On Thu, 21 May 2009, Mark Crispin wrote:
On Thu, 21 May 2009, Andrew Daviel wrote:
If in Thunderbird the option server supports folders which can contain
both folders and messages is checked
No client should ever have, or need, such a configuration option. This is
handled by the IMAP
On Fri, 22 May 2009, Andrew Daviel wrote:
If in Thunderbird the option server supports folders which can contain
both folders and messages is checked
No client should ever have, or need, such a configuration option. This is
handled by the IMAP protocol.
With the option set, the GUI has a
On Thu, 21 May 2009, Andrew Daviel wrote:
If in Thunderbird the option server supports folders which can contain both
folders and messages is checked
No client should ever have, or need, such a configuration option. This is
handled by the IMAP protocol.
(the default, which is true for MIX)
We have a problem with users trying to delete folders using Thunderbird.
Part of it is a TB problem IMO (some discussion with Mark a while back;
TB is trying to delete an open folder without deselecting it).
However, another issue seems to be that imapd is not unsubscribing from
the deleted
On May 14 2009, Mark Crispin wrote:
On Thu, 14 May 2009, Andrew Daviel wrote:
5 unsubscribe Trash/test/
5 NO Not subscribed to mailbox Trash/test/
- at this point, Trash/test/ has disappeared from the filesystem, but
there
is still an entry Trash/test in .mailboxlist.
Look at the above
On Thu, 14 May 2009, Brian Hayden wrote:
Just to be explicit, the moral of the story is that using subscriptions is
not a good idea because every client is stupid in their handling of subs, and
worse, they're all stupid in slightly different ways.
Correct.
The ONLY valid use for