Re: [efloraofindia:431121] Re: Surajit-24Aug22- Euphorbia hyssopifolia L. ?

Thank you Jaydip ji . Have a nice day With regards,Euphorbia hyssopifolia L. Surajit Koley On Wednesday, 24 August 2022 at 13:40:13 UTC+5:30 gadhiyaj...@gmail.com wrote: > Yes sir it is Euphorbia hypericifolia  > > Thanks & Regards > Jaydip Gadhiya  > > On Wed, 24 Aug, 2022, 13:12 surajit

Re: [efloraofindia:400620] Fwd: Araceae for ID (Alocasia sp. ?)

surajitno...@gmail.com wrote: > OK Sir ji. > It's interesting to note that there is a *Colocasia* that has somewhat > shiny adaxial leaf surface. > > > Thank you. > Best regards, > Surajit Koley > > > On Wed, 28 Apr 2021 at 21:07, J.M. Garg wrote: > >

Re: [efloraofindia:392072] MS,July, 2021/06 Camonea/Merremia sp. (umbellata ?) for id.

I think, you have a wrong notion of *Operculina turpethum* (L.) Silva Manso, Mr. Garg. Regards, Surajit Koley On Tuesday, 13 July 2021 at 21:36:50 UTC+5:30 JM Garg wrote: > Thanks, Pardesi ji. > As per description of *Merremia umbellata* as per Convolvulaceae Unlimited >

Re: [efloraofindia:391139] MS,June,2021/13 Climber for id

Yes, more proably it is *Merremia umbellata* subsp. *macra* (C.B.Clarke) Parmar = *Camonea kingii* (Prain) A.R.Simões & Staples, than *Operculina turpethum*. On Tuesday, 6 July 2021 at 17:02:27 UTC+5:30 JM Garg wrote: > Thanks, Sawmliana ji. > It appears more closer to images at *Operculina

[efloraofindia:390959] Re: IDENTITY -43

Might be *Artemisia dracunculus* L. - - http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=5_id=200023201 - http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=2_id=200023201 -

Re: [efloraofindia:390960] Fwd: Asteraceae Fortnight Part 2-Discoid Heads: Artemisia for id from Panipat- NS 58

Leaves and leaf like bracts seem to be pectinasect here can we think of *Artemisia caruifolia* Buch.-Ham. ex Roxb. ( *Artemisia carvifolia* Buch.-Ham. ex Roxb. as per "Plants of Indian Himalayan Region, BSI, 2019). The species is distributed in Uttarakhand. while *A. scoparia* in HP. On

[efloraofindia:390948] Re: Please Identify Flaveria sp.

This is most likely *Thespis divaricata* DC. 1. http://www.efloras.org/object_page.aspx?object_id=121038_id=2 2. http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=2_id=200024593 3. http://www.plantsoftheworldonline.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:255621-1 4.

[efloraofindia:390777] Re: Plant ID from BD

Check *Mitragyna parvifolia* (Roxb.) Korth. or If it is scandent, check *Uncaria*. On Friday, 2 July 2021 at 15:41:21 UTC+5:30 nature...@gmail.com wrote: > Another picture > > --- > Md Sharif Hossain Sourav > MSc Student | Biodiversity and Collection

Re: [efloraofindia:390717] Sh. Paradesi Anjaneyulu- 2nd runner up Star Expert of June’21

Yesterday, I missed this thread, Paradesi ji. There are so many catagories in the forum and I do not receive each update unless I subscribe any particular thread. *However, to me, quality is of prime importance than the quantity. *These days anybody can compare images with FoI or eFI or some

[efloraofindia:390588] Re: 2nd Runner up Most Interactive Person of June’21- Sh. Shakir Ahmed Mochi

Congratulations Shakir ji, hope very soon you take the place 1st. On Thursday, 1 July 2021 at 12:34:18 UTC+5:30 JM Garg wrote: > Dear members, > Shakir ji is the 2nd Runner up Most Interactive Person of the last month. > He has made postings from his area in J & K through his 123 messages >

