesn't update the mail.idx fileso should I delete the main.idx
files daily as well?
At 02:49 PM 11/11/2004, you wrote:
I don't expect immsgexp.exe to update main.idx.
Dave
In reply to 11 Nov message from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>Thanks Dave, that did it! Could it be caused by the immsgexp.exe
Thanks Dave, that did it! Could it be caused by the immsgexp.exe that I
run daily to remove messages older than 30 days
from the MBXs? Is it possible that it is trimming the messages in the
mail.mbx and that the main.idx is not updated?
If this is the case what would be the best way to fix this
ions of a madman.
The rest are mine.
--
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Behalf Of Gary Brumm
Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2004 2:25 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [IMail Forum] IMail Client
I was using the IMail Client app to c
I was using the IMail Client app to clean up a MBX and when I selected
several files to delete it corrupted the MBX. Also many of the
messages wouldn't open or a different message opened that was
selected. I haven't used this app foe a long time. Does it no
longer function with newer versions
True, but those companies can ~afford~ to piss off their
customers..IPSwitch can't.
Bad management (which seems to be the case here) can easily destroy a
company of their size.
At 12:54 PM 11/9/2004, you wrote:
William Van Hefner: "Give me a break!!! What other company does business
like thi
Precede the forwarded address with a period and a comma (.,)
Separate multiple addresses with a comma.
At 08:04 PM 11/8/2004, you wrote:
How does one keep the email in the box and forward email to another account.
So far all I can do is setup the forward and the mail just empties
automatically out
Also there is no way to exclude files/directories in the realtime scan AFAIK
At 06:38 AM 11/4/2004, you wrote:
I have f-prot on about 30 - 40 workstations and servers. It works. One
thing though I wish they would get around to disinfecting the viruses
during the real-time scans.
John
On Thu, 4 N
That's pretty much a non-answer..Why cant they just put it back for
sale as a standalone product and publish the price?
These kind of evasive answers don't inspire much trust in their company.
At 08:20 AM 11/2/2004, you wrote:
Here is Ipswitch's response on standalone pricing for IMail.
Darin
Thanks for the info Roger. I think we have everything completed. We were
already doing the DNS for the old server so
that saved a few steps. If we run into any problems I'll let you know.
Cheers,
Gary
At 07:24 PM 10/31/2004, you wrote:
Here is the way we move domains from one IMail server to a
- Original Message - From: "Gary Brumm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, October 31, 2004 6:58 PM
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Moving users to a new (existing) server
One more thing
Can I just take everything from the Domains branch and export i
ou can get back to where
you started just in case you miss something like I sometimes do.
Hope this helps
Eric S
- Original Message - From: "Gary Brumm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, October 31, 2004 6:06 PM
Subject: [IMail Forum] Moving us
ety's sake export your keys so you can get back to where
you started just in case you miss something like I sometimes do.
Hope this helps
Eric S
- Original Message ----- From: "Gary Brumm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, October 31, 2004 6:06
I have a customer who wants to move his IMail customers to a different
Imail server so he can shut his down. He is running the same version
(8.12) and has a separate IP for each domain (as we do). He sent me some
registry entries for his domains/users
[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Ipswitch\IMa
Here's one place you can express your "epinion"
http://www.epinions.com/Internet_Communication_Applications-Ipswitch
At 10:10 AM 10/28/2004, you wrote:
This is exactly what needs to happen. We need to get this story out. It
needs to be publicized so that Ipswitch sees that their reputatio
WarFTP Serverit's FREE and I have used it on many servers for the
last 5 or 6 years and it has been great.
http://support.jgaa.com/index.php?cmd=ShowProduct&ID=3&PHPSESSID=94c5a3f8ad6dd3ee1e45e3e4b96401c4
At 08:59 AM 10/28/2004, you wrote:
Anyone know of a
good and cheap FTP server I could
At 01:51 PM 10/27/2004, you wrote:
Well, that takes care of me wanting shared calendars for my office! Thank
you!
