> Thank you for derailing this thing with a little humor. For a minute
> there, I thought I was reading SPAM-L! Geesh. ;-)
ROFLOL. I was on the SPAM-L list for about 3 months. Boy, that got old fast.
John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You
To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipsw
Device ???
This thread is getting strange!
Gary
- Original Message -
From: "Todd Holt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 2:35 PM
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] WTF?
See:
http://www.acronymfinder.com/af-query.asp?String=exact&
Ya but that one sounded the best.
Gary
- Original Message -
From: "Todd Holt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, October 31, 2003 10:23 AM
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] WTF?
> Keep looking, Gary. I could be wrong, but I don't th
WTF - "Whats This For"
Nicer that way, and let's kill this thread please.
~Rick
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott MacLean
Sent: Friday, October 31, 2003 11:00 AM - FamHost
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [I
e-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:IMail_Forum-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gary.Ferguson
> Sent: Friday, October 31, 2003 6:02 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] WTF?
>
> One from acronymfinder
>
> FUD - Female Urinary Device ???
>
>
lf Of Gary.Ferguson
> Sent: Friday, October 31, 2003 6:02 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] WTF?
>
> One from acronymfinder
>
> FUD - Female Urinary Device ???
>
> This thread is getting strange!
>
>
> Gary
>
> - Original Messag
One from acronymfinder
FUD - Female Urinary Device ???
This thread is getting strange!
Gary
- Original Message -
From: "Todd Holt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 2:35 PM
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum
f Randy Armbrecht
> Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 12:23 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] WTF?
>
> Isn't that the guy that hunts "wabbits" ?
>
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Randy Armbrecht
> BHHA
> 746-4882 home
> 382-5509 cell
&g
ect: RE: [IMail Forum] WTF?
What is FUD?
Mike
At 11:55 AM 10/30/2003, you wrote:
>>And contrary to your beliefs, Len, you're not always "right".
>
>and Scott's FUD is always right?
>
>> As useful
>>as I find your advice, I do find that in some
What is FUD?
Mike
At 11:55 AM 10/30/2003, you wrote:
And contrary to your beliefs, Len, you're not always "right".
and Scott's FUD is always right?
As useful
as I find your advice, I do find that in some situations, it doesn't
work for me.
Then stay out of the thread, since your own opinions
DAMNIT! Len and Scott will you two just knock it off?! Both of you take a
time out. Seriously!
I am one of the MANY people on this list that would probably be a Postini
subscriber if it was not for BOTH of you. You both have different approaches
to the same problem. Spam. It is our common enemy.
t would be the real shame in all of this.
Todd Holt
Xidix Technologies, Inc
Las Vegas, NV USA
www.xidix.com
702.319.4349
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:IMail_Forum-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Len Conrad
> Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 9:56 AM
>
And contrary to your beliefs, Len, you're not always "right".
and Scott's FUD is always right?
As useful
as I find your advice, I do find that in some situations, it doesn't
work for me.
Then stay out of the thread, since your own opinions are as
non-"right" as mine.
Len
__
9
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:IMail_Forum-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pete McNeil
> Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 7:48 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] WTF?
>
> Hopefully this thread can be stopped befor
Hopefully this thread can be stopped before it really gets going.
Scott Said:
|>That you know of. :)
|
Len Said:
|FUD. He knows what he knows, and his IMGate is not a disaster
|or wildly
|blocking tons of legit mail, or he nor anybody else would be using it.
Pete (madscientist says):
Peop
>> Out: 554 Service unavailable; [156.21.1.4] blocked using
>> blackholes.easynet.nl, reason: Blacklisted by easynet.nl DNSBL -
>> http://blackholes.easynet.nl/errors.html
>Doesn't that mean that your mailserver rejected the E-mail, so that you
>can't check to see what the E-mail was?
t
I'm sorry Scott, it was not my intention to cause offense. If i have then i
apologise.
No offense taken. I just wanted to point out one of the drawbacks of
blocking non-spams.
>You receive 600 E-mails a day and trap 140. But what if 40 of those 140
>are non-spams?
i know they are spam because
>So what happens? My time has been wasted, as has yours. You probably
>think I didn't bother responding, so you get a bad impression of me. But
>the big problem occurs when too many people start doing this ("critical
>mass"). At that point, I say "screw this" and walk away, no longer
>offering
gt;
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 8:34 AM
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] WTF?
>
> >As you can see, anyone can make it into a single blacklist.
