On 7/17/2017 3:01 PM, Sérgio Martins wrote:
... ... ...
It fell through the cracks and there's a failing unit-test,
I'll try to fix it for 5.9.2.
Regards,
Sérgio Martins
Sérgio, thank you. That would be really great.
___
Interest mailing list
about the
disposition of this problem?
Thank you in advance.
Phil Weinstein, CADSWES, Boulder CO, USA.
___
Interest mailing list
Interest@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
Trolltech sighting, Feb 2017, Colorado USA
http://www.thirdtablet.com/2017/Sightings/Trolltech.jpg
---
___
Interest mailing list
Interest@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
This is apparently a change from Qt4 to Qt5. (We're using Qt 5.5.1).
When hovering over a GUI control having a Tooltip, at the moment the
Tooltip is shown, the window containing that control is RAISED. This is
very undesirable, potentially obscuring the window the user is trying to
work
Konstantin, as you suggested, I am trying to build this source, to merge
into my Qt 5.6.2 build:
* http://download.qt.io/community_releases/5.6/5.6.2/
(BTW, IS THERE a more appropriate forum on which I can ask questions
about building QtWebKit?)
After running the Qt 5.6.2 qmake.exe, the
Konstantin, as you suggested, I am trying to build this source, to merge
into my Qt 5.8.2 build:
* http://download.qt.io/community_releases/5.6/5.6.2/
(BTW, IS THERE a more appropriate forum on which I can ask questions
about building QtWebKit?)
After running the Qt 5.6.2 qmake.exe, the
was
kinda surprised at the suggestion, as I understood that binary
compatibility was assured only between different patches within a minor
release).
On 10/27/2016 12:39 PM, Konstantin Tokarev wrote:
27.10.2016, 21:33, "Phil Weinstein"<ph...@indra.com>:
I may have misunderstoo
the webkit and webkitwidgets modules from Qt 5.6.2. If so,
how do I get those modules into that configure and build?
(Note that we are still using VS 2010 SP1, on Windows 8.1, so I can't
use anything from Qt 5.7).
On 10/27/2016 12:56 AM, Phil Weinstein wrote:
Thiago, thanks /so much/ for th
:
On quarta-feira, 26 de outubro de 2016 18:04:41 PDT Phil Weinstein wrote:
Thiago, thanks for this response. (And Giuseppe and Konstantin too).
I realize that it might be hard to be 100% confident in this, but DO YOU
THINK that ...
... IF WE LEAVE OUT _QWebEngine_ from the Qt 5.7.0 (or Qt 5.6.2
Thiago, thanks for this response. (And Giuseppe and Konstantin too).
I realize that it might be hard to be 100% confident in this, but DO YOU
THINK that ...
... IF WE LEAVE OUT _QWebEngine_ from the Qt 5.7.0 (or Qt 5.6.2) source
code build, we could build that with Visual Studio 2010 SP1 on
the
intention for the future of these respective styles_ ... _Fusion_ and
_WindowsVista_. We have A LOT of user interface documentation which
would have to be updated if we "need" to move to Fusion.
On 10/26/2016 12:10 PM, Phil Weinstein wrote:
It would be helpful for us to k
g of taking the dive in switching from WindowsVista to
Fusion. But we'd first like to get an indication of how long that style
will be recommended and well supported.
Thank you in advance,
Phil Weinstein, CADSWES
___
Interest mailing list
Interest@qt-project
ideos (i.e. animations generated programmatically, saved as
video files). http://www.webmproject.org/about/
- Phil
On 1/24/2016 11:50 AM, Phil Weinstein wrote:
Relative to this topic, "*Video file generation from Qt application,*
other than FFmpeg" (on this "interest" e-mail list,
Relative to this topic, "*Video file generation from Qt application,*
other than FFmpeg" (on this "interest" e-mail list, in the wrong place,
and also thread:
https://forum.qt.io/topic/63105/video-file-generation-from-qt-application-other-than-ffmpeg)
there's been suggestions in related Qt
thing).
Can anyone point me to authoritative information delineating why /and
how/ these things CAN be used in commercial applications?
- Phil
On 1/21/2016 1:46 PM, Samuel Gaist wrote:
On 21 janv. 2016, at 21:15, Phil Weinstein<ph...@indra.com> wrote:
We will not be able to use the FFmpeg libr
Jason, could you, or someone else elaborate on what this means? I am
now seeing, in Qt 5.5, the QMediaRecorder class (not in Qt4) ...
http://doc.qt.io/qt-5.5/qmediarecorder.html ... Use of this for
recording video seems to need us to set the "codec" /by name,/ somehow
found on the system, I
We will not be able to use the FFmpeg library for video generation from
our Qt application. Are there any other tools/products usable with Qt
which can do basic generation of video files, given a sequence of
QImages or QPixmaps? We don't need audio with the video.
We will not be able to use the FFmpeg library for video generation from
our Qt application. Are there any other tools/products usable with Qt
which can do basic generation of video files, given a sequence of
QImages or QPixmaps? We don't need audio with the video.
(Sorry for the repost. My
= tr ("It's rude to point");
}
}
Phil Weinstein, CADSWES, Colorado, USA
---
On 11/4/2015 6:23 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote:
On Wednesday 04 November 2015 15:54:41 Phil Weinstein wrote:
QUESTION: Is there a way to force the initialization of QMetaObject data
to avoid this CR
QUESTION: What might be causing these MOC and QCommandLineParser errors?
Attached: Vs2010-Moc-Failure.txt
Thank you in advance,
Phil Weinstein, CADSWES, Colorado, USA
1>-- Build started: Project: QtRunGenerated, Configuration: Debug x64 --
2>-- Build started: P
ntralized" solution, e.g. an explicit
global initialization call.
Thank you in advance,
Phil Weinstein, CADSWES, Colorado, USA
---
___
Interest mailing list
Interest@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
by providing a sequence of QImages or QPixmaps having consistent
dimensions, perhaps with a specified frame rate. Short of that, are
there any well supported third-party Qt packages for doing this?
Thanks in advance,
Phil Weinstein
CADSWES, University of Colorado
Does anyone know how the declarative nature of QML can be described in
E-Prime? (English without the verb, to be).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E-Prime
___
Interest mailing list
Interest@qt-project.org
Personally, I'm VERY happy that Qt collection sizes are signed. It seems
nuts to me that an integer value potentially used in an expression using
_subtraction_ be unsigned (e.g. size_t).
An integer being unsigned doesn't guarantee that an expression involving
that integer will never be
24 matches
Mail list logo