[efloraofindia:390587] Re: Sh. Surajit Koley- 1st runner up Star Expert of June’21

Thank you Sir. On Thursday, 1 July 2021 at 12:22:32 UTC+5:30 JM Garg wrote: > Dear members, > Surajit ji is the 1st Runner up Star Expert of the last month through his 168 > messages , > mainly helping in the identifications. > He is

[efloraofindia:390585] Re: Top posters of June 2021

Thank you Sir for all your hard work, each month. On Thursday, 1 July 2021 at 09:09:27 UTC+5:30 JM Garg wrote: > Thanks a lot, Singh ji, for the hard work to compile these details. > > -- > With regards, > J. M. Garg > > On Thu, 1 Jul, 2021, 8:47 am Gurcharan Singh, wrote: > >> Dear friends >>

[efloraofindia:390584] Re: Top posters of June 2021

Thank you Sir for providing the sum up each month's activity. On Thursday, 1 July 2021 at 09:09:27 UTC+5:30 JM Garg wrote: > Thanks a lot, Singh ji, for the hard work to compile these details. > > -- > With regards, > J. M. Garg > > On Thu, 1 Jul, 2021, 8:47 am Gurcharan Singh, wrote: > >> Dear

Re: [efloraofindia:390582] Re: Most Interactive Person of May’2021: Dr. Gurcharan Singh

Always No. 1 And last night I found out *Crepis dachhigamensis* G.Singh. I miss your tutorials, Sir. On Thursday, 1 July 2021 at 12:15:15 UTC+5:30 seemabinzee786 wrote: > Congratulations Gurcharan sir g > Keep shine > > On Thu, Jul 1, 2021, 12:10 PM J.M. Garg wrote: > >> In the subject it

[efloraofindia:390580] Re: Sh. Saroj Kumar- Star Expert of June’2021

Wow! Great! On Thursday, 1 July 2021 at 12:06:57 UTC+5:30 JM Garg wrote: > Dear members, > Sh. Saroj Kumar Kasaju is the Star Expert of last month (with 463 messages > ) with his > beautiful uploads & interactions. > He is now not only

[efloraofindia:390568] Re: [efloraindia:96333] Plant for ID from Paddar valley J: 251111 SRANA 02

I beg to differ, here number of florets are more than 30 against *Youngia japonica* (L.) DC. It might be *Crepis multicaulis* Ledeb., the first picture shows hint of white hairs on stem, peduncles. Please check with the original plate if hair and glands also present on involucre. Thank you

[efloraofindia:390539] Re: SK372 12FEB-2017:ID

KEW says this one is present in Nepal, can't say altitude, - http://www.plantsoftheworldonline.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:200327-1 Note the name "foetida" has been struck out - http://apps.kew.org/herbcat/getImage.do?imageBarcode=K000808321 Please check if this can be your species.

Re: [efloraofindia:390392] Ixeridium sagittarioides (C.B.Clarke) Pak & Kawano

If the leaves, at the extreme top-left of the 1st picture (DSC_0712), are of the same species, it is probably *Launaea procumbens*. The species has been reported at 4000 ft in Nepal - Kanchapur area, Darkhani village etc., meaning as high as 4000ft. Please check the phyllaries here -

Re: [efloraofindia:390308] My Pending Identifications: Chakrata- Unid Asteraceae:: NS MARCH 17

Please also check probability of *Ixeridium sagittarioides* (C. B. Clarke) Pak & Kawano. Please note that flowering time doesn't tally with literatures. - http://apps.kew.org/herbcat/getImage.do?imageBarcode=K001118954 - https://www.gbif.org/occurrence/2610909391 On Monday, 28 June

Re: [efloraofindia:390010] Re: SK546 06 JUN-2017:ID

:37 UTC+5:30 surajitno...@gmail.com wrote: > *Sir ji, please go ahead with the id L. setuligera.* > > *If I am wrong the world, meaning persons accessing this site, would think > I am a foolish person.* > But, if I am right .!!! > > Thank you > With regards > surajit koley

