We're running IMail Version 8.0. Lately, 1 out of 10 emails sent out gets returned and flagged as "Undeliverable Mail" and the email address as "unknown user". These are confirmed email addresses that we commonly exchange emails with. The front ends are using Outlook 2003 and Outlook Express 6.0,
Any thoughts or suggestions would greatly be appreciated.
Your logs are your friend.
--Sandy
Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist
Broadleaf Systems, a division of
Cypress Integrated Systems, Inc.
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SpamAssassin plugs into Declude!
, 2005 8:37 PM
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Win2k server hacked
Servers that are hacked often need to be rebuilt.
John T
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:IMail_Forum-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of dkaleky
Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2005 4:18 PM
we have all the latest updates- by win2k and imail
iis was off, and ftp--
Most services were not running
They put a irc on server...
I have to turn on iis and ftp---
Any ideas?
To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive:
: Tuesday, April 05, 2005 4:18 PM
To: IMail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: [IMail Forum] Win2k server hacked
we have all the latest updates- by win2k and imail
iis was off, and ftp--
Most services were not running
They put a irc on server...
I have to turn on iis and ftp---
Any ideas
Servers that are hacked often need to be rebuilt.
John T
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:IMail_Forum-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of dkaleky
Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2005 4:18 PM
To: IMail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: [IMail Forum] Win2k
entirely, or they're using CDONTS, which is just plain bad and should
be migrated to the CDO Library instead, since it has basically
nonexistent internal logging.
How does one go about replacing CDONTS with the CDO Library?
Mike
Please visit
]] On Behalf Of Sanford
Whiteman
Sent: Sunday, February 03, 2002 6:57 PM
To: Dan Frazer - Crystaltech
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Win2k SMTP logging (a bit off topic)
I'm assuming it is from a formmail script.
Sounds reasonable enough. If so, they're either using a separate CGI
(ASPmail, etc.), which you
I have a webserver with SMTP set to relay only for the local IP. I have
one person who is sending emails out that I want to stop, but I'm having
no luck figuring out who it is. I tried a bunch of different logging
methods and none of them return any info that would help me track down
where the
I'm assuming it is from a formmail script.
Sounds reasonable enough. If so, they're either using a separate CGI
(ASPmail, etc.), which you either could turn on logging for or delete
entirely, or they're using CDONTS, which is just plain bad and should
be migrated to the CDO Library
Uh-oh typo (I'll bet) 110 is the POP3 port. Looks like I'm not the only one
with "Fat Fingers" :-)
Eric S
- Original Message -
From: "Len Conrad" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2001 5:19 PM
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Win2K IIS
Uh-oh typo (I'll bet) 110 is the POP3 port. Looks like I'm not the only one
with "Fat Fingers" :-)
hmmm, I had something on my mind, and my fingers were on their own. :))
Len
http://BIND8NT.MEIway.com : Binary for ISC BIND 8.2.3 for NT4 W2K
http://IMGate.MEIway.com : Build free, hi-perf,
I'd like to run the Win2K IIS Default SMTP server concurrently with the
IMAIL SMTP server on the same box. This would allow me to configure the
Win2K server to listen on another port (such as 111) for those users who
can't connect on port 25 due to ISP port filtering.
Is this feasible? The
I'd like to run the Win2K IIS Default SMTP server concurrently with the
IMAIL SMTP server on the same box. This would allow me to configure the
Win2K server to listen on another port (such as 111) for those users who
can't connect on port 25 due to ISP port filtering.
Is this feasible?
yes
I'd like to run the Win2K IIS Default SMTP server concurrently with the
IMAIL SMTP server on the same box. This would allow me to configure the
Win2K server to listen on another port (such as 111) for those users who
can't connect on port 25 due to ISP port filtering.
Is this feasible? The
I'd like to run the Win2K IIS Default SMTP server concurrently with
the IMAIL SMTP server on the same box. This would allow me to
configure the Win2K server to listen on another port (such as 111)
for those users who can't connect on port 25 due to ISP port
filtering.
