We use the Novell Messenger built into the client. Teachers use it
quite often for hall passes, etc.
Manson Northwest Webster-Home of the Cougars!
Brad Kruse ("`-''-/").___..--''"`-._
Tech. Coord. `6_ 6 ) `-. ( ).`-.__.`)
1601 15th St.(_Y_.)' ._ ) `._ `. ``-.
I am thinking outside of the box with the thought of giving staff an IM to use
to IM immediate communications. Do any of you do this and if you have; what IM
software did you use, how did you implement it, how did you teach the staff to
use it, and was it beneficial or not?
Figured I wouldn't
I installed 10.1 and it had no problems detecting the wireless etc in my 450SX.
The very first linux distro I evet used was Mandrake mmm 6.something but I
have not ever used it since then. I have heard very good things about suse. I
know they have always been very solid. I guess I did instal
>
>10.1 is very solid.
Have either of you tried Mandrake 10 or Suse 9.3? They both found all the
drivers in my gateway 450SX laptops - (former BVU machines) - even the wireless
cards. And with SuSE AutoYast updates were slick, checking dependencies as
needed and downloading
before installing.
I run slackware 10.1 on my desk here at school, I have 10.1 that runs my
asterisk server, and 10.1 for my computer at home.
10.1 is very solid. Patrick knows what he is doing! I think the install is
very unbloated and very fast compared to fedora core (I am sure you know how I
feel about Red
I had a heck of a time trying to get the modules loaded for debian as well
as for Fedora Core 3. Then I tried slackware and I was good-to-go on the
first try. Have you tried slack 10.1? It seems rock solid to me and is easy
to install - if you don't mind the text-based installs.
Oh, I read the ot
I understand now. Slackware has always been easy for me to get the correct
modules auto loaded for raid devices. Where I agree debian and Redhat has
sometimes been more difficult to get the correct modules.
I did a full ftp install of debian and it was 2 gigs to downloaded and 8 gigs
total
Nope, hardware RAID. I've never used software RAID at all.I set it up so
that all of the Linux Machines have the same /home folder. Even the
dual-boot systems. I put slackware on everything because the links from the
home folder are all the same. I could have (and probably will have a few
Mepis box
I have used Slackware for more then 5 years, but I installed debian the other
day becase of it's simple package upgrade system. I have had an issue with
slackware-current breaking things for example slackware-current upgraded libc
from 2.3.3 to 2.3.4 it broke almost everything.
Your using soft
Apples bread and butter has always been there hardware.
otherwise they would port their OS to wintel machines now. From a
conversation with a Mac employee, they have it running but they know that
their hardware sales would drop.
btw, John, I switched all my LTSP servers over to slackware - I kn
I use pearpc to emulate mac os X it does not currently work with 10.4 but
10.3.9 and lower it does. It can be slow at times, but it works well when I am
developing software I am able to test in multiple enviroments. It emulates a
ppc. But it runs on any X86 based processor. Including on top
Lance wrote:
>
>There are kids running Linux on X Boxes in
>the world so nothing is impossible
Indeed. The newest XBox runs the PowerPC chip, so now the kiddies can load
Yellow Dog Linux. Weird that MS moved from Intel to the PowerPC. Weirder yet
that _Apple_ switched camps. Is there no norma
The Darwin kernel has run on Intel since its inception. The GUI was not
available on the Intel platform so it was all CLI.
As far as thinking that you could run OS X on a PC, that is probably not
going to be true right out of the box. There will probably be safeguards
against non apple branded eq
13 matches
Mail list logo