[efloraofindia:389999] Re: [indiantreepix:18824] Re: ... Wedelia-like aster

Ref. = https://groups.google.com/g/indiantreepix/c/zPoQ5PT-YRA/m/MaScdcrYAgAJ On Saturday, 26 June 2021 at 15:49:14 UTC+5:30 surajitno...@gmail.com wrote: > Question remains whether *Wedelia urticaefolia* (Blume) DC. ex Wight > (Syn: *Verbesina urticifolia* Blume) is really reported from

[efloraofindia:389736] Re: Asteraceae Fortnight Part I-Radiate heads: Ornamentals- Calendula? for id from Panchkula- NS 14

Is this the same as in another thread - https://groups.google.com/g/indiantreepix/c/0WSPy28_VBw/m/PFJbeRr-3P8J? I agree, it might be *Arctotis*, like those in http://pza.sanbi.org/arctotis-hirsuta and this kind of involucre can be seen at

Re: [efloraofindia:389712] Launaea from Mata Vaishno Devi Marg Katra

Does *Launaea secunda* have leaves with white cartilaginous teeth, like *L. procumbens*? On Wednesday, 23 June 2021 at 16:47:53 UTC+5:30 Saroj Kumar Kasaju wrote: > Yes Mr. Garg ! Launaea secunda >

[efloraofindia:389405] Re: Herb Id from Bangladesh_SM_1502

*Ethulia conyzoides* subsp. *conyzoides* = http://www.plantsoftheworldonline.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:77179903-1 Regards surajit koley On Sunday, 20 June 2021 at 17:44:16 UTC+5:30 Gurcharan Singh wrote: > Forwarding for ID > Distributed as Vernonieae member- Taherpur, Sunamgang,

[efloraofindia:389315] Re: Plant of Indonesia 4: Asteraceae of Mt Slamet

Difference between *S. asper* and *S. oleraceus* can be viewed at FoC - http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=2_id=130683#KEY-1-2 Illustrations of both the species can be viewed at FoC - 1. *oleraceus* - http://www.efloras.org/object_page.aspx?object_id=121014_id=2 2.

Re: [efloraofindia:389306] Re: Asteraceae Fortnight Part 3-Ligulate Heads: Launaea? from VOF for id -NS 14

This is no *Launaea acaulis*, neither any usual *Launaea* spp. Here the phyllaries are 2-seriate, each set having phyllary of equal size, I am yet to find that character in *Launaea*. Unfortunately, there is no herbarium of *L. microcephala*, neither any description except in Flora of British

[efloraofindia:389176] Re: Asteraceae member for ID from Uttarakhand: DSR_Nov. 2016_2/2

So many pending *Launaea*, it is getting complicated, I think this might be *L. procumbens*, please compare with GIFR herb.- https://www.gbif.org/occurrence/437854769 ad others - https://www.gbif.org/occurrence/gallery?taxon_key=3144806 On Wednesday, 16 June 2021 at 08:43:50 UTC+5:30 Gurcharan

[efloraofindia:389168] Re: ASTERACEAE Fortnight Part 3-Ligulate Heads: Launaea acaulis for validation from Uttarakhand_DSR_14

Sorry, missed the main point, it has more than 14 florets, it may not be *L. acaulis* (as per FoC, the species has 10-14 florets). I don't know yet what it can be. On Friday, 18 June 2021 at 20:43:08 UTC+5:30 surajitno...@gmail.com wrote: > Outer phyllaries are unequal (of various size)

[efloraofindia:389151] Re: ASTERACEAE Fortnight Part 3-Ligulate Heads: Launaea acaulis for validation from Uttarakhand_DSR_14

Outer phyllaries are unequal (of various size), I agree wit the id. On Thursday, 17 June 2021 at 12:23:27 UTC+5:30 Gurcharan Singh wrote: > Forwarding for ID > Distributed as Launaea species- Pantnagar, Uttarakhand >

