On Fri, 22 May 2009, Andrew Daviel wrote:
If in Thunderbird the option "server supports folders which can contain
both folders and messages" is checked
No client should ever have, or need, such a configuration option. This is
handled by the IMAP protocol.
With the option set, the GUI has a sin
On Thu, 21 May 2009, Mark Crispin wrote:
On Thu, 21 May 2009, Andrew Daviel wrote:
If in Thunderbird the option "server supports folders which can contain
both folders and messages" is checked
No client should ever have, or need, such a configuration option. This is
handled by the IMAP prot
On Thu, 21 May 2009, Andrew Daviel wrote:
If in Thunderbird the option "server supports folders which can contain both
folders and messages" is checked
No client should ever have, or need, such a configuration option. This is
handled by the IMAP protocol.
(the default, which is true for MIX
On Thu, 14 May 2009, Mark Crispin wrote:
On Thu, 14 May 2009, Andrew Daviel wrote:
5 unsubscribe "Trash/test/"
5 NO Not subscribed to mailbox Trash/test/
- at this point, Trash/test/ has disappeared from the filesystem, but there
is still an entry Trash/test in .mailboxlist.
Look at the abov
On Thu, 21 May 2009, Andrew Daviel wrote:
I had thought subscriptions vaguely useful - if a user has a lot of
archived mail - e.g. 10 folders "1990", "1991" etc. - that they don't
want cluttering up the folder list, they may unsubscribe from them. If
they then login with a different client, th
On Thu, 14 May 2009, Mark Crispin wrote:
The ONLY valid use for subscriptions is if a server exports netnews groups or
similar functionality. This allows the user to keep a list of which
newsgroups he is subscribed to. Now that netnews is effectively dead, the
purpose and use of IMAP subsc
On Thu, 14 May 2009, Brian Hayden wrote:
Just to be explicit, the moral of the story is that using subscriptions is
not a good idea because every client is stupid in their handling of subs, and
worse, they're all stupid in slightly different ways.
Correct.
The ONLY valid use for subscriptions
On May 14 2009, Mark Crispin wrote:
On Thu, 14 May 2009, Andrew Daviel wrote:
5 unsubscribe "Trash/test/"
5 NO Not subscribed to mailbox Trash/test/
- at this point, Trash/test/ has disappeared from the filesystem, but
there
is still an entry Trash/test in .mailboxlist.
Look at the above ve
On Thu, 14 May 2009, Andrew Daviel wrote:
5 unsubscribe "Trash/test/"
5 NO Not subscribed to mailbox Trash/test/
- at this point, Trash/test/ has disappeared from the filesystem, but there
is still an entry Trash/test in .mailboxlist.
Look at the above very carefully.
imapd says that Trash/te
On Thu, 2009-05-14 at 12:17 -0700, Andrew Daviel wrote:
> 5 unsubscribe "Trash/test/"
> 5 NO Not subscribed to mailbox Trash/test/
> 6 logout
..
> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=357911
> I submitted 414101 now marked as a duplicate
I've also had https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.
We have a problem with users trying to delete folders using Thunderbird.
Part of it is a TB problem IMO (some discussion with Mark a while back;
TB is trying to delete an open folder without deselecting it).
However, another issue seems to be that imapd is not unsubscribing from
the deleted
11 matches
Mail list logo
