On Nov 2, 2007 10:17 PM, jan damborsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Shawn Walker wrote:
> > On 02/11/2007, Qingye Jiang (John) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> When I try to shutdown Indiana as a regular user, there is a warning
> >> saying that I don't have the privilege to shutdown my machine.
On Nov 2, 2007 11:30 PM, Aubrey Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 2, 2007 10:48 PM, jan damborsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi Aubrey,
> >
> >
> > Aubrey Li wrote:
> > > It's very exciting to see indiana preview out! Pretty pretty goo
It's very exciting to see indiana preview out! Pretty pretty good.
I have a try on my IBM-T42 XP + VMWARE6.0,
It seems so far everyting works fine except I didn't find the network.
I'm using the Bridged Networking in VMWARE.
"ifconfig -a" only show me the loopback device.
Sorry if it's a known is
On Nov 2, 2007 10:48 PM, jan damborsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Aubrey,
>
>
> Aubrey Li wrote:
> > It's very exciting to see indiana preview out! Pretty pretty good.
> >
>
> Glad to hear that ;-) Thank you very much for trying.
>
> > I hav
On Nov 2, 2007 11:46 PM, Aubrey Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Nov 2, 2007 11:30 PM, Aubrey Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Nov 2, 2007 10:48 PM, jan damborsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hi Aubrey,
> > >
> > >
> &g
On Nov 3, 2007 1:22 AM, Sara Dornsife <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> We talked about a flying pig as a potential community mascot at the Summit.
> No graphics have been created.
> Sara
>
>
>
Just wonder, the pig is flying over a background, which is used
popularly on windows XP.
Does this picture
On Nov 3, 2007 11:00 AM, Sara Dornsife <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> It doesn't actually exist... let's imagine it in a cape with wings flying
> over a frozen hell
> :)
:D
>
>
>
> Aubrey Li wrote:
> On Nov 3, 2007 1:22 AM, Sara Dornsife <[E
On Nov 3, 2007 8:19 AM, Glynn Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Can't wait for new packages! For now, pkgadd -d x fails :(
>
> This one is logged already, and hopefully will be fixed soon enough.
>
> http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=110
>
>
When it is fixed, how to apply
On Nov 3, 2007 1:01 PM, Richard Nekus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...so Indiana installed quite easily, from LiveCD to Install an disk on my PC
> Desktop.
> everything looks good from here, obviously, since I'm posting.
> Is there a way to easily install/compile packages here?. I've tried the
>
Since pkg is broken, is it possbile to build the newest kernel source
code from mercurial repo and upgrade my system?
Since the specific build tools SUNWonbld.i386.tar.bz2 has to be
installed by pkg, I even didn't have a try.
Any hints?
Thanks,
-Aubrey
_
On Nov 5, 2007 1:05 PM, Brandorr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please enter a number between 1 and 15:
>
> [5] 11
>
> Unable to copy the source file
> /usr/lib/vmware-tools/configurator/autostart-vmware-user.sh to the destination
> file /usr/dt/config/Xsession.d/.autostart-vmware-user.sh.
>
> Ex
On Nov 8, 2007 10:12 AM, Sanjay Nadkarni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Shawn Walker wrote:
> > On 07/11/2007, Aubrey Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> One of my colleagues complains Indiana can't install on his 256M-memory
> >> box.
> &
On Nov 8, 2007 1:51 PM, Shawn Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 07/11/2007, Aubrey Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Nov 8, 2007 11:23 AM, Martin Bochnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Aubrey Li wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Let me
One of my colleagues complains Indiana can't install on his 256M-memory box.
He said the Indiana installer demands at least 512M memory, is that true?
If so, can this issue be worked around?
