Glynn Foster a écrit :
> Have a play with the mockup, tell me what you think!
I'm not thrilled about the colors. I find the overall shades are cold,
gloomy.
Also, does the content have to be so narrow and pixel-based? I've got a
20" LCD, only to get the same browsing experience as when I had a 14
> > Thus, a sincere plea: When Indiana is officially
> released, please, please
> > make sure to include Firefox 3. If not for
> anything else, the OpenSolaris LiveCD will
> > at least lend itself as a very pleasant web
> browser. Thanks.
>
> Unfortunately it's a little too late for Firefox 3
> (
Sorry, I really should hold my comments until I have had a chance to play with
the new image which is supposed to come out tomorrow (?) as per:
http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=57602&tstart=0
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
> I'm not thrilled about the colors. I find the overall
> shades are cold,
> gloomy.
As I posted in website-discuss: Is there a version with the "fiery" color
scheme? I think it'd look nicer, because they're warm colors.
-mg
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
_
> >
> http://www.gnome.org/~gman/opensolaris-new/index.html
>
> The snappy simple front page is a good way to do
> things, but the logo weirds me out.
>
> Have you been to the 70s? I know things get revived
> over time in the art world, but I think my parents
> have a vinyl-covered baby changi
Hi Barbara,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Indiana Participants:
>
> 1) Please review the documentation that we are developing for
> OpenSolaris 2008.05 release, and email your edits and comments to us by
> Friday, 4/25. Feedback received after 4/25 may not be integrated in time
> for the May rel
On 16 Apr 2008, at 18:37, Richard Elling wrote:
>>
>> * Given the 50/50 split between the two most popular choices, we
>> probably ought to consider adding a simple first-time-login layout
>> chooser. (Given the timescales, this would most likely have to
>> happen post-1.0, though.)
>>
* W. Wayne Liauh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-04-17 18:00]:
> But perhaps you can at least try to tweak the font options in FF2. My
> suggestion is, use sans-serif font as default, add and make DejuVu
> sans as the default font for sans-serif, specify a minimum font size
> of at least 16, and uncheck
Harumpf!
Calum Benson wrote:
>
> On 16 Apr 2008, at 18:37, Richard Elling wrote:
>
>>>
>>> * Given the 50/50 split between the two most popular choices, we
>>> probably ought to consider adding a simple first-time-login layout
>>> chooser. (Given the timescales, this would most likely have to
Stephen Hahn wrote:
> * W. Wayne Liauh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-04-17 18:00]:
>> But perhaps you can at least try to tweak the font options in FF2. My
>> suggestion is, use sans-serif font as default, add and make DejuVu
>> sans as the default font for sans-serif, specify a minimum font size
>>
Calum Benson wrote:
On 16 Apr 2008, at 18:37, Richard Elling wrote:
* Given the 50/50 split between the two most popular choices, we
probably ought to consider adding a simple first-time-login layout
chooser. (Given the timescales, this would most likely have to
ha
Richard Elling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Calum Benson wrote:
>> On 11 Apr 2008, at 08:50, Calum Benson wrote:
>>
>>> Just realised I forgot to post the results-- been a bit distracted
>>> with the CHI conference in Florence this week.
>>>
>>> The result of the vote was:
>>>
>>> 1. Bottom pa
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 2:01 AM, Glynn Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey,
>
> As opensolaris.com starts to focus more on the 'download, install and run'
> experience, catering towards the consumer rather than the producer, a few
> people
> in Sun have been working on a design separate to
On 17 Apr 2008, at 20:57, Richard Elling wrote:
> Harumpf!
>
> Calum Benson wrote:
>>
>> On 16 Apr 2008, at 18:37, Richard Elling wrote:
>>
>> I'm with you 100% on choosing good defaults and not asking
>> unnecessary
>> questions. But there is no such preference in this case, so
>> completely
On 17 Apr 2008, at 21:34, Frank Ludolph wrote:
>
> I suggest that many users, not just new ones, might be baffled by
> this question since they might not be familiar with both
> alternatives. This becomes a very *difficult* question if there
> isn't an easy way to change the decision later.
Barbara --
I'm new to the group, but I'm an old Sun hand and would like to
suggest the following:
"The OpenSolaris OS will install only onto ZFS, not UFS. The single
ZFS pool installed
will initially consist of the entire Solaris fdisk partition of the
disk identified
at installation. T
Mario Goebbels wrote:
>> I'm not thrilled about the colors. I find the overall
>> shades are cold,
>> gloomy.
>
> As I posted in website-discuss: Is there a version with the "fiery" color
> scheme? I think it'd look nicer, because they're warm colors.
Sun has decided to go with the multi-color
> On the RC1 image I just installed, the preferences
> show the defaults are
> "Times", "Helvetica", and "Courier", which leads to
> the default text being
> non-anti-aliased - like you, I thought the firefox
> team was fixing that.
>
> The default fonts in GNOME apps/fontconfig are the
> Deja Vu
Looks quite good to me. I like the new logo quite a lot.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
indiana-discuss mailing list
indiana-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss
19 matches
Mail list logo
