XML-based would be very nice. Even it were just an XML-build language
that generated the final package ala the WiX project for MSIs
(http://wix.sourceforge.net/). One of the nice things about using an
XML build language is integration with an automated build process.
It does seem to me that have a
Hi Alberto,
Yes
> Have you used WiX? I did, and I don't even found words in my mother
> tongue to tell you how broken it is in terms of maintanability, 60% of
> that is due to the XML thing.
Yes I do on a daily basis right now (WiX v3)...which is why it was
fresh in my mind. I find it pretty str
Seconded. This goes to Keith Bierman's discussion about large Linux
customers moving to Solaris. Everything has to compile/build/work
seamlessly for those kind of environments to contemplate the move.
Inevitably things go wrong during migrations of that sort...it seems
to me you don't do yourself a
My two cents probably isn't worth much. That being said,
branding/marketing seems like a pretty important discussion to me
given the target of expanding OpenSolaris mindshare. The technical
bones need to be (and by-and-large are) strong. But it needs to look
good and get talked about outside the co
sions. Will there be a SPARC
version of Indiana in its first release?
Best Regards,
Jason
On 10/1/07, Martin Bochnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jason J. W. Williams wrote:
> > My two cents probably isn't worth much. That being said,
> > branding/marketing seems like a pr
me as well. Just waiting on the packaging
system upgrade. :-)
I suppose that's a long way of saying count us as a vote for Indiana
for SPARC...Xorg is not so critical though for us.
Best Regards,
Jason
On 10/1/07, Martin Bochnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jason J. W. Williams wrot
Hi Guys,
It seems to me that its always a good idea to keep /tmp and /var/log
separate, that way filling up your root partition or the /var/log
partition, doesn't affect the OS's ability to allocate and use temp
files. Some strange things start happening when /tmp is full.
Just my opinion.
Best
Hey Guys,
As someone who's come to OpenSolaris from outside the community, I
think the decision is right on. And Ian's comment that he doesn't get
it. It seems to me that community is important, but OpenSolaris has a
larger identity issue vis-a-vis the non-community.
If the goal of the distro is
Hi Jim,
> How about organic growth? Why must we go out and grab developers from
> other communities. Early on we never discussed grabbing developers from
> other communities. Virtually all of our planning discussions were
> focused on organic growth and the business of opening our own stuff.
I r
Hello,
What permissions should a user account have to run any of the IPS GUIs?
Problem is a default user account doesn't have the requisite permissions for
pkg, and root doesn't have access to the display. Thank you in advance for
your help.
Best Regards,
Jason
___
Hello all,
Are there plans to include a Python 2.5 rev in the final Indiana release?
The version OpenSolaris has been shipping has been ancient for a long time.
Doesn't look like anyone as has discussed this since July.
Best Regards,
Jason
___
indiana-d
Hey Y'all,
I apologize for this dumb question...but I can't seem to find any
documentation on it. Sun Studio 12 bombs on on its install because it can't
find patchadd in /usr/sbin. Problem is I'll be dipped if I can figure out
which package supplies patchadd. Any pointers are greatly appreciated.
HI Laca,
It sounds like it's mostly done, but if we can be of any help I'd be happy
to volunteer. Which community/project is responsible for the Python package?
Best Regards,
Jason
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 10:19 PM, Laszlo (Laca) Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Actually, I have that patch in
Hey Bart,
I appreciate the point in the right direction.I'll try and grab it from
another SX system.
Best Regards,
Jason
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 7:51 PM, Bart Smaalders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Jason J. W. Williams wrote:
> > Hey Y'all,
> >
> > I apo
Hi Lurie,
Thank you for the info. Bart was also kind enough to help me out yesterday.
Best Regards,
Jason
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 9:42 AM, Lurie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just do: pfexec ./imagine or ipstool
> --
>
> This message posted from opensolaris.org
>
> __
8 at 12:12 AM, Jason J. W. Williams <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey Bart,
>
> I appreciate the point in the right direction.I'll try and grab it from
> another SX system.
>
> Best Regards,
> Jason
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 7:51 PM, Bart Smaalders <
Hey Y'all,
Don't know if anyone else ran into the same issue I did trying to install
Sun Studio 12 on a clean Indiana DP2 box. There's a few packages missing
from the Indiana DP2 repositories that block Sun Studio from installing.
I've posted a small TAR of the packages here so you don't have to d
Hi All,
Has anyone gotten Indiana LDAP authentication working against an
OpenLDAP server? We have a setup that is currently working with all of
our SXCE boxes, but the required RBAC profile enforcement on Indiana
allows our users to login to an Indiana system but not pfexec to root
permissions or
ROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Jason J. W. Williams wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Has anyone gotten Indiana LDAP authentication working against an
> > OpenLDAP server? We have a setup that is currently working with all of
> > our SXCE boxes, but the required RBAC profi
Oh...you'll also have to add the SolarisUserAttr objectclass to the
user entry before you can add the SolarisAttrKeyValue.
-J
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 1:57 PM, Jason J. W. Williams
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Y'all,
>
> Thank you for all of your pointers. After ba
Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Jason J. W. Williams wrote:
> > Hey Y'all,
> >
> > Don't know if anyone else ran into the same issue I did trying to
> > install Sun Studio 12 on a clean Indiana DP2 box. There's a few
> > packages missin
Hi Richard,
The only issue is that the SUNWswmt is missing from
pkg.opensolaris.org for DP2. Without it, patchadd isn't there and the
install of Sun Studio fails.
Best Regards,
Jason
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 3:23 PM, Richard Elling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Michal Bielicki wrote:
> > Hmm I ju
Would it be possible for an upgrade not to rename to the new
nomenclature, but a clean install would? With more and more
configuration being moved into dladm, it also seems its getting easier
to create an auto-migration facility for the nomenclature?
Also, having generic names would make it much e
It seems to me Linux folks would prefer ethX naming, and Solaris folks
don't have a problem with the current naming (although trying to
remember that nge and nxge are not even remotely related is kind of
archaic). In that respect, it would almost seem worthwhile to have an
option on a clean Indiana
It grows on you...just isn't very inspiring.
-J
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 1:17 AM, Jim Grisanzio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Arthur Rudnik wrote:
> multi-color bubbles
> > So it looks like we'll have to provide massive feedback to get a logo
> that's actually looking good ...
> >
>
> I'v
It seems like its been awhile since there was a status update on the
progress of OpenSolaris for SPARC. Is the project still alive? Would
like to load it on a T5240. Thank you in advance.
-J
___
indiana-discuss mailing list
indiana-discuss@opensolaris.or
Aye. :-)
>
> You need to read the build 106 announcement that David Comay sent today
> more closely. 8-)
>
___
indiana-discuss mailing list
indiana-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss
27 matches
Mail list logo