Thanks,
-Aubrey
___
indiana-discuss mailing list
indiana-discus
On Nov 8, 2007 10:32 AM, Martin Bochnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Aubrey Li wrote:
> > On Nov 8, 2007 10:12 AM, Sanjay Nadkarni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Shawn Walker wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 07/11/2007, Aubrey Li <[E
On Nov 8, 2007 11:23 AM, Martin Bochnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Aubrey Li wrote:
> >
> > Let me clarify my question, why installer stop the user to install
> > Indiana on a less-512MB system? The miniroot currently is IPSed set of
> > packages. I can remove a
On Nov 8, 2007 12:32 PM, Moinak Ghosh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Sanjay Nadkarni wrote:
> > Aubrey Li wrote:
> >
> >> On Nov 8, 2007 10:12 AM, Sanjay Nadkarni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>> Shawn Walker wrote:
On Nov 9, 2007 2:21 AM, Sanjay Nadkarni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Marty Duey wrote:
> > On 11/8/2007 9:37 AM, Shawn Walker wrote:
> >
> >> On 08/11/2007, Marty Duey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 11/7/2007 10:49 PM, Shawn Walker wrote:
> >>>
> On 07/11/2007, Moinak Ghosh <[EMAIL
On Nov 10, 2007 1:00 AM, Bryan Boone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I, for one, have tried them (more times than I care to remember).
> For me, neither was stable enough. Solaris was the most stable (tho
> funky disk partitioning) Solaris Express was good (tho a little less
> stable). Belenix failed
On Nov 10, 2007 2:26 PM, Shawn Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think a conversation on determining target system requirements might
> be helpful.
>
> Keep in mind that when determining system requirements for
> installation that several factors can dramatically affect the results:
>
> * Type
On Nov 12, 2007 9:06 AM, Shawn Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 11/11/2007, Aubrey Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Nov 10, 2007 2:26 PM, Shawn Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Indiana should install and run the system with the configuration as foll
On Nov 14, 2007 2:32 AM, LaoTsao(Dr. Tsao) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hi
> may be RTFM question
> how to add openoffice ?
> TIA
> --
Why not staroffice?
-Aubrey
___
indiana-discuss mailing list
indiana-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.o
On Nov 19, 2007 10:15 AM, Ian Murdock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is it me, or is it confusing to have the majority of files in /boot
> except for grub/menu.lst and grub/splash.xpm.gz? Can we move everything
> into /zpl_slim/boot and make /boot a symlink to it? If not, can we
> can we make /boot/g
I saw the 3D desktop(beryl) is supported on beleniX already.
http://www.genunix.org/distributions/belenix_site/?q=home
That's the only reason I put Debian down and pick Ubuntu up, ;-)
And I guess 3D desktop is a major reason what makes ubuntu popular.
Is it possible Indiana support it? Not default
On Nov 23, 2007 9:42 PM, Calum Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2007-11-23 at 21:20 +0800, Aubrey Li wrote:
> > And I guess 3D desktop is a major reason what makes ubuntu popular.
>
> Ubuntu was pretty popular before anybody thought of 3D desktops :) I&#x
Hi list,
I want to try the new update but I'm behind of a firewall in the office.
I have no idea which port pkg is using, but only http and ssh port is
permitted on my side.
so, pkg proxy is the only way to me. Is there a way to configure a
http proxy for pkg?
Thanks,
-Aubrey
On Nov 29, 2007 12:27 AM, Bart Smaalders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Aubrey Li wrote:
> > Hi list,
> >
> > I want to try the new update but I'm behind of a firewall in the office.
> > I have no idea which port pkg is using, but only http and ssh port
Hi list,
I encountered this error when I tried to install SUNWcsl.
Please help.
Thanks,
-Aubrey
==
[EMAIL PROTECTED] pkg install SUNWcsl
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/pkg", line 607, in ?
ret = main_func()
File "/usr/bin/pkg", li
On Dec 20, 2007 1:32 AM, Bart Smaalders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Can you reach 'http://pkg.opensolaris.org:80' from a web browser?
>
> -= Bart
Google told me something.
Actually SUNWcsl has been installed on my system.
But
#pkg-get install gmake
still reported SUNWcsl not found.
That's b
On Dec 21, 2007 4:00 PM, Josh Lange <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I actually ran into this problem a few days ago. I found a pending patch,
> and emailed a list, and cc'ed the patch maintainer:
>
> RESPONSE
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Anyway, to answer your question, the updates to
On Jan 19, 2008 12:16 PM, Ken Mays <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Alexander,
>
> Distro: indsunhelpru0108.iso
>
> Feedback: This Indiana 01/2008 distro release deserves four stars. Everything
> worked much better than the original Indiana preview CD. Very impressive.
>
> Seems this is based on the c
h contains as(1). gas doesn't
> work to build ON, and SUNWsprot's copy of as(1) is non-redistrib. and
> therefore not in indiana
>
That's really bad.
Will this feature be supported in the coming March release?
