Re: [Exim] Cyrus/Exim incompatibility

2002-01-25 Thread John Holman
At 09:13 25/01/02, Phillip Hazel wrote: >On Thu, 24 Jan 2002, John Holman wrote: > > Actually, if it's true that there are no standards to be upheld, I also > > think it would be better for Exim (which claims to be a Sendmail clone > > insofar as the command line interface is concerned) to accept

Re: [Exim] Cyrus/Exim incompatibility

2002-01-25 Thread Philip Hazel
On Thu, 24 Jan 2002, John Holman wrote: > My guess is that there is no real standard, but I think it makes sense when > passing a message to an MTA via stdin to comply with the conventions of the > local operating system. That would mean LF under Unix, CRLF under Windows etc. This seemed to me t

Re: [Exim] Cyrus/Exim incompatibility

2002-01-24 Thread Cyrus Daboo
--On Thursday, January 24, 2002 12:04 PM -0500 Ken Murchison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yeah, I mentioned this to Larry a while back, but he didn't really like > the idea. I don't remember his exact reasoning, but I think it had > something to do with not knowing whether the reject/vacation m

Re: [Exim] Cyrus/Exim incompatibility

2002-01-24 Thread Ken Murchison
John Holman wrote: > > At 15:25 24/01/02, Ken Murchison wrote: > > >Philip Hazel wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, 23 Jan 2002, John Holman wrote: > > > > > > > Messages generated by Cyrus's lmtpd (e.g. as the result of a sieve > > vacation > > > > or reject rule) are created with CRLF as line termin

Re: [Exim] Cyrus/Exim incompatibility

2002-01-24 Thread John Holman
At 15:25 24/01/02, Ken Murchison wrote: >Philip Hazel wrote: > > > > On Wed, 23 Jan 2002, John Holman wrote: > > > > > Messages generated by Cyrus's lmtpd (e.g. as the result of a sieve > vacation > > > or reject rule) are created with CRLF as line terminators and piped > to the > > > mail prog

Re: Cyrus/Exim incompatibility

2002-01-24 Thread John Holman
At 16:05 24/01/02, Lawrence Greenfield wrote: >Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2002 09:49:59 + (GMT) >From: Philip Hazel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >On Wed, 23 Jan 2002, John Holman wrote: > >> Messages generated by Cyrus's lmtpd (e.g. as the result of a sieve > vacation >> or reject rule)

Re: [Exim] Cyrus/Exim incompatibility

2002-01-24 Thread Lawrence Greenfield
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2002 09:49:59 + (GMT) From: Philip Hazel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> On Wed, 23 Jan 2002, John Holman wrote: > Messages generated by Cyrus's lmtpd (e.g. as the result of a sieve vacation > or reject rule) are created with CRLF as line terminators and piped to the

Re: [Exim] Cyrus/Exim incompatibility

2002-01-24 Thread Ken Murchison
Philip Hazel wrote: > > On Wed, 23 Jan 2002, John Holman wrote: > > > Messages generated by Cyrus's lmtpd (e.g. as the result of a sieve vacation > > or reject rule) are created with CRLF as line terminators and piped to the > > mail program (by default sendmail, which in our case is actually

Re: [Exim] Cyrus/Exim incompatibility

2002-01-24 Thread Philip Hazel
On Wed, 23 Jan 2002, John Holman wrote: > Messages generated by Cyrus's lmtpd (e.g. as the result of a sieve vacation > or reject rule) are created with CRLF as line terminators and piped to the > mail program (by default sendmail, which in our case is actually > exim). Messages presented to sen

Re: Cyrus/Exim incompatibility

2002-01-24 Thread John Holman
At 04:57 24/01/02, Amos Gouaux wrote: >jh> Messages generated by Cyrus's lmtpd (e.g. as the result of a sieve >jh> vacation or reject rule) are created with CRLF as line terminators >jh> and piped to the mail program (by default sendmail, which in our >jh> case is actually exim). Messages present

Re: Cyrus/Exim incompatibility

2002-01-23 Thread Amos Gouaux
> On Wed, 23 Jan 2002 14:36:22 +, > John Holman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (jh) writes: jh> We have hit a problem previously reported to this list by Frank jh> Richter on Sept 27 last year. It affects users of Cyrus with Exim jh> (and possibly some other MTAs). Apparently not with Sendmail