On 5/20/2017 5:08 PM, Tom Herbert wrote:
> Joe, I'm not sure I understand your point about IPv0. GUE v0
> encapsulates packets of any IP prolocol number (IP, GRE, MPLS,
> EtherIP. ...) and allows for data messages as well as control
> messages. GUE v1 directly encapsulates IPv4 and IPv6 in a form
On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 4:16 PM, Joe Touch wrote:
>
>
> On 5/19/2017 11:09 PM, Xuxiaohu wrote:
>
> GUE is supposed to be both signalling and content (data), where the data are
> IP
> packets.
>
> Since IANA strives to assign one port for a service, IP packet within the
> UDP tunnel should be assig
On 5/19/2017 11:09 PM, Xuxiaohu wrote:
>> GUE is supposed to be both signalling and content (data), where the data are
>> IP
>> packets.
> Since IANA strives to assign one port for a service, IP packet within the UDP
> tunnel should be assigned a dedicated port. In other words, GUE and IP-in-UD
On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 11:09 PM, Xuxiaohu wrote:
>
>
>> -邮件原件-
>> 发件人: Joe Touch [mailto:to...@isi.edu]
>> 发送时间: 2017年5月20日 12:15
>> 收件人: Xuxiaohu; Tom Herbert
>> 抄送: int-area@ietf.org
>> 主题: Re: 答复: [Int-area] 答复: Is the UDP destination port number resource
>> running out?// re: I-D Acti
On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 6:39 PM, Xuxiaohu wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> Thanks for your quick response. Please see my reply inline.
>
>> -邮件原件-
>> 发件人: Tom Herbert [mailto:t...@herbertland.com]
>> 发送时间: 2017年5月19日 22:57
>> 收件人: Xuxiaohu
>> 抄送: int-area@ietf.org
>> 主题: Re: [Int-area] Is the UDP dest