Thanks,
-Aubrey
>
> On 19-Jan-08, at 5:45 PM, Aubrey Li wrot
On Jan 21, 2008 8:09 AM, Bob Palowoda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > There is nothing that an updated indiana can do with
> > respect to the
> > problem of building ON.
> >
> > The first most visible problem is in the Sun Studio
> > tools,
> > specifically the package SUNWsprot which contains
> > a
On Sat, Mar 1, 2008 at 9:30 AM, Eric Forgeot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> with the latest indiana it boots properly, but it seems the network interface
> is not recognised.
>
When I tried NexentaCP-RC2(based on B79) on VirtualBox, everything
properly except network.
And after NexentaCP-1.0 release
nexenta has small memory requirements - 256MB, which is also zfs-based.
http://www.nexenta.org
-Aubrey
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 4:24 AM, Kyle McDonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Martti Hamunen wrote:
> > How much must have memory to install Indiana.
> > I have 512MB and it stops after 5%.
> >
On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 10:34 PM, Ché Kristo
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I got the same thing but only on my ultra 20 and only on the ultra 20 - my
> dell d620 and optiplex workstation both booted it fine. I'll try grabbing the
> iso again too...
> --
Indiana is x86-based, I think.
Thanks,
-Aub
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 8:12 PM, Alfred Peng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2. The new package system is quite impressive. I can get some needed
> packages from pkg.opensolaris.org. Just a bit confused when I try to
> install some packages which already exist. It just gives me another
> prompt.
On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 8:11 PM, Calum Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So, we've absorbed all the feedback so far, and the main area of
> indecision seems to be the default panel layout. (Well, that and
> whether Evo or Thunderbird should be the default mailer, but TBH
> that's a separate dis
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 7:09 AM, Stephen Hahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>As with Developer Preview 2, we'd like to offer a release candidate
>out so that the teams can get some feedback. Unlike DP1 or DP2, we
>are going to update the packages on pkg.opensolaris.org. This update
>
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 7:07 PM, Sriram Natarajan
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Indiana RC2 is still burning not lot of power when I run on my Tecra
> M2. On battery, Windows XP (my other boot partition) gives me close to 2
> hours of battery. With Indiana RC2, I could hardly cross more than 45
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 11:51 PM, Alan Coopersmith
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Aubrey Li wrote:
>
> > Yeah, power saving will be a long way of opensolaris, not specific on
> > indiana only.
> > Currently, cpu power mangement option is not enabled by default.
>
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 3:27 PM, Aubrey Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 11:51 PM, Alan Coopersmith
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Aubrey Li wrote:
> >
> > > Yeah, power saving will be a long way of opensolaris, not specific o
On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 1:57 AM, Rafael Vanoni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bart Smaalders wrote:
>
> > Aubrey Li wrote:
> >
> > > On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 3:27 PM, Aubrey Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Fri, Apr 25, 2
I found vim doesn't have color after ":syntax on".
but if export TERM=xtermc, the color is back.
Can I file this as a bug or it's just my personal preference?
Thanks,
-Aubrey
___
indiana-discuss mailing list
indiana-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.op
On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 11:46 AM, Shawn Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 10:15 PM, Aubrey Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I found vim doesn't have color after ":syntax on".
> > but if export TERM=xtermc, the color is
On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 3:24 PM, Aubrey Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 11:46 AM, Shawn Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 10:15 PM, Aubrey Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I found vim doesn
I know one or more dtrace related packages are missing,
but just not be able to figure it out. Please help.
It would be great to tell how to find those packages,
not just the package name, ;-)
Thanks,
-Aubrey
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/cpupm-gate/usr/src/uts/i86pc# dmake install
dmake: defaulting to pa
On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 3:47 PM, Shawn Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 2:44 AM, Aubrey Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I know one or more dtrace related packages are missing,
> > but just not be able to figure it out. Please help.
>
2008/4/27 Michal Pryc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Maybe this will help:
>
> http://src.opensolaris.org/source/search?q=TR_SWAPFS_PUTPAGE&defs=&refs=&path=&hist=&project=%2Fonnv
>
> In nevada the file vtrace.h is from package SUNWhea
>
> bash-3.2$ find /var/sadm/pkg -name "pkgmap"|xargs grep -s vtrace.
On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 7:49 AM, Mark Haywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It should be built as part of a kernel build. I'm not sure why it isn't
> being (re)built as part of your build. I think you'll have to investigate
> your build areas and build log.