Yes but if you only need say a few of your users to share calendars with
WorkgroupShare you can buy only the licenses you need, you don't need to
buy their 250 user license which is
At 05:26 PM 10/26/2004, you wrote:
yahoogroups are terrible, if someone really wants a forum for all this I
can throw a section up on one of the many forums I run
however, you have to admit at least IPSwitch hasn't killed the discussion
yet...Gordano (NTMail) banned all discussion about it short
thread "new
subject - alternates" on all the pros/cons and options available.
Gary Brumm wrote:
When NTMail (Gordano) screwed there users like this a lot of them went to
a product called Surgermail
http://netwinsite.com/surgemail/ and claimed that it performed very well
under very h
When NTMail (Gordano) screwed there users like this a lot of them went to a
product called Surgermail
http://netwinsite.com/surgemail/ and claimed that it performed very well
under very heavy loads..
unfortunately I went to IMail instead and I now find myself in the same
situation all ov
At 08:27 PM 10/25/2004, you wrote:
So, does anyone have a way to retrieve user passwords for a migration?
There's a free password extractor at croftssoftware.com .
http://croftssoftware.com/downloads/Decode_IMail_Users_Password_Setup.exe
Gary
To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailin
Gordano did this to their customers who were using their NTMail
product. What started out as a ($795) great email server
evolved into a ($20,000) buggy piece of (poorly supported with very high $
service contracts) junk and many of their customers
left it for other products (as did I). When I s
At 10:35 PM 10/15/2004, you wrote:
On Saturday, October 16, 2004, 00:28:24, Gary Brumm wrote:
>>Best guess since you got it after the DATA is they didn't like something
>>in the message body. You'll have to ask them what their filtering
>>criteria are.
>
>
At 09:57 PM 10/15/2004, you wrote:
I just sent a message with nothing but "test" in the body and got the
same result.
could the subject contain something it doesn't like?
Subject:
is part of the DATA command, yes.
Len
Len,
I tried it with test in the subject and in the body and still got the same
I just sent a message with nothing but "test" in the body and got the same
result.
could the subject contain something it doesn't like?
Gary
At 07:55 PM 10/15/2004, you wrote:
10:15 17:34 SMTP-(6cae00b801c8b63d) >DATA
10:15 17:34 SMTP-(6cae00b801c8b63d) 354 Enter mail, end with "." on a
line by
At 08:09 PM 10/15/2004, you wrote:
On Friday, October 15, 2004, 22:24:25, Gary Brumm wrote:
> I get this response immediately when I try to send to anyone in this
domain.
> Is this just a problem on their end?
> ...
> 10:15 17:34 SMTP-(6cae00b801c8b63d) >DATA
> 10:15 17:34 SMTP
I get this response immediately when I try to send to anyone in this domain.
Is this just a problem on their end?
undeliverable to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Body of message generated response:
554 5.7.1 Command rejected
Here is the log of the transaction
10:15 17:34 SMTPD(6cae00b801c8b63d) Authenticated [E
I get this response immediately when I try to send to anyone in this domain.
Is this just a problem on their end?
undeliverable to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Body of message generated response:
554 5.7.1 Command rejected
Here is the log of the transaction
10:15 17:34 SMTPD(6cae00b801c8b63d) Authenticated [E
No question about itIMHO definitely Declude. We have used Declude
Virus (with F-Prot) for a couple years and it has performed extremely
well. We just added Declude JunkMail Pro and it is proving to be another
great product.
Gary
At 12:37 PM 10/12/2004, you wrote:
Hello --
We are in the pr
Pete, I am sure most of the people here agree with youas do I.
Cheers,
Gary
At 09:50 AM 9/10/2004, you wrote:
Well said, Pete.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: "Pete McNeil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Len Conrad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, September 10, 2004 12:42 PM
Subject: Re[2
At 08:37 AM 7/30/2004, you wrote:
With spammers abusing domains with tons of random recipients, the nobody
alias is more evil than a CIA terrorist analysis or a shrub "mission
accomplished" bumper sticker.
