But Panda imap is simply not available. Therefore, UW-Imap is effectively
non-existent.
I was a long time fan of UW-imap, but Dovecot (with maildir backend) is
probably the way go.
My 2 cents.
-Original Message-
From: imap-uw-boun...@mailman2.u.washington.edu
[mailto:imap-uw-boun...@mai
Mon 01 Jun 2009 04:49:30 GMT
Mark Crispin wrote:
> On Sun, 31 May 2009, Aaron W. LaFramboise wrote:
>> Given this state of affairs, is there some particular piece of
>> software that you would recommend we switch to?
>
> Panda IMAP:
> http://panda.com/imap/
>
> Cyrus IMAP:
> http://cyrusi
On Mon, 1 Jun 2009, Mike Peachey wrote:
While I don't personally advocate its use, I find it hilarious you
failed to mention Courier IMAP :)
Courier is quite non-compliant with the IMAP specification:
http://imapwiki.org/ImapTest/ServerStatus
Its author is on record as refusing to fix t
On Sun, 31 May 2009, Chris Picciotto wrote:
But Panda imap is simply not available.
Several sites run Panda IMAP. It is available.
Therefore, UW-Imap is effectively
non-existent.
The one statement does not follow from the other, but that doesn't matter.
UW is indeed out of the IMAP busine
After completing a major update of our NetApp NFS mounted mbox format
based mail system over a year ago to iSCSI based MIX folders (behind a
perdition proxy) I have no desire to switch again from something that is
working perfectly for 60K users. Panda imap was available to me when I
simply ask