>
> You might want to consider removing a
On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 11:00 PM, Aubrey Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 7:49 AM, Mark Haywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It should be built as part of a kernel build. I'm not sure why it isn't
> > being (re)built as part
ON_WORKAROUND_6336786 -DOPTERON_WORKAROUND_6323525
> -DOPTERON_
> ERRATUM_172 -D_ASM -D__STDC__=0 -I../../i86pc
> -I/export/build/mh27603/onnv/
> usr/src/common -I../../intel -I../../common -I../../i86pc/genassym/obj64
> -o obj
> 64/dtracestubs.o obj64/dtracestubs.s
&g
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 1:07 AM, Bart Smaalders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Aubrey Li wrote:
>
> Make sure your path is set properly, and that you're using the right build
> tools.
>
> I'll give this a try later on today...
>
> - Bart
>
Hi Bart,
An
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 12:51 PM, Alan Coopersmith
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Aubrey Li wrote:
>
> > So how does this happen? I just build the kernel per build instruction.
> >
>
> If you're building on Indiana instead of SXCE, you've already deviated
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 1:55 PM, Alan Coopersmith
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Aubrey Li wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 12:51 PM, Alan Coopersmith
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Aubrey Li wrote:
> > >
> > >
>
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 12:51 AM, Bart Smaalders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Aubrey Li wrote:
>
> > I know one or more dtrace related packages are missing,
> > but just not be able to figure it out. Please help.
> >
> > It would be great to tell how to f
As I reported several days ago, OpenSolaris RC2a can't build ON.
The issue exists in the official release as well. Now the root cause
was found, and OpenSolaris 200805 can build ON successfully!
As Mark pointed out, libdtracestubs.so isn't being created correctly.
=
On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 8:22 AM, S h i v <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 2:08 PM, Aubrey Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> As I reported several days ago, OpenSolaris RC2a can't build ON.
>> The issue exists in the official release as well. Now
On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 5:59 PM, S h i v <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 11:50 AM, Aubrey Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>> To hasten the build I am using
>>>CW_NO_SHADOW=1
>>> And I have below modification in nightl
On Sun, Jun 1, 2008 at 8:16 PM, Li Qin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I absolutely encountered the same issue in a mercurial managed gate under
> OpenSolaris-2008.05, when I do "make all" under $GATE/usr/src/uts direcotry.
> Except SUNWhea package, I think I have installed all necessary packages.
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 8:22 PM, Seema Alevoor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have installed OpenSolaris 2008.05. I'm trying to get SUNWapch22 package
> using
> 'pfexec pkg install SUNWapch22' but every time it fails midway (it is very
> erratic - sometimes fails after getting 180 files,
>
On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 11:24 PM, Sebastien Roy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-06-06 at 22:46 -0700, Alan Steinberg wrote:
>> Instructions to update OpenSolaris 2008.05 to build 89 or later
>>
>>
>> The command "pkg image-up
Hi folks,
I'm just starting to learn BE.
1) BE can't be activated
# beadm list
BE Active Active on Mountpoint Space
Name reboot Used
-- - -- -
opensolaris yesyes legacy 3.27G
# beadm create test
# beadm list
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 12:41 AM, Ethan Quach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Aubrey Li wrote:
>>
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> I'm just starting to learn BE.
>> 1) BE can't be activated
>> # beadm list
>>
>> BE Active A
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 3:57 PM, Jason Zhao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> We have to activate the new BE before we reboot to it, right?
>>
>
> The opensolaris-1 is already the activated one, the new binaries are in this
> BE.
> And you don't need to activate the opensolaris-1 because it is activ
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 4:59 PM, Tao Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 4:43 PM, Jason Zhao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> We could boot from inactive BE, in GRUB, we can select which BE we want
>> to boot.
>> No matter it is active or not, we can select and boot it.
>>
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 8:34 PM, Dennis Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1 ) get package at
>
> http://releases.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/releases/3.0/contrib/solaris_pkgadd/firefox-3.0.en-US.opensolaris-i386-pkg.bz2
>
> 2 ) bunzip the thing
>
> 3 ) install with
>
> pkgadd -d ./firefox
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 10:04 AM, Hugo Garcia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
>
> What is the key comb for switching between the current active X
> session and the login console?
