hi all,
I got a Cyrus-imap-2.2 from CVS yeserday and I compiled it successfully.But
I can't use cyradm to create mailbox.
System gave me a error message as follows
Can't load
'/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.1/i386-linux/auto/Cyrus/IMAP/IMAP.so' f
or module Cyrus
Hi Ken,
On Fri, 10 Jan 2003 12:43:12 -0500, Ken Murchison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote...
> Did you try sieve/test on your script and a message?
I've finally had a chance to try sieve/test on the script and a message as you
suggested. The test program after asking questions decided to send a vacati
Hi!
I am aware this question has been asked several times before, so please
go easy on me.
I'm wishing to move people off BSD popper over to a Cyrus system I've
set up. Unfortunately, being school holidays, they've gone and got their
current mailboxes jammed with stuff that is (no doubt) so dam
Hi,
Does anyone knows how to backup cyrus emails?
_
Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*.
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 14:16 -0800 Jonathan Marsden wrote:
How about checking for viruses before mail reaches Cyrus? Such as
with a virus scanner that runs as a milter which sendmail talks to
when it receives mail? Or a similar approach for whatever your chosen
MTA is?
Because (as men
On 21 Jan 2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> At 14:16 -0800 Jonathan Marsden wrote:
>> How about checking for viruses before mail reaches Cyrus? Such as
>> with a virus scanner that runs as a milter which sendmail talks to
>> when it receives mail? Or a similar approach for whatever your
>> cho
At 14:16 -0800 Jonathan Marsden wrote:
>How about checking for viruses before mail reaches Cyrus? Such as
>with a virus scanner that runs as a milter which sendmail talks to
>when it receives mail? Or a similar approach for whatever your chosen
>MTA is?
Because (as mentioned elsewhere in this t
At 16:56 -0500 Brian wrote:
>Mark London said:
>
>> I'm not messing with it, uvscan is doing it. Is there a better software
>> alternative that will delete viruses on the server? Are we the only
>> people using cyrus that are running virus scanning software on the
>> server?
But uvscan is treati
On Tuesday 21 January 2003 16:58 pm, Will Day wrote:
> A short time ago, at a computer terminal not so far away, Mark London wrote:
> >> If you're messing around with the internal data stores of a program, and
> >> then you get upset when the program doesn't work, I'd say that you've
> >> created y
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, John Alton Tamplin writes:
>Ted Cabeen wrote:
>>Right. Other than losing the flags data, are there any other downsides to
>>this solution? (We were thinking of using this to
Ted Cabeen wrote:
Right. Other than losing the flags data, are there any other downsides to
this solution? (We were thinking of using this to delete old messages from
users spam folders)
If your users all have spam folders named the same or similar
(presumably put there by spam filtering
On 21 Jan 2003, Mark London writes:
>>> Hi - We are running uvscan, and it will delete a cyrus message
>>> file that contains a virus. ...
>> If you're messing around with the internal data stores of a
>> program, and then you get upset when the program doesn't work, I'd
>> say that you've creat
Mark London said:
> I'm not messing with it, uvscan is doing it. Is there a better software
> alternative that will delete viruses on the server? Are we the only
> people using cyrus that are running virus scanning software on the
> server?
There was a discussion on this last week. Search the
On Tue, 21 Jan 2003, Mark London wrote:
> I'm not messing with it, uvscan is doing it. Is there a better software
You told it to...
> alternative that will delete viruses on the server? Are we the only people
Yes, you don't let the virus in the server on the first place, using a
content scanni
Mark London wrote:
I'm not messing with it, uvscan is doing it. Is there a better software
alternative that will delete viruses on the server? Are we the only people
using cyrus that are running virus scanning software on the server?
I think most people scanning their mail do so before it is
We run Interscan VirusWall--it only deleted the infected attachment, and
leaves the message intact (with a note inside telling the user that the
attachment was deleted). This makes for some confusion (the user still wants
the attachment, thinking it is real mail, and not just a virus. That seems
to
On 21 Jan 2003 at 16:31, Mark London wrote:
>
> I'm not messing with it, uvscan is doing it. Is there a better software
> alternative that will delete viruses on the server? Are we the only
> people using cyrus that are running virus scanning software on the
> server?
The only valid way to acc
On Tue, 21 Jan 2003, Ted Cabeen wrote:
> >(Note that you can also rebuild the mailbox with the reconstruct command,
> >but I don't recommend this as a general solution).
>
> Right. Other than losing the flags data, are there any other downsides to
> this solution? (We were thinking of using this
On Tue, 21 Jan 2003, Mark London wrote:
> I'm not messing with it, uvscan is doing it. Is there a better software
> alternative that will delete viruses on the server? Are we the only people
> using cyrus that are running virus scanning software on the server?
If you use sendmail, set up MIMEDe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Rob S
iemborski writes:
>On Tue, 21 Jan 2003, Mark London wrote:
>If you're messing around with the internal data stores of a program, and
>then you get upset when the program
On Tue, 21 Jan 2003, Mark London wrote:
> I'm not messing with it, uvscan is doing it. Is there a better software
> alternative that will delete viruses on the server? Are we the only people
> using cyrus that are running virus scanning software on the server?
