Thanks for the list. I added manifests for most of them to the git repository
now. The proprietary libraries I added to the Wiki
(https://github.com/cornelius/inqlude-data/wiki) for now, so we can include
them, when we have implemented showing them in a separate category.
A few questions on spe
Thanks for the list. I added manifests for the projects which have releases to
the git repo.
For the libraries which haven't been released yet, where just a source code
repository exists I intend to add a special section in Inqlude. This needs a
few changes in the format and tooling, so it will
On 07/10/2013 07:43 PM, Cornelius Schumacher wrote:
> We all know that Qt is great, but we also know that it can't possibly cover
> all use cases. Fortunately there are plenty of third party libraries based on
> Qt, which fill a lot of gaps, so you don't have to develop everything
> yourself.
>
> F
Op 10-10-2013 19:04, Konstantin Tokarev schreef:
>
> 09.10.2013, 10:21, "André Somers" :
>> Op 9-10-2013 7:34, Cornelius Schumacher schreef:
>>
>>> On Tuesday 08 October 2013 06:48:38 BRM wrote:
Cool - I don't have any at this time, but it's good information to have
and
I'm su
09.10.2013, 10:21, "André Somers" :
> Op 9-10-2013 7:34, Cornelius Schumacher schreef:
>
>> On Tuesday 08 October 2013 06:48:38 BRM wrote:
>>> Cool - I don't have any at this time, but it's good information to have and
>>> I'm sure others here do; and yes, listing the license is perhaps the on
On Tue, 2013-10-08 at 00:08 +0200, Cornelius Schumacher wrote:
> On Monday 07 October 2013 14:22:40 BRM wrote:
> > Out of curiosity, are you looking to list proprietary 3rd party Qt libraries
> > as well? Or just Open Source compatible libraries?
Cornelius Schumacher wrote:
...
> It probably woul
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 11:51 AM, André Somers wrote:
> Op 9-10-2013 7:34, Cornelius Schumacher schreef:
> > On Tuesday 08 October 2013 06:48:38 BRM wrote:
> >> Cool - I don't have any at this time, but it's good information to have
> and
> >> I'm sure others here do; and yes, listing the license i
Op 9-10-2013 7:34, Cornelius Schumacher schreef:
> On Tuesday 08 October 2013 06:48:38 BRM wrote:
>> Cool - I don't have any at this time, but it's good information to have and
>> I'm sure others here do; and yes, listing the license is perhaps the one
>> change that would be good to do - even for
On Tuesday 08 October 2013 06:48:38 BRM wrote:
>
> Cool - I don't have any at this time, but it's good information to have and
> I'm sure others here do; and yes, listing the license is perhaps the one
> change that would be good to do - even for the Open Source libraries.
The license is already
From: Cornelius Schumacher
To: interest@qt-project.org
Sent: Monday, October 7, 2013 6:08 PM
Subject: Re: [Interest] Looking for third party Qt libraries
> On Monday 07 October 2013 14:22:40 BRM wrote:
> > Out of curiosity, are you looking to list proprietary 3rd party Qt libraries
&g
Op 7-10-2013 11:43, Cornelius Schumacher schreef:
Are you releasing a Qt-based library? Do you know of libraries, which aren't
listed yet?
Here is my own private list of useful Qt libraries:
Reports
*NCReport*
Report engine & designer module
commercial
http://www.nocisoft.com/ncreport.html
*Oth
The ones I've been developing:
QtModeling -> http://qt.gitorious.org/qt/qtmodeling /
http://qt-project.org/wiki/QtModeling
QtOptimization ->http://gitorious.org/qtoptimization/qtoptimization
Both are intended to to be delivered as Qt add-on modules in the future.
Thanks,
--
Sandro
On Mon, Oct
On Monday 07 October 2013 14:22:40 BRM wrote:
> Out of curiosity, are you looking to list proprietary 3rd party Qt libraries
> as well? Or just Open Source compatible libraries?
I would be open to listing proprietary libraries as well. This obviously is an
important part of the Qt ecosystem, so i
On Monday 07 October 2013 20:24:01 André Pönitz wrote:
>
> I am not quite sure how having yet-another-site could benefit the project
> _at all_. Why can't this be done under qt-project.org?
It's a bit more than a Wiki, so we need some different infrastructure. In any
case it's something meant to
On Monday 07 October 2013 18:25:16 Konstantin Tokarev wrote:
> Why is it needed to oppose Qt libraries to the rest of C++ world?
This is not meant to be in opposition to the C++ world, but a focused start.
Using Qt usually means taking certain design decisions and choosing a specific
way how to
On Monday 07 October 2013 22:21:00 Sze Howe Koh wrote:
> A few months ago I started recording the libraries/classes that I came
> across. Here's what I got:
>
> QDbf: https://code.google.com/p/qdbf/
> QSerialPort: http://sourceforge.net/projects/qserialport/ (NOT the
> official Qt 5 module)
> Qext
third party Qt libraries
We all know that Qt is great, but we also know that it can't possibly cover
all use cases. Fortunately there are plenty of third party libraries based on
Qt, which fill a lot of gaps, so you don't have to develop everything
yourself.
Finding these 3r
On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 11:43:37AM +0200, Cornelius Schumacher wrote:
> We all know that Qt is great, but we also know that it can't possibly cover
> all use cases. Fortunately there are plenty of third party libraries based on
> Qt, which fill a lot of gaps, so you don't have to develop everythi
Why is it needed to oppose Qt libraries to the rest of C++ world?
--
Regards,
Konstantin
___
Interest mailing list
Interest@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
I'm not seeing PythonQt either: http://pythonqt.sourceforge.net/
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 9:21 AM, Sze Howe Koh wrote:
> A few months ago I started recording the libraries/classes that I came
> across. Here's what I got:
>
> QDbf: https://code.google.com/p/qdbf/
> QSerialPort: http://sourceforge.
A few months ago I started recording the libraries/classes that I came
across. Here's what I got:
QDbf: https://code.google.com/p/qdbf/
QSerialPort: http://sourceforge.net/projects/qserialport/ (NOT the
official Qt 5 module)
QextSerialPort: http://sourceforge.net/projects/qextserialport/
QtComPort
Looks like qtuiotouch https://github.com/dancasimiro/qtuiotouch is
missing as well.
Thanks for this archive, I think we all know the frustrating feeling
when it comes to this sort of things.
2013/10/7 Jonathan Greig :
> I didn't see Qtuio listed: http://qtuio.sirbabyface.net/
>
>
>
> On Mon, Oct
I didn't see Qtuio listed: http://qtuio.sirbabyface.net/
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 4:43 AM, Cornelius Schumacher wrote:
> We all know that Qt is great, but we also know that it can't possibly cover
> all use cases. Fortunately there are plenty of third party libraries based
> on
> Qt, which fill a
We all know that Qt is great, but we also know that it can't possibly cover
all use cases. Fortunately there are plenty of third party libraries based on
Qt, which fill a lot of gaps, so you don't have to develop everything
yourself.
Finding these 3rd party Qt libraries can be a challenge, thou
24 matches
Mail list logo
