On 04/29/2014 03:24 AM, sisyph...@optusnet.com.au wrote:
-Original Message- From: Reini Urban
Yes, we at rperl are quite happy how it turned out. Thanks Rob!
You're welcome. Many thanks to you and the other contributors.
There are still some minor issues I wanted to work on, but had
-Original Message-
From: Reini Urban
Yes, we at rperl are quite happy how it turned out. Thanks Rob!
You're welcome. Many thanks to you and the other contributors.
There are still some minor issues I wanted to work on, but had no time
yet.
No rush - I can deal with them as they ge
From: David Oswald
Excellent community involvement. I hope Inline::CPP becomes the target of
similar attention someday.
I very much agree (on both points).
Cheers,
Rob
On 04/28/2014 10:40 AM, David Oswald wrote:
Excellent community involvement. I hope Inline::CPP becomes the target
of similar attention someday.
Yes, we at rperl are quite happy how it turned out. Thanks Rob!
There are still some minor issues I wanted to work on,
but had no time yet.
- need t
Excellent community involvement. I hope Inline::CPP becomes the target of
similar attention someday.
In particular, strange test-concurrency related failures (it's possible
that the changes in Inline fixed this for me) problems with multiple
inheritance, better compatibility with template program
Hi,
No changes from Inline-0.54_05.
Changes from Inline-0.54:
Add META.yml & META.json to distro
Inline.pod - Add documentation regarding "with" and modules. (Thanks to Ed
J.)
Inline.pm - import Fcntl constants for flock (rurban).
Inline.pm - flock only on supported platforms, would die on V