Ok, I'm attaching the patch. This is for 1.6.24,
and there are some things that could use some
work. Right now, all the LDAP stuff is set with
defines (this was done for a specific case, so
that was fine at the time). This was pretty much
directly taken from the auth_unix.c groups setup.
If
Yes, having LDAP groups would make shared mailboxes usable in our
organization without adding a great deal of administration overhead as
it would without LDAP.
Todd Nemanich wrote:
> I actually have some code to do LDAP based groups. It is not
> excessively flexible, because I don't really kn
I actually have some code to do LDAP based groups.
It is not excessively flexible, because I don't
really know LDAP. But I'm sure it could be easily
adapted to take the search constraints as a
configuration option. Is anyone interested in this?
Lawrence Greenfield wrote:
>From: "Tim Push
From: "Tim Pushor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2001 14:38:31 -0700
While we are talking about taking cyrus and SASL to the next level, is there
any plan to remove the dependance that Cyrus has on UNIX groups for group
based ACL's?
Well, it doesn't. It can also use the A
While we are talking about taking cyrus and SASL to the next level, is there
any plan to remove the dependance that Cyrus has on UNIX groups for group
based ACL's?
- Original Message -
From: "Jeremy Howard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Christopher D. Audley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Cyrus Mailing