>
> In SuSe it is Ctl+Alt+FxxKey.
>
maybe you want
#svcadm enable gdm
#svcadm disable gdm
multi console is not supporte
W. Wayne Liauh <> wrote:
> Every time a pkg install failed, a new boot environment would be added. This
> time, I was trying to install SUNWscim packages from an alternative
> authority, but failed twice. My beadm list now shows:
>
> BEActive Active on Mountpoint Space
> Name
Sorry if I missed the solution.
Thanks,
-Aubrey
==
# pkg -R /mnt/ image-update
DOWNLOADPKGS FILES XFER (MB)
SUNWcsl7/549 395/20458
8.88/1170.67pkg
sigh, it's very hard to install entire(tried again and again and
again...), fortunately, download resume is supported, so that I can
download completed.
But, unfortunately, install phase run into an error and I can't run any command.
The machine is logged remotely
Any suggestions?
Thanks,
-A
.so.1: bash: fatal: libnsl.so.1: open failed: No such file or directory
==
I'll reboot the machine by liveCD to see if it's recoverable tmr.
Thanks anyway.
-Aubrey
> Gilles
>
> Aubrey Li wrote:
>
> sigh, it's very hard to install entire(tried again and again an
Gilles Gravier <> wrote:
> How about rebooting with another boot environment. If you've upgraded a few
> times and didn't destroy the previous boot environments, you should be able
> to boot a previous build... say 86 or whatever you had before...
>
rollback to b86, and follow the link
http://open
My network doesn't work after image-update to b95.
After a few attempts I figured it out.
driver_alias is quite different from it on b86.
See below:
In case you encounter the similar issue, I reported this issue here.
Thanks,
-Aubrey
=
$ diff /etc/d
Shawn Walker <> wrote:
>> I still run into a problem:
>> "Krtld: bind_primary(): no relocation information found for module
>> /platform/i86pc/kernel/amd64/
>> unix
>> Krtld: error during inital load/link phase
>>
>> Krtld could not locate nor resolve symbols for:
>> /platform/i36pc/kernel/amd64/un
Shawn Walker <> wrote:
> Aubrey Li wrote:
>>
>>
>> I didn't mean update-grub, I mean *update-archive*.
>
> If you reboot your system properly updating the boot archive is done
> automatically.
>
> As such, such documentation should be unnecessary.
The same ON repo copy, on Nevada, dmake lint works.
But on OpenSolaris200805(B95), "arithmetic syntax error" on every
file. See below
Is this a known issue? Is there any solutions?
Thanks,
-Aubrey
=
sh: echo "\ndebug64/cpudrv_mach.ln"; /opt/SUNWspro/bin/lint -c
-dirout=deb
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 12:04 AM, Dave Miner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Aubrey Li wrote:
>>
>> The same ON repo copy, on Nevada, dmake lint works.
>> But on OpenSolaris200805(B95), "arithmetic syntax error" on every
>> file. See below
>&
David.Comay wrote:
>> The same ON repo copy, on Nevada, dmake lint works.
>> But on OpenSolaris200805(B95), "arithmetic syntax error" on every
>> file. See below
>> Is this a known issue? Is there any solutions?
>
> This is currently filed under
>
>6733971 Lint targets not POSIX shell (=ksh
sigh, I hope someone can replicate this issue as well, so that I can say
I strictly follow this instruction.
http://opensolaris.org/os/project/indiana/resources/rn3/image-update/
$ pfexec pkg image-update
Checking that SUNWipkg (in '/') is up to date...
DOWNLOAD
On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 4:05 AM, Gilles Gravier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Josh,
>
> What syntax did you use to run update_grub? (and I can't seem to find it on
> a livecd)...
>
> Gilles
You need to mount the BE to a mount point, and run
$pfexec /path-to-mount-point/boot/solaris/bin/update_grub
Filed a bug as 3452:
http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=3452&action=View
Please let me know if I can offer more information about this issue.
Thanks,
-Aubrey
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 12:46 AM, Ethan Quach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>> Aubrey,
>>
>>
Thanks for ethan's help. Clearing out /opt fixed my problem.
Does this mean image-update need /opt is empty? Is this intended?
Or did I do something wrong?