Run a scanner as a part of your MT
> > Hi - We are running uvscan, and it will delete a cyrus message file that
> > contains a virus. Of course, cyrus doesn't know that the message is deleted,
> > so it still shows that message, albeit it shows up as being from Unknown with
> > (no subject). The problem is that this message can't
On Tue, 21 Jan 2003, Mark London wrote:
> Hi - We are running uvscan, and it will delete a cyrus message file that
> contains a virus. Of course, cyrus doesn't know that the message is deleted,
> so it still shows that message, albeit it shows up as being from Unknown with
> (no subject). The pr
Hi - We are running uvscan, and it will delete a cyrus message file that
contains a virus. Of course, cyrus doesn't know that the message is deleted,
so it still shows that message, albeit it shows up as being from Unknown with
(no subject). The problem is that this message can't be deleted, no m
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
On Tue, 21 Jan 2003, Thomas Hannan wrote:
Anyways, with the AMaViS virus filtering, could you clarify a bit? Does your
Get amavisd-new, tell your MTA to deliver to amavisd-new through SMTP, then
deliver it back to the MTA through SMTP, and let it deliver to
On Tue, 21 Jan 2003, Thomas Hannan wrote:
> Thanks for the clarification. i have to admit that I'd never worked with LMTP
> before I undertook this project...
>
> Anyways, with the AMaViS virus filtering, could you clarify a bit? Does your
> MX point to an AMaViS server which then forwards to
On Tue, 21 Jan 2003, Thomas Hannan wrote:
> Anyways, with the AMaViS virus filtering, could you clarify a bit? Does your
Get amavisd-new, tell your MTA to deliver to amavisd-new through SMTP, then
deliver it back to the MTA through SMTP, and let it deliver to Cyrus through
LMTP.
Trivial to do wi
Rob Siemborski wrote:
doc/readme.html:
If you wish to provide financial support to the Cyrus Project, send a
check payable to "Carnegie Mellon University" to
Project Cyrus
Computing Services
Carnegie Mellon University
5000 Forbes Ave
Pittsburgh, PA 15213
On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 11:09:56AM -0500, Ken Murchison wrote:
>
> Does fullhash use both upper and lower or just upper exclusively? (I
> could look at the code, but I'm being lazy)
It uses upper case exclusively, to distinguish it from the
original hash scheme.
--
-Gary Mills--Unix Suppor
On Monday 20 January 2003 19:52, Kendrick Vargas wrote:
Thanks for the clarification. i have to admit that I'd never worked with LMTP
before I undertook this project...
Anyways, with the AMaViS virus filtering, could you clarify a bit? Does your
MX point to an AMaViS server which then forwards
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
>
> On Tue, 21 Jan 2003, Ken Murchison wrote:
> > Did you compile with --enable-fulldirhash? If so, this might be the
> > problem because mkimap does not support this yet. That being said, I
> > didn't think that fulldirhash used upper case letters for the ha
On Tue, 21 Jan 2003, Ken Murchison wrote:
> Did you compile with --enable-fulldirhash? If so, this might be the
> problem because mkimap does not support this yet. That being said, I
> didn't think that fulldirhash used upper case letters for the hash
> directories. What does the path to this ma
> The cyrus quota doesn't include administrative files, such as
> cyrus.index and cyrus.cache -- the user is only "charged" for files they
> have control over. Rather than checking the filesystem directly, use
> /usr/local/cyrus/bin/quota (or wherever you installed it) and process
> that output,
Vittorio Manfredini wrote:
>
> I just install to test the cvs version and I activate it on a machine using a
> virtual domain.
>
> All seem to work fine, but when I try to set quota on a virtual domain mailbox I
> have an I/O error.
>
> When I read the log file I found this error :
> Jan 21 11
Mr Bullier Erick wrote:
I use quotas on mailbox with cyradmin.
I use scripts which check (in the night) if user go out the warning
limit (80%) of is mailbox quota.
Today, i see that a user maibox is 85% full.
So i use cyradm to check it, and cyradm write:
localhost> lq user.toto
STORAGE 5996/1000
Hello,
We've recently moved accounts from servers running 1.5.14 to
2.1.11. We've had several users report that all their messages
are being shown as New ( Unread ) by their email client and remain
so despite reading the messages.
Removing the users seen file fixes the problem for new mail.
We ho
Hi,
>From the previous posts in this mailing list about virutal domains I can
remember reading something about running mkimap before you could setup
virtual domain mailboxes... Try to browse this mailing list with some
keywords like virtual domains... I guess that's your problem.
Regards
Marc
I just install to test the cvs version and I activate it on a machine using a
virtual domain.
All seem to work fine, but when I try to set quota on a virtual domain mailbox I
have an I/O error.
When I read the log file I found this error :
Jan 21 11:08:06 www imap[1614]: IOERROR: creating quota
Last year, I had a question:
[...]
> But I'm not able to connect via POP3:
>
>
> as9(ke): telnet imp 110
> Trying 192.168.111.32...
> Connected to imp.ibbone.helinet.de.
> Escape character is '^]'.
> +OK imp Cyrus POP3 v2.1.3-Debian(unstable) server ready
> <424808546.1020438307@imp>
> use
Hello,
I use quotas on mailbox with cyradmin.
I use scripts which check (in the night) if user go out the warning
limit (80%) of is mailbox quota.
Today, i see that a user maibox is 85% full.
So i use cyradm to check it, and cyradm write:
localhost> lq user.toto
STORAGE 5996/1 (59%)
I didn't
40 matches
Mail list logo