That should work (in
Thanks for all of the good info Len,
The Win2K server offers SMTP Auth
where does it get the username and password, from the W2K user accounts?
Yes, it gets it from the user accounts. It also offers encrypted
authentication.
My source of confusion on the "ports" question arises from the
However, I'm still quite confused about setting the output TCP port.
Only one port number can be designated in the setup (not a range,
such as all port over 1025).
Don't worry about that; just set it to 25. That technically isn't the output port; MS
will pick that one automatically from a
Thanks for the clarification, Scott
- Original Message -
From: "Scott Perry" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2001 6:29 PM
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Win2K IIS Default SMTP server
However, I'm still quite confused about setting the
At 10:20 PM 12/9/2000 +0100, Len Conrad wrote:
Let me ask this Len, I want to use IMail (mainly for the web
message). But I am fearful of hard drive crashing and loosing the messages.
I wanted to use win2k for the clustering feature to cluster 3 servers
having access to the data drive via
Let me ask this Len, I want to use IMail (mainly for the web
message). But I am fearful of hard drive crashing and loosing the messages.
Then use RAID 1, mirroring, and mirror in hardware, not the OS.
That's an easy solution.
I wanted to use win2k for the clustering feature to cluster 3
onrad
Sent: Monday, December 11, 2000 11:46 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Win2k - Imail - Redunancy
Let me ask this Len, I want to use IMail (mainly for the web
message). But I am fearful of hard drive crashing and loosing the
messages.
Then use RAID 1, mirroring,
Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 11, 2000 4:15 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Win2k - Imail - Redunancy
It seems to me your primary goal is to create a mail system that has no
single point of failure, and secondarily, to scale.
If so, then two dual/quad processor
Our goal is to make all 3 domain controllers w/ Active Directory
what's the point of AD? this is a corporate system or a public mail system?
and share the External raidbox for data storage.
what RAID? 5? 0+1 is recommended for speed.
Run the imail spool (logging + mail queue) and the
Hi,
We are thinking of installing the following:
a) 3 - Win2k Server
b) External RaidBox (7 9.1GB SCA)
c) Cluster all 3 servers
Our goal is to make all 3 domain controllers w/ Active Directory and share
the External raidbox for data storage. We will run Imail as the mail
server and our
I am running it on both Advanced Server and Serverso far so good.
- Original Message -
From: "David Santeramo" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 14, 2000 3:31 PM
Subject: [IMail Forum] win2K
Does Imail version 5 and 6 work with W2K server?
I'm running IMail 6.02, now upgraded to 6.04 -- both versions run
fine with W2K Server.
Gordon Williams
Michigan State University
-
David Santeramo wrote:
Does Imail version 5 and 6 work with W2K server? Any
known bugs that I would have to be aware of.
thanks
I had to install SP1 out of necessity to solve another problem we were
having. IMail seems to work just fine with it, no problems whatsoever.
At 03:15 AM 08/01/2000, List Server wrote:
Anyone have any diffculties with SP1 and Imail yet?
I won't be installing it for at least a month.
tom
Anyone out there running Imail on Win2k? If so, do they get along ok?
John Calhoun
Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
to be removed from this list.
Working great on this end. Other then the Attachment bug which isn't a Win2k issue
and the fact i can't seem to get SQL connection made (i don't even know how and the
doc's are very very 'stripped' in this area). Other then those.. its running fine and
dandy here.
-- Original
Even if no one has a solution, are others having this issue?
Or am I just a little whacked
-dk
-Original Message-
From: Dustin Krysak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: January 7, 2000 9:24 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: [IMail Forum] Win2k - OT
I never thought of this, but I
I never thought of this, but I guess I can ask it here Sorry about the
off topic questions...
For anyone here, have they seen policy related restrictions applied
automatically? For example... I'm a domain admin on our network... and on
every machine that I have installed Win2K, I have no
32 matches
Mail list logo