[efloraofindia:389144] Re: SK1187 09 JUNE 2018

If it is Asteraceae, it might be *Notoseris khasiana* (C.B.Clarke) N.Kilian. On Monday, 14 June 2021 at 20:43:41 UTC+5:30 Gurcharan Singh wrote: > Forwarding for ID > Distributed as Lactuca species ?- Sukhiapokahari, West Bengal >

[efloraofindia:389006] Re: 200320 SD 03

SInce Nidhan Sir is familiar with the suggested id, and KEW says its distriution is " to Indian subcontinent", I think accepting the same would be safe bet. On Monday, 14 June 2021 at 17:08:53 UTC+5:30 Gurcharan Singh wrote: > Forwarding again for ID > Distributed as Lactuca species ?-

Re: [efloraofindia:389005] MS Oct, 2019/12 Cichorium sp.? for id

I intend to agree with Saroj ji, the phyllaries, outer and inner both, differ with those in another thread - https://groups.google.com/g/indiantreepix/c/rNf_ilvtAwQ/m/IDKiefe7yeEJ, I think. On Wednesday, 23 December 2020 at 07:36:55 UTC+5:30 JM Garg wrote: > > > -- > With regards, > J. M.

[efloraofindia:388283] Re: Sh. Paradesi Anjaneyulu- 'The Pillar' of efloraofindia

I am very happy, Paradesi ji. With regards, surajit On Tuesday, 8 June 2021 at 15:45:22 UTC+5:30 JM Garg wrote: > Dear members, > It gives us pleasure to announce the addition of Sh. Paradesi Anjaneyulu > as 'The Pillar' of efloraofindia. > He must have completed more than 2,500 messages as

Re: [efloraofindia:388179] plant for ID

Please make sure *Agave americana* can grow wild in our country, because as per Botany of Bihar and Orissa*, only *Agave vera-cruz was more or less naturalized (in Singbhum). And I agree with Ushadi, *americana* is a roust plant. On Wednesday, 2 October 2019 at 08:46:36 UTC+5:30 JM Garg wrote:

Re: [efloraofindia:388178] Wild Plants for ID : Nasik : 02JUL19 : AK-6

I maybe wrong but it looks too tender a plant to be *Agave americana*. Can you please upload high resolution picture of its leaves? On Monday, 15 July 2019 at 09:24:30 UTC+5:30 JM Garg wrote: > No. Both are different. > Pl. see > *Agave sisalana * Perrine >

Re: [efloraofindia:388176] Requesting ID of this plant - Sagar Upvan - December 2013 :: 08012014 :: ARK-11

Sorry,* it is Agave americana*, the 3rd picture shows sinuate margin, typical of *americana*; which I missed. On Monday, 7 June 2021 at 22:01:49 UTC+5:30 surajitno...@gmail.com wrote: > I think - it is *Agave vera-cruz*, because :- > >1. marginal prickles conspicuous, straight and

Re: [efloraofindia:388166] Requesting ID of this plant - Sagar Upvan - December 2013 :: 08012014 :: ARK-11

I think - it is *Agave vera-cruz*, because :- 1. marginal prickles conspicuous, straight and with dark coloured tips. 2. in *americana* (1) leaves are constricted aove the base ( neck region) (2) prickles are strong 3. in *cantula* prickles are falcate On Thursday, 30 January 2014

[efloraofindia:388159] Re: ID required

Sir, As per "botany of Bihar and Orissa", *Agave sisalana* has very short ascending caudex. It is possibly *Furcraea* sp., the common species is *F. gigantea* Vent. I attach herewith screenshot from Haines's book. On Wednesday, 5 May 2021 at 16:36:32 UTC+5:30 Gurcharan Singh wrote: >

Re: [efloraofindia:388152] Fwd: Agave For ID : 240414 : AK-19

As per Haines, *A. angustifolia* should have prickles like - https://cdn.plantatlas.org/img/specimens/USF/268928.jpg So, I think it is *A. sisalana*, ("lucidcentral" has similar specimen ,