>
> sh!t happens
>
> > Just about every spam database has had at least one false positive
>
> and this is some kind of ca
As you can see, anyone can make it into a single blacklist.
sh!t happens
Just about every spam database has had at least one false positive
and this is some kind of catastrophe to be avoided at all costs?
and just about every legitimate mailserver has made it into at least one
spam database a
>Well, the first thing that is ironic is that you are blocking mail from
>Ipswitch.
I know - i just never bothered to put ipswitch in a whitelist because i
never thought they would get blacklisted ;-)
As you can see, anyone can make it into a single blacklist. Just about
every spam database ha
>Well, the first thing that is ironic is that you are blocking mail from
>Ipswitch.
I know - i just never bothered to put ipswitch in a whitelist because i
never thought they would get blacklisted ;-)
>We *strongly* urge our customers (and non-customers, too!)
>never to block E-mail based on
am i sensing irony here?
In: RCPT To:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Out: 554 Service unavailable; [156.21.1.4] blocked using
blackholes.easynet.nl, reason: Blacklisted by easynet.nl DNSBL -
http://blackholes.easynet.nl/errors.html
Well, the first thing that is ironic is that you are blocking ma
am i sensing irony here?
Out: 220 hippo.mlmuk.com ESMTP Postfix - ATTN: UCE Trespassers will be
pursued
In: EHLO cs.ipswitch.com
Out: 250-hippo.mlmuk.com
Out: 250-PIPELINING
Out: 250-SIZE 1024
Out: 250-ETRN
Out: 250 8BITMIME
In: MAIL FROM:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Out: 250 Ok
In: RCPT To
ubject: RE: [IMail Forum] WTF
>
>
> Internet? Earthquake? What's this about?
>
> ~Rick
>
> >
> >
> > I am still here, for better or worse. (City of Industry, CA)
> >
> >
ECTED] On Behalf Of Rick Leske
> Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 2:01 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] WTF
>
> Internet? Earthquake? What's this about?
>
> ~Rick
>
> >
> >
> > I am still here, for better or worse. (City of Indus
Internet? Earthquake? What's this about?
~Rick
>
>
> I am still here, for better or worse. (City of Industry, CA)
>
> >
> > Looks liek Souterhn Cal and San Diego just took a big fat dump
>
>
___
Virus Scanned and Filtered by ht
day, June 10, 2003 1:23 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ipswitch. com
> Subject: [IMail Forum] WTF
>
> Looks liek Souterhn Cal and San Diego just took a big fat dump
>
>
> -
> Travis Rabe
> Technology Director
> The Davidson Group
>
Tuesday, June 10, 2003 1:23 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ipswitch. com
> Subject: [IMail Forum] WTF
>
>
> Looks liek Souterhn Cal and San Diego just took a big fat dump
>
>
> -
> Travis Rabe
> Technology Director
> The Davidson Gr
. com
> Subject: [IMail Forum] WTF
>
>
> Looks liek Souterhn Cal and San Diego just took a big fat dump
>
>
> -
> Travis Rabe
> Technology Director
> The Davidson Group
> (775) 832-8314 x108
>
> To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswit
Looks liek Souterhn Cal and San Diego just took a big fat dump
-
Travis Rabe
Technology Director
The Davidson Group
(775) 832-8314 x108
To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.
Chet,
> This is incorrect. After looking at the security tab I should have
> clarified (thought I did in my first post, guess not) I have disable
> smtp auth reporting checked.
You did not have this checked yesterday or the day before, so I'm
assuming you just turned it on. You are
This is incorrect. After looking at the security tab I should
have clarified (thought I did in my first post, guess not) I have
disable smtp auth reporting checked. So I can send since I am
local on the network, but no user can connect in and send even if
they include the smtp login informat
> We are not an isp. We are a semi-free web mail. Users can use pop3
> to pickup the mail, but they cannot relay through our servers
> because they would not be in the correct ip block.
Your server is open for SMTP, and AUTH is enabled. Hence, anyone with
local login credentials can re
>> > Here's a kicker.. have you ever wondered why companies like
>> hotmail/yahoo/aol.. never get listed?
>>Go to http://www.rfc-ignorant.org -- they are listed there. :)
>
>Not to fuel the fire.. but I'm missing something.. when i check the link
>above it dumps to a page
Yes, every web site
R. Scott Perry wrote:
> [Responding to several comments]
>
>> The whole block? pretty loose rules.
