New case insensitive behaviour in CVS 1.11.6 and 1.12.1

2003-05-31 Thread Robert Clark
Hi, I have been playing around with the new version and noticed a bit of a behaviour change that is causing me some grief and am wondering if this is a real bug or an intended behaviour change. To make a long story short (long version follows), Windows clients can no longer distinguish between an

Re: FW: cvs import & checkout -D date_spec

2003-05-31 Thread Larry Jones
Chen, Susie writes: > > [1st import] > cvs import -ko -kb -I! There's no point in specifying -k more than once, only the last one is effective. > cvs rtag rtag without -r is almost always a mistake -- you have no idea what revisions you're actually tagging. And without -

RE: FW: cvs import & checkout -D date_spec

2003-05-31 Thread Chen, Susie
Actually I posted the question for a colleague. Here is the sequence of commands he used: [1st import] cvs import -ko -kb -I! cvs rtag cvs checkout -D -r The rtag command makes the import available only to the branch. The check outs are fine at this point.

Tags and module file

2003-05-31 Thread Gurpreet Singh (SCM)
Hi All This is a query regd - branches (special tag) or tags and module file. Is it somehow possible to include one tag in one module defination and another tag in another module defination ? ^^Regards Gurpreet S ___ Info-cvs mailing list [EMAI

Re: The idea isn't clear...

2003-05-31 Thread Eric Siegerman
On Wed, May 28, 2003 at 07:29:58PM -0400, Greg A. Woods wrote: > [ On Wednesday, May 28, 2003 at 15:24:09 (-0700), Jim wrote: ] > > >>> > > stuff > > === > > other stuff > > <<< > > It's one hell of a lot easier to tell what's going on with conflicts if > you fix CVS to call "diff3" i