Re: [efloraofindia:388146] Fwd: 20-TSP-ID-05JAN2016-1: Agave-like plant for ID

I agree with you, SIr ji, it is very much like my species - https://groups.google.com/g/indiantreepix/c/ToNdlHN86Ag/m/mqnn9MzXXAsJ. And thanks to Kumar ji, pic 6 clearly shows 3-lobed stigma, as described in FoP. On Monday, 10 May

Re: [efloraofindia:388109] Plant for ID : Bangalore : 04OCT20 : AK-11

Good morning Madam ji There is one similar looking - https://thepalmroom.files.wordpress.com/2012/05/p1060029.jpg at https://thepalmroom.wordpress.com/plant-care-discussion-forum/kalanchoe-thrysiflora-kalanchoe-luciae/ Thank you .. have a great exploring day Regards surajit On Saturday,

Re: [efloraofindia:387868] uttarakhand uid 1 21012012

May I ask what are the differences in the capitula here and those in FoI specimen - https://www.flowersofindia.net/catalog/slides/White-Flowered%20Fleabane.html ? It appears to me (I may be wrong) there is same capitulum in

Re: [efloraofindia:387858] Fwd: Plants from Northeast Tour 2017- Emilia for specific id, Cherrapunji

*Emilia prenanthoidea* DC. and *Emilia zeylanica* C.B.Clarke are difficult to differentiate. *In this particular case presence of hairs on leaves

[efloraofindia:387827] Re: Blumea sp (??) from Kamrup district (Metro), Assam

Please check *Blumea balsamifera* (L.) DC - http://www.plantsoftheworldonline.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:185502-1 On Friday, 4 June 2021 at 18:49:28 UTC+5:30 Gurcharan Singh wrote: > Forwarding for ID > Distributed as Emilia sonchifolia ? >

[efloraofindia:387826] Re: ID of Emilia sp. from Meghalaya KD 04 Nov

Probably *E. sonchifolia* (L.) DC - http://www.plantsoftheworldonline.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:203080-1 On Friday, 4 June 2021 at 18:52:35 UTC+5:30 Gurcharan Singh wrote: > Forwarding for ID > Distributed as Emilia species- Meghalaya >

Re: [efloraofindia:387611] Convolvulus species for identification...

I think it is typical *Aniseia martinicensis* (Jacq.) Choisy, (whether reported from Nicobar or not ) - http://www.plantsoftheworldonline.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:30070865-2 On Wednesday, 2 June 2021 at 15:07:05 UTC+5:30 JM Garg wrote: > Hi, Apurba ji, > What are the species reported

Re: [efloraofindia:387595] Clerodendrum species for identification...

Please, check if it can be *Clerodendrum villosum* Blume - http://powo.science.kew.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:862479-1 On Wednesday, 2 June 2021 at 17:06:40 UTC+5:30 JM Garg wrote: > Hi, Apurba ji, > What are the species reported from your area? > > On Wed, 2 Jun 2021 at 17:05, J.M.

[efloraofindia:387537] Re: ID Requested - Monocot Species 2

The 2nd pic features *Phalaris* sp., cf. *P. miima*. 1st pic probably initial stage of the same. On Wednesday, 2 June 2021 at 12:00:37 UTC+5:30 JM Garg wrote: > Forwarding again for Id assistance please. > > -- Forwarded message - > From: Harsh Yadav > Date: Tue, 25 May 2021 at

[efloraofindia:387479] Re: 2nd Runner up Most Interactive Person of May’21- Sh. Shakir Ahmed Mochi

Hats off to you, Shakir ji, I am thinking of borrowing your "Ammatuer Taxonomist"! On Tuesday, 1 June 2021 at 12:12:01 UTC+5:30 JM Garg wrote: > Dear members, > Shakir ji is the 2nd Runner up Most Interactive Person of the last month. > He has made postings from his area in J & K through his