One of the biggest selling bumper stickers here is "Boycot France" and it's
a good one. W
Since it seems that all but a couple people would like to keep using this
list how about we just don't use
or contribute to the new web forum. Without the main contributors (you
know who you are) the forum will
be of no use and will probably be shut down. I think this would be a good
way to le
At 07:17 PM 7/15/2004, you wrote:
It's obviously that the mailing list is difficult. Most people even
don't know how to
subscribe and reply post.
If it is too difficult for someone to sign up on IPSwitch's website to
subscribe and then read the bottom
of EVERY message to unsubscribe they should pr
I have to agree with SandyIf ever there was a situation that called for
a "me too" response this
is certainly the time for it. Moving to the web forum format is a really
bad idea
Oh yeah I almost forgot.ME TOO :-)
Cheers
Gary
At 01:13 PM 7/15/2004, you wrote:
> I dont think w
Give Simple DNS a try
(www.jhsoft.com).
It will replace both the MS DHCP and Bind with a stable & secure (at
least in my experience) easy to manage solution. I have been
running this for a few years with absolutely no problems
whatsoever. They have a 30 day trial you can download and is very
Chris,
Take a look at
NetMailBot:
http://www.exclamationsoft.com/exclamationsoft/netmailbot/default.asp
It is a bit pricey but is very configurable and does POP3 and SMTP from the
command line.
Gary
At 07:35 AM 6/15/2004, you wrote:
Hi,
It's a bit off topic, but: I need a command line b
At 06:57 AM 3/15/2004, you wrote:
I want to block this IP range in the SMTP access control
66.117.0.0 - 66.117.31.255
Can someone tell me the proper subnet mask to use ?
255.255.224.0
Cris Porter
JVC America
To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://w
We are using a batch file with contig.exe (that was just posted by
Christopher Checca) to stop services,
defrag, and then restart the services. It runs via the scheduler, early in
the morning and only defrags the IMail directory.
We also use Diskeeper for everything else with the IMail directory
e
what I can do about having the programs fix that
automatically in the next release. Let me know if it
works.
Thanks!
Curt Turner
--- Gary Brumm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello Curt,
> I have downloaded and installed both of
> your utilities. They seem
> to merge the f
Hello Curt,
I have downloaded and installed both of your utilities. They seem
to merge the files just fine
but I get a "Run time error 75 Path/File access error" when it tries to
save the file. Any help you
can provide would be appreciated. These apps will be a real time
saver (as Tr
Sure, I will give it a try. We've used just about every other one out there.
Thanks,
Gary
At 06:58 AM 2/6/2004, you wrote:
Hello,
We have a log analyzer available for $295 that we are about to release. We
are looking for people who want to beta test it. Is anyone interested in a
free copy?
P
ers.
Thanks for the quick response!
Gary
Mike Barber
Software Tester
Ipswitch Inc.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Gary Brumm
Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 11:38 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [IMail Forum] X-IMAIL-SPAM-VALHELO
Good morn
MAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.0.22
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2003 07:13:10 -0800
To: Greg Falken <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Gary Brumm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Fwd: Important- Automated 5 day deactivation notice 2003-10-26
Mim
I have a customer with an exchange server that we are trying to find a good
anti virus & anti spam solution for.
If anyone has any recommendations or knows of products to avoid I would
like to hear from you.
You can respond directly off list if you like. Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Gary
Comse
Scott,
Take a look at http://jhsoft.com . Simple DNS has been working
for us for over 2 years without
a single problem. We used BIND before that and had all sorts of
problems. It's reasonably priced, fast,
and dependable.
Gary
At 11:03 AM 9/23/2003, you wrote:
Scott, I'm trying to p
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]
To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
Gary Brumm
Comse
I have the same problem. The tasks displayed for the first month then when
the month changed the tasks disappeared.
If I change the date back to that first month the tasks reappear. Has
anyone got a fix for this?
Thanks,
Gary
At 09:01 AM 7/25/2003, you wrote:
I am having a problem displaying
Travis,
I have a couple spare 2500 series Ciscos in my Stockton colo if
that would help.
You can contact me directly if that would help. I will be in North Shore
Tahoe in a couple
weeks and could pick it back up then.
Gary Brumm
At 10:41 PM 7/14/2003, you wrote:
Hello All,
I am in
90 matches
Mail list logo
