See Comments Inline:
Greg
On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 12:13:21PM +0200, Klaus Jaehne wrote:
>
> On Tue, 23 Oct 2001, Greg Hewett wrote:
> > My experience has been that cyrus fails over pretty clean. Depending
> > on the number of users, it might not make sense to reconstuct the
> > databases at a
On Tue, 23 Oct 2001, Greg Hewett wrote:
> My experience has been that cyrus fails over pretty clean. Depending
> on the number of users, it might not make sense to reconstuct the
> databases at a time of fail over.
OK, thanks for the information - I've got some more questions:
- "fails over pre
My experience has been that cyrus fails over pretty clean. Depending on the
number of users, it might not make sense to reconstuct the databases at a time
of fail over.
Greg
On Tue, Oct 23, 2001 at 02:10:47PM +0200, Klaus Jaehne wrote:
>
> We are going to set up a failover solution for a cyrus
We are going to set up a failover solution for a cyrus IMAP server with
two machines and a shared disk array (which holds a journaling file
system). Now I assume one machine has failed and the second one is taking
over the file system - is it safe to start cyrus on the second machine
immediately