Thanks,
-Aubrey
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 11:44 PM, Aubrey Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Filed a bug a
My network works okay under b95 but it doesn't work after update to B97
On B95:
# ifconfig -a
lo0: flags=2001000849 mtu
8232 index 1
inet 127.0.0.1 netmask ff00
e1000g0: flags=201004843
mtu 1500 index 2
inet 10.239.12.36 netmask ff00 broadcast 10.239.12.255
ether 0:
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 8:53 AM, chenlu chen - Sun Microsystems -
Beijing China <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Aubrey,
>
> This is because the device id of 0x10be is changed to 0x10f5 since e1000g
> Ver 5.2.8 (CR6687947.).
> So this is not a bug of e1000g.
>
> Because of some reasons Intel has dec
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 6:34 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The OpenSolaris development package repository
>
>http://pkg.opensolaris.org/
>
> has been updated to reflect the changes in snv_99 including an update
> to GNOME 2.23.91, PHP 5.2.6, Python 2.5, drivers for the Areca SAS/SATA
>
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 3:57 AM, Roman Strobl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> I believe the release will come very soon, but unfortunately not today
> (from what I heard). AFAIK it is not planned to change the name to 2008.12.
>
Will 200811 have a codename?
Thanks,
-Aubrey
Hi list,
This problem remains in the 200811. When /opt folder is not empty,
"pkg image-update" will fail due to image-update cannot be done on live image.
Empty the /opt folder solved the problem.
Similarly, beadm create new-BE will fail too if /opt folder is not empty.
The workaround of image-u
On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 12:43 PM, A. Stecker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> some time ago i got the following answer to a similar (or maybe even the
> same) problem. haven't tried myself yet.
I'm doing exactly what the following suggested, which is sort of unreasonable.
Can we treat /opt the same wa
On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 12:38 AM, Evan Layton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Aubrey Li wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 12:43 PM, A. Stecker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>> some time ago i got the following answer to a similar (or maybe even th
On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 11:01 AM, Shawn Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Aubrey Li wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 12:38 AM, Evan Layton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Aubrey Li wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at
On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 2:01 PM, Shawn Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Aubrey Li wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 11:01 AM, Shawn Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Aubrey Li wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 7:55 PM, Ivan Wang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ugh, sorry, a bit late coming to this thread,
> Is this issue reproducible when one uses pkg image-update exclusively?
> It sounds like the failed mount is because /opt is not empty before zfs
> actually mounts BE /opt dataset,
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 5:35 AM, Dave Miner wrote:
> Sean Liu wrote:
>> Hi there,
>>
>> Since my SATA controller is not supported by OpenSolaris, I downloaded the
>> usb image from genunix and copied to a USB stick, then used the stick to
>> install it to a Western Digital USB disk partition. (I
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 12:15 AM, Dave Miner wrote:
> Aubrey Li wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 5:35 AM, Dave Miner
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Sean Liu wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi there,
>>>>
>>>> Since my SATA contr
Hi list,
After upgrading my system to B106, Cap-Eye-Install doesn't work
properly on my side.
The following command sleep and never return.
"$ Install -G kernel.own -k i86pc -o obj"
In case I encountered a hardware issue, I tried my two machines and
the problem is the
same.
Did anyone see the si
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 3:22 PM, Aubrey Li wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> After upgrading my system to B106, Cap-Eye-Install doesn't work
> properly on my side.
> The following command sleep and never return.
> "$ Install -G kernel.own -k i86pc -o obj"
>
> In case I e
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 5:04 AM, Marco wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> i just upgraded to the actual build in the /dev/ repo.
> On my desktop machine everything worked like a charm.
> But my notebook (lenovo 3000 C200. 1,8GHz celeron, intel chipset) keeps
> rebooting all the time. I disabled the splas
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 1:03 PM, Michael Li wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I tried to upgrade a standard os08.11 installtion to build107 by BFU,
Official upgrade from pkg dev repo.
http://pkg.opensolaris.org/dev/
But it's build106 now.
> but I can't boot up anymore.
next time create a new BE so that you hav
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 9:43 PM, Lurie wrote:
> Another issue I noticed, I wonder if it's just on my config:
>
> $ pfexec powertop
> OpenSolaris PowerTOP version 1.1 (C) 2008 Intel Corporation
>
> powertop: ../cpufreq.c : cpu-change-speed probe unavailable
> Collecting data for 5.00 second(s)
>
1 - 100 of 152 matches
Mail list logo