Re: [efloraofindia:387419] Re: Limnophila diffusa Benth.? Hooghly 13-01-13 sk2

gt; <https://www.google.com.au/url?sa=t=j==s=web==2ahUKEwji6f2I4bPtAhV4wzgGHdTzAiAQFjALegQIARAC=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.iaat.org.in%2Fimages%2Fjournalprev%2F1995%2F1%2F60-62.pdf=AOvVaw1wIxYQjROn4b9RE8NYbuQP> >> ?? >> Thank you >> Saroj Kasaju >> >> On Tuesday, Janu

[efloraofindia:387413] Re: Sh. Saroj Kumar- Star Expert of May’2021

Congratulations, Sir ji On Tuesday, 1 June 2021 at 11:44:15 UTC+5:30 JM Garg wrote: > Dear members, > Sh. Saroj Kumar Kasaju is the Star Expert of last month (with 482 messages > ) with his > beautiful uploads & interactions. > He is now

[efloraofindia:387411] Re: Most Interactive Person of May’2021: Sh. Gurcharan Singh

I am too little to congratulate you, Sir ji, but I am very happy. On Tuesday, 1 June 2021 at 11:58:31 UTC+5:30 Gurcharan Singh wrote: > Thanks Garg ji > > > > > Dr. Gurcharan Singh > Retired Associate Professor > SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007 > Res: 932 Anand Kunj,

[efloraofindia:387410] Re: Sh. Paradesi Anjaneyulu- 1st runner up Star Expert of May’21

Congratulations, Sir ji On Tuesday, 1 June 2021 at 11:47:30 UTC+5:30 JM Garg wrote: > Dear members, > We have, Sh. Paradesi Anjaneyulu, as 1st Runner up Expert of last month, > with 199 messages > . > Sh. Paradesi Anjaneyulu completed

[efloraofindia:387408] Re: 1st Runner up Most Interactive Person of May’21- Sh. Mahadeswara Swamy

Congratulations, Sir ji On Tuesday, 1 June 2021 at 11:58:36 UTC+5:30 JM Garg wrote: > Dear members, > Mahadeswara ji is the 1st Runner up Most Interactive Person of the last > month. > He has helped a lot in identification along with providing critical inputs > through his 145 messages >

[efloraofindia:387407] Re: Sh. Surajit Koley- 2nd runner up Star Expert of May’21

Thank you very much, Sir ji. On Tuesday, 1 June 2021 at 11:53:07 UTC+5:30 JM Garg wrote: > Dear members, > Surajit ji is the 2nd Runner up Star Expert of the last month through his 153 > messages , > mainly helping in the

[efloraofindia:387397] Re: Ipomoea SN11521

Do you have any more photographs? This is no *Operculina turpethum*. Check *Aniseia martinicensis* (Jacq.) Choisy - http://www.plantsoftheworldonline.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:30070865-2 On Tuesday, 11 May 2021 at 04:35:26 UTC+5:30 Santhan P wrote: > Wild climber near Chandrapur

Re: [efloraofindia:387392] Top Posters of May 2021

Yes, Sir, I too have seen several uploads, all new to me. On Tuesday, 1 June 2021 at 10:19:23 UTC+5:30 Gurcharan Singh wrote: > I wish to make special mention of Shakir Ahmed Saadick (more than 100 > posts), Seema Bin Zeenat (plus 70 posts) and Harikrishnan VR ( 80 posts) > with their

[efloraofindia:387392] Re: Top Posters of May 2021

Thank you very much, Sir ji. On Tuesday, 1 June 2021 at 06:57:51 UTC+5:30 Gurcharan Singh wrote: > > > Top Posters of May 2021 > > > > 1. > > J M Garg > > 765 > > 2. > > Gurcharan Singh > > 610 > > 3. > > Saroj Kasaju > > 482 > > 4. > > Paradesi Anjaneyyulu > > 199 > > 5. > > Surajit > > 153

[efloraofindia:387391] Re: Cryptanthus bivittatus for validation (Cultivated::Delhi)-NS June 2021

