Yes, having LDAP groups would make shared mailboxes usable in our organization without adding a great deal of administration overhead as it would without LDAP.
Todd Nemanich wrote: > I actually have some code to do LDAP based groups. It is not > excessively flexible, because I don't really know LDAP. But I'm sure > it could be easily adapted to take the search constraints as a > configuration option. Is anyone interested in this? > > Lawrence Greenfield wrote: > >> From: "Tim Pushor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2001 14:38:31 -0700 >> >> While we are talking about taking cyrus and SASL to the next >> level, is there >> any plan to remove the dependance that Cyrus has on UNIX groups >> for group >> based ACL's? >> >> Well, it doesn't. It can also use the AFS PTS server for groups. >> We (CMU) haven't written anything else because we haven't yet needed >> anything else. I can easily imagine an LDAP authorization module >> working much the same way the PTS authorization module works, and it's >> something we'll probably look into doing, but only when we really feel >> the need. >> >> It shouldn't be all that hard for someone else to write such an LDAP >> authorization module. >> >> Larry >> >> >> > > > -- Jules Agee System Administrator Pacific Coast Feather Co. [EMAIL PROTECTED] x284 Private communication between citizens is necessary to ensure the continued preservation of freedom. For more information, see: http://www.computerprivacy.org/archive/03171998-5.shtml http://www.gnupg.org My public encryption key is available here: http://keyserver.pgp.com/pks/lookup?op=get&exact=on&search=0x21662FE4
