Lawrence Greenfield wrote:
Well, "message delivery" and "mailbox names" are tightly
intertwined. How should I know that "leg+detail" should be delivered
to "user.leg.Detail"?
There is no historical usage that says imap folder names within a
mailbox aren't case sensitive, so I would say leg+De
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 16:48:49 -0500
From: John Alton Tamplin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[...]
There seem to be 3 places that have to be dealt with:
1) login
2) message delivery
3) mailbox names
It seems like 1 is very localized and a trivial change in
auth_canonifyid (if it
Lawrence Greenfield wrote:
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 16:31:15 -0500
From: John Alton Tamplin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Lawrence Greenfield wrote:
>I'm kinda unhappy about the limited scope of the patch. It makes
>usernames case-insensitive during delivery, but they're case-sensitive
>everywh
Lawrence Greenfield wrote:
I'm kinda unhappy about the limited scope of the patch. It makes
usernames case-insensitive during delivery, but they're case-sensitive
everywhere else. I'm not sure this is a great idea.
Maybe a global switch of case-sensitive mailbox names would make more
sense (thus
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 16:31:15 -0500
From: John Alton Tamplin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Lawrence Greenfield wrote:
>I'm kinda unhappy about the limited scope of the patch. It makes
>usernames case-insensitive during delivery, but they're case-sensitive
>everywhere else. I'm not sure
On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, Lawrence Greenfield wrote:
> Maybe a global switch of case-sensitive mailbox names would make more
> sense (thus LeG+detail -> user.leg.Detail, and "LEG" could log
> in). I'm not sure, though.
Nor am I. Should Cyrus do such a thing on its own? And if so, is this a
2.2-only typ
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 17:32:10 -0200
From: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, Ted Cabeen wrote:
> So is this patch going to make it into 2.1? I have the same
> problem here with LMTP downcasing, and would like to have a
> solution that doesn't
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
In message <20021226163734.GA5176@khazad-dum>, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh writ
es:
>On Thu, 26 Dec 2002, John Alton Tamplin wrote:
>> Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
>> >Here's the improved patch. It skip
On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, Ted Cabeen wrote:
> So is this patch going to make it into 2.1? I have the same problem here
> with LMTP downcasing, and would like to have a solution that doesn't require
> me to patch either postfix or cyrus, if possible.
Well, the patch proved itself stable, and it is in
--On Thursday, December 26, 2002 11:55 AM -0500 Scott Adkins
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[... sendmail +detail delivery ...]
Has anyone else had this problem (plussed folder emails sent to sendmail
that is configured to talk to LMTP directly, either my UNIX domain socket
or my TCP socket)? If so,
--On Wednesday, December 25, 2002 10:59 AM -0200 Henrique de Moraes
Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Here's the improved patch. It skips over the +Mailbox part of the
recipient, in the most straightforward way possible ;-)
Sorry, didn't see this message until too late... ignore my last post
On Thu, 26 Dec 2002, John Alton Tamplin wrote:
> Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> >Here's the improved patch. It skips over the +Mailbox part of the
> >recipient,
> >
> Would it make sense to make the control more generic, such as
> downcase_account_name, and have it also apply to logins and
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
Here's the improved patch. It skips over the +Mailbox part of the recipient,
in the most straightforward way possible ;-)
Would it make sense to make the control more generic, such as
downcase_account_name, and have it also apply to logins and other places
Here's the improved patch. It skips over the +Mailbox part of the recipient,
in the most straightforward way possible ;-)
--
"One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
where the shadows lie." -- The Si
14 matches
Mail list logo