Wow! breathtaking photographs, Sir ji. On Tuesday, 1 June 2021 at 08:28:13 UTC+5:30 Nidhan Singh wrote: > Dear All, > > I wish to get the identification validated...there are only very > few flowering pics on the internet for this species.. > I request you to please validate or correct the

[efloraofindia:387238] Re: Asteracea Id from Bangladesh_SM_1302

If it is reported in Bangladesh, it may be *W. urticaeolia* DC = *W. wallichii *Less of Bengal Plants & FBI = http://www.plantsoftheworldonline.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:77180365-1 But If it is shrubby climber from coastal area, it is most likely *W. scandens *Clarke of BP = *W.

[efloraofindia:386852] Re: ID Requested- Monocot Species

check *Dactyloctenium aegyptium* - https://efloraofindia.com/2011/02/23/dactyloctenium-aegyptiam/ On Tuesday, 25 May 2021 at 12:55:10 UTC+5:30 harshy...@gmail.com wrote: > Location - Nalanda, Bihar > Germination period- March > Monocot Species > -- You received this message because you are

[efloraofindia:386851] Re: ID Requested - Monocot Species

Check *Phalaris* sp., c.f. -*Phalaris minor* - https://efloraofindia.com/2011/03/20/phalaris-minor/ On Tuesday, 25 May 2021 at 12:56:07 UTC+5:30 harshy...@gmail.com wrote: > Location - Nalanda, Bihar > Germination period- March > Monocot Species > -- You received this message because you are

[efloraofindia:386849] Re: ID Requested - Monocot Species

Check *Axonopus compressus* - https://efloraofindia.com/2011/02/08/axonopus-compressus/ On Tuesday, 25 May 2021 at 12:57:25 UTC+5:30 harshy...@gmail.com wrote: > Location - Nalanda, Bihar > Germination period- March > Monocot Species > -- You received this message because you are subscribed

[efloraofindia:384968] Re: MS July, 2018/07 Sambucus or Leea sp. for ID

Can you please upload original picture of leaves? Please also upload "stipule" picture, if you have any. How tall is this one? I assume it is not the same one as in your other upload - https://groups.google.com/g/indiantreepix/c/IpQ44lGA2CY/m/9BPJI5zPAAAJ Thank you Reagrds Surajit Koley On

[efloraofindia:384966] Re: MS Aug.,2018/12 Leea aequata for Id/confirmation

Can you please upload original of the 1st pic (Leea sp. (1). jpg)? Can you please state the height of this plant? Is this the same species as in another upload by you - https://groups.google.com/g/indiantreepix/c/7_q1k0CIELM/m/hSnCq2GIDgAJ? Thank you Regards Surajit Koley On Monday, 6 August

Re: [efloraofindia:384650] ID plz_RKC09_180811

Please, check probability of *Gymnema inodorum* - http://plantillustrations.org/species.php?id_taxon=1282=Gymnema_species=485496==0=0=7qan5fmjao0m3je9sd6m8urkg6_out=0=0=0_type=genus_selectable=0_broad_or_restricted=broad There is a negative point, though - as per Flora of China - corolla yellow.

[efloraofindia:384198] Re: Meliaceae member like Dysoxylum

Sir, Here capsules seem to have 5 cells (valves). I couldn't make out Leaflet numbers and character. Please check probability of *Sphaerosacme decandra* (Hiern) T.D.Penn. (syn. *Amoora decandra* Hiren) - https://www.gbif.org/occurrence/gallery?taxon_key=3850570 and

Re: [efloraofindia:384176] Re: Arecaceae Fortnight 1 Aug to 15 Aug 2014 : Veitchia arecina Becc.? : SK-25

gt;> <https://sites.google.com/site/efloraofindia/species/a---l/ar/arecaceae/dypsis/dypsis-lutescens-1> >>> Group discussion at >>> Arecaceae Fortnight 1 Aug to 15 Aug 2014 : Veitchia arecina Becc.? : >>> SK-25 (google.com) >>> <https://groups.goo