>
>
> Several of the spam databases list huge blocks -- in your case,
> http://www.spambag.org/cgi-bin/spambag?record=sprintlink shows that they
> block a whole /12 range (4,096 class C ranges)
>Several of the spam databases list huge blocks -- in your case,
>http://www.spambag.org/cgi-bin/spambag?record=sprintlink shows that they
>block a whole /12 range (4,096 class C ranges). These (SPAMBAG, XBL, and
>a couple others) just aren't used to block spam. They are used to get
>people
>Just FYI , if you are using Imail' Webmail, I have an ASP script that can
>send about 100 spams/ minute automatically by hacking the webmail... So
>perhaps one spammer used a script like this and transformed you in an open
>relay ;o(
but wouldn't the asp script have to be installed on a cracked
[Responding to several comments]
>The whole block? pretty loose rules.
Several of the spam databases list huge blocks -- in your case,
http://www.spambag.org/cgi-bin/spambag?record=sprintlink shows that they
block a whole /12 range (4,096 class C ranges). These (SPAMBAG, XBL, and a
couple ot
s" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, June 01, 2002 7:17 AM
Subject: [IMail Forum] WTF? Spambag and postfix.
> We are not an open relay 63.172.199.25 - we are very anti-spam and
> do not allow our users to even relay with smtp auth. We are
> runn
We are not an isp. We are a semi-free web mail. Users can use
pop3 to pickup the mail, but they cannot relay through our servers
because they would not be in the correct ip block. They only way
to send through our servers is to log into the web interface.
Since I am the only person currentl
> We...do not allow our users to even relay with smtp auth.
You don't? Do you catch this with rules?
I'm not questioning your abuse by the blacklists, just asking for
clarification on this point.
-Sandy
Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
to be removed from t
I agree Chet,
Here's a kicker.. have you ever wondered why companies like
hotmail/yahoo/aol.. never get listed? hmm.. must be the big bucks and
killer lawyers huh?
~Rick
___
Virus Scanned and Filtered by http://www.FamHost.com E
-- Original Message --
From: Rick Leske <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 01 Jun 2002 01:02:07 -0500
>discuss wrote:
>
>> We are not an open relay 63.172.199.25 - we are very anti-spam
and
>> do not allow our users to even rel
now how many emails being sent everyday?
>Just curios,
>Thanks,
>Serhan.
>
>- Original Message -
>From: "discuss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Saturday, June 01, 2002 1:17 AM
>Subject: [IMail Forum] WTF? Spambag and postfix.
>
: [IMail Forum] WTF? Spambag and postfix.
discuss wrote:
> We are not an open relay 63.172.199.25 - we are very anti-spam and
> do not allow our users to even relay with smtp auth. We are
> running and have been running imail 7.06 - no upgrades or changes
> recently, we have had th
discuss wrote:
> We are not an open relay 63.172.199.25 - we are very anti-spam and
> do not allow our users to even relay with smtp auth. We are
> running and have been running imail 7.06 - no upgrades or changes
> recently, we have had the exact same setup for years.
>
> We have never been
-
From: "discuss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, June 01, 2002 1:17 AM
Subject: [IMail Forum] WTF? Spambag and postfix.
> We are not an open relay 63.172.199.25 - we are very anti-spam and
> do not allow our users to even relay with smtp aut
We are not an open relay 63.172.199.25 - we are very anti-spam and
do not allow our users to even relay with smtp auth. We are
running and have been running imail 7.06 - no upgrades or changes
recently, we have had the exact same setup for years.
We have never been an open relay. Never. Nev
I can't quite figure it out myself. I am running the Classic Templates from HKSI and
I put my ads right into the templates themselves. Right now I am trying to figure out
the ad support for the calendars and I can't get it to work. Maybe a message to ROn
from HKSI. Is there an easy way to p
Still waiting on a response... I did restart the services and its ver. 6.06
Thanks
>
> -- Original Message --
> From: "Matthew Lohr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2001 12:40:34 -0400
>
> >what version of IMail? And
sdsdsdsdsdsd
-- Original Message --
From: "Matthew Lohr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2001 12:40:34 -0400
>what version of IMail? And did you stop and restart the services
after ward
>-- Original Message
Its Ver 6.06 and yes i did.
- Original Message -
From: "Matthew Lohr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 11:40 AM
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] WTF?
> what version of IMail? And did you stop and restart the services after
w
what version of IMail? And did you stop and restart the services after ward
-- Original Message --
From: "-=RaYgE=-" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2001 09:22:16 -0500
>This is the 3rd time Ive postedt his.. could someon
This is the 3rd time Ive postedt his.. could someone help me
here?
How can i get add support to actually WORK? I check add support and put
ininfo for a banner or an image or a link, or even just some text and
itdoesnt show un in teh webmail.HElp
55 matches
Mail list logo
