-2211 x210
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Moody" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, June 11, 2004 8:15 AM
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] anti-spam software, recommendations?
> Thanks for the great feedback!
>
To Unsubscribe: http://www.ips
), when
it does choke it usually comes right back up, have had no problems with it.
Scott
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Moody
Sent: Friday, June 11, 2004 7:15 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] anti-spa
u
probably have a very small amount of redundancy insurance with that server.
- Original Message -
From: "Grant Griffith - IMail" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, June 11, 2004 8:38 AM
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] anti-spam software, recommendat
As much as I'd wish our ISP would police their own mail server at least as
well as we police ours, I can't make them. The boss is scared that not
having a backup means he'll lose email, although I agree, we haven't needed
it yet.
Be aware, though, that this can backfire on you. We used to have a
We've been running GFI MailEssentials for about a month, and it's working
very well, and fairly cheap depending on number of users. About 60% of our
mail is caught spam.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Moody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 11, 2004 7:16 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECT
Any comments on if it might be OK to run without a backup MX for a month or
two?
You should be fine. If a mailserver doesn't wait a reasonable amount of
time for your mailserver to go back up, it's really an issue on their
end. Some people do silly things like only retrying E-mail once (or not
Hi Chris,
> I work for a small company running Imail 8.11. Stemming the flood of spam
is
> becoming increasingly difficult with the tools built into Imail. I haven't
> seen any working benefit to word normalization, my whole reason for
> upgrading from 8.05. :(
>
> The gold standard seems to be De
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Grant Griffith -
IMail
Sent: Friday, June 11, 2004 7:39 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] anti-spam software, recommendations?
Just to make sure I am thinking correctly, if you do not have a backup MX
then the sending server will j
Thanks for the great feedback!
As much as I'd wish our ISP would police their own mail server at least as
well as we police ours, I can't make them. The boss is scared that not
having a backup means he'll lose email, although I agree, we haven't needed
it yet. Regardless, I already suggested drop
AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] anti-spam software, recommendations?
>The gold standard seems to be Declude Standard version, but the price tag
is
>too hefty for me to push through with the boss (he wants to stop the spam,
>but doesn't want to spend the money on
The gold standard seems to be Declude Standard version, but the price tag is
too hefty for me to push through with the boss (he wants to stop the spam,
but doesn't want to spend the money on tools to stop it, go figure.) Declude
Late doesn't offer multi-hop support which seems to be a good chunk o
On Friday, June 11, 2004, 8:15:49 AM, Chris wrote:
CM> The gold standard seems to be Declude Standard version, but the price tag is
CM> too hefty for me to push through with the boss (he wants to stop the spam,
CM> but doesn't want to spend the money on tools to stop it, go figure.) Declude
CM> La
12 matches
Mail list logo