Re: [efloraofindia:383768] TQ-Manipur11 Unid herb from Manipur

This is most likely *Tournefortia* of Boraginaceae, *as Paradesi ji indicated.* The species id is complicated - the three most suitable candidates are - 1) *T. candollii * 2) *T. viridiflora* and 3) *T. roxburghii* of Flora of British India. I think it is the first one, because 1) longer

Re: [efloraofindia:383507] Re: Covid

Sorry to know that Sir. Wishing speedy recovery of all your family members, Sir. Hope, these dark days would soon be over for everybody. Regards, Surajit Koley On Friday, 23 April 2021 at 09:57:39 UTC+5:30 Saroj Kumar Kasaju wrote: > Thank you Nidhan sir! > Saroj Kasaju > > On Fri, 23 Apr 2021

[efloraofindia:383089] Re: Ascalpidiace or Apocynace id from Bangladesh _sm_3002

Agreed, Ji But, species level identification is difficult. because of data conflict !!! for example - 1. http://www.plantsoftheworldonline.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:96650-1 2. http://flora-peninsula-indica.ces.iisc.ac.in/herbsheet.php?id=1254=7 3.

[efloraofindia:382910] Re: Climber ID from Bangladesh_ SM1007

This is *Sarcolobus carinatus* Wall., as had previously been identified. Regards, Surajit Koley On Friday, 16 April 2021 at 20:03:41 UTC+5:30 Gurcharan Singh wrote: > Forwarding for ID > Distributed as Sarcolobus species ?- Bangladesh >

[efloraofindia:382900] Re: TQ-Manipur10 - Unidentified tree from Manipur

Tabish ji, please check the following 3 URLs for any probability - 1. http://plantillustrations.org/illustration.php?id_illustration=228091_taxon=841=0=2cl3ef6lapfi6tc0jma8u7m3ka=English_selectable=0_thumbnail=0_type=species_broad_or_restricted=broad=0_out=0=0 2.

Re: [efloraofindia:381300] Hooghly : 02-April-2021 : Euphorbia viguieri ?

Thank you Sir, for confirming the id. Best regards, Surajit Koley On Friday, 2 April 2021 at 21:30:19 UTC+5:30 Saroj Kumar Kasaju wrote: > I guess ID is correct ! > Thank you. > > Saroj Kasaju > > > On Fri, Apr 2, 2021 at 9:29 PM surajit koley > wrote: > >> I took these photographs on

[efloraofindia:381041] Re: 2nd Runner up Most Interactive Person of March'21- Sh. Surajit Koley

Thank you so much Kumar ji. With regards Surajit Koley On Thursday, 1 April 2021 at 20:40:24 UTC+5:30 tsp kumar wrote: > Congratulations Surajit ji > regards > tspkumar > > > On Thursday, April 1, 2021 at 7:56:18 PM UTC+5:30 surajitno...@gmail.com > wrote: > >>

[efloraofindia:379974] Re: Shrub/Tree Id from Bangladesh_SM_1406

Try *Syzygium polypetalum* (Wall.) Merr. & L.M.Perry - http://powo.science.kew.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:602103-1 -

Re: [efloraofindia:378984] Hooghly : 15-03-2021 : Thunbergia

Thank you again, Sir. Regards Surajit Koley On Monday, 15 March 2021 at 22:29:10 UTC+5:30 Saroj Kumar Kasaju wrote: > Yes. > Thank you > Saroj Kasaju > > On Mon, 15 Mar 2021 at 10:06 pm, surajit koley > wrote: > >> This garden species looks similar to - >>

Re: [efloraofindia:378983] Hooghly : 15-03-2021 : Plectranthus ?

Thank you Sir. Regards Surajit Koley On Monday, 15 March 2021 at 22:30:25 UTC+5:30 Saroj Kumar Kasaju wrote: > Yes. > Thank you > Saroj Kasaju > > On Mon, 15 Mar 2021 at 10:01 pm, surajit koley > wrote: > >> This garden species resembles - >>