On Fri, July 13, 2007 2:35 pm, Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
We have started a project to make it easier to support international
markets using PHP. A number of internationalization functions from IBM
ICU will be made available in PHP as an extension.
I realize that my natural state is the state
So now there's going to be a PHP-ICU extension for PHP 5 and PHP 6,
and PHP 6 will have ICU built-in to such an extent that it's backwards
compatible with PHP 5?
Both extensions would be (are being) written in such a way that code
that worked on PHP 5 would work on PHP 6, with regard to the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
as only being a general lurker on this list, I remmeber when Namespaces
came up the first time, there were some technical problems (or just
syntactical sugar ones?) with the :: operator also being used as a
namespace separate additional being a
Hi,
as only being a general lurker on this list, I remember when Namespaces
came up the first time, there were some technical problems (or just
syntactical sugar ones?) with the :: operator also being used as a
Namespace separate additional being a class separator.
How has this been handled or
David Wang kirjoitti:
This patch is a simple, albeit widespread change that converts access
to zval.refcount, zval.is_ref, _object_store.refcount to macros. There
is no functional change to the code, but this will make it easier to
implement a garbage collector in the future.
Was there some
Sara Golemon kirjoitti:
Attached is a patch which exports an internals hook in zend_class_entry
for fetching function pointers similar to the object hook get_method()
available to instance methods.
This patch also exports a userspace hook __call_static() which operates
in the fashion of the
On Saturday 14 July 2007, Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
So now there's going to be a PHP-ICU extension for PHP 5 and PHP 6,
and PHP 6 will have ICU built-in to such an extent that it's backwards
compatible with PHP 5?
Both extensions would be (are being) written in such a way that code
that
Jani Taskinen schrieb:
As long as you MFH, I don't mind.
Yeah, I would love to have this in PHP_5_2, too. :)
--
Sebastian Bergmann http://sebastian-bergmann.de/
GnuPG Key: 0xB85B5D69 / 27A7 2B14 09E4 98CD 6277 0E5B 6867 C514 B85B 5D69
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime
I am trying to debug my custom TCP stack which is running under Linux
OS. Do to some bug in my stack or missing feature I am getting error
following from php.
failed to open stream
Which I have traced to file: php-4.4.7/main/streams.c and function:
_php_stream_open_wrapper_ex
stream
as only being a general lurker on this list, I remember when Namespaces
came up the first time, there were some technical problems (or just
syntactical sugar ones?) with the :: operator also being used as a
Namespace separate additional being a class separator.
How has this been handled or are
So (from another character-set-intricacy-challenged individual),
would ICU it be analogous to the DOM functions for manipulating
XML-like structures? (The methods parentNode(), childNodes(),
appendNode(), etc. are all supposed to mean the same thing in every
language.)
I'm not sure I
I'm afraid this change is binary incompatible - it changes class
structure, which is in use by extensions. So you'd need 5.3 for that.
Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
Jani Taskinen schrieb:
As long as you MFH, I don't mind.
Yeah, I would love to have this in PHP_5_2, too. :)
--
Stanislav
Was there some particular reason to remove those ()'s around the macros?
(usually they're there for a reason :)
Also, extra ; is not needed and doesn't conform to the style of other
PHP code. Macros usually don't need ; at the end.
Also, these:
+#define ZVAL_ADDREF(pz)
The Apache2handler SAPI should be loaded first, and read the very
first line of the PHP script to determine if a version is specified
there. If not, the handler needs to load its default PHP version. If
it is specified, it should try to load that version, and if it
couldn't find or load that
And there is no reason not to release 5.3 is there?
I'd also like to MFH the namespace patch for PHP 5.
well, that's topic for another discussion, I just wanted to remind that
it can't be in PHP_5_2.
--
Stanislav Malyshev, Zend Software Architect
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.zend.com/
And there is no reason not to release 5.3 is there?
I'd also like to MFH the namespace patch for PHP 5.
--Jani
Stanislav Malyshev kirjoitti:
I'm afraid this change is binary incompatible - it changes class
structure, which is in use by extensions. So you'd need 5.3 for that.
Sebastian
Hi,
Thanks for getting back to me quickly.
Was there some particular reason to remove those ()'s around the
macros?
(usually they're there for a reason :)
The reason for doing this is that in GC code ++(pz)-refcount; becomes
++(pz)-refcount; (pz)-color__gc = GC_BLACK;. Those are two
On Wed, July 11, 2007 9:02 pm, chris# wrote:
Getting 2 PHP modules to co-exist without tromping on each others'
symbols is, I think, the show-stopper...
It was possible to have PHP3 and PHP4 both as modules, I think, but
that was an anomoly?
So which one of the developers broke this
On Wed, July 11, 2007 9:14 pm, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
Richard, you are rather confused on this Unicode stuff.
I'm 100% certain we can all agree on that point. :-)
The fact that
PHP and ICU uses UTF-16 internally has absolutely nothing to do with
what is exposed at the scripting level.
But
But if you write:
$a = マニュアル;
echo $a[1];
Whoa.
That was weird...
It was just a bunch of question marks when I read it, and now it's a
bunch of symbols (variants on afz mostly) in my reply...
Your browser or operating system does not support Japanese symbols and
translation selected in
On 14.07.2007 10:51, Usman S. Ansari wrote:
I am trying to debug my custom TCP stack which is running under Linux
OS. Do to some bug in my stack or missing feature I am getting error
following from php.
failed to open stream
Which I have traced to file: php-4.4.7/main/streams.c and function:
+#define ZVAL_ADDREF(pz)++(pz)-refcount;
+#define ZVAL_ADDREF_M(pz, count) (pz)-refcount += (count);
_M? Doesn't seem to be self-descriptive..
+#define ZVAL_ADDREF_NP(pz) ++(pz).refcount;
_NP ? not pointer ?
Most of the macros in the engine
That sounds good in my ears.
Software that relys on old non-unicode behaviour must be written in a
way two handle non-unicode and Unicode behaviour in two different ways.
But for example a rewritten Squirrelmail that runs exlusively on PHP6
would be a good thing.
So you could write on your
Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
Hi all!
We have started a project to make it easier to support international
markets using PHP. A number of internationalization functions from IBM
ICU will be made available in PHP as an extension.
I notice normalization is not on your list. Would you consider
On 7/14/07, Stanislav Malyshev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Apache2handler SAPI should be loaded first, and read the very
first line of the PHP script to determine if a version is specified
there. If not, the handler needs to load its default PHP version. If
it is specified, it should try to
Tijnema wrote:
On 7/14/07, Stanislav Malyshev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Apache2handler SAPI should be loaded first, and read the very
first line of the PHP script to determine if a version is specified
there. If not, the handler needs to load its default PHP version. If
it is
+#define ZVAL_ADDREF(pz) ++(pz)-refcount;
+#define ZVAL_ADDREF_M(pz, count) (pz)-refcount += (count);
_M? Doesn't seem to be self-descriptive..
It was supposed to stand for multiple', but you're right that it's not very
clear.
+#define ZVAL_ADDREF_NP(pz)
Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
Not to sound too elitist here, and this is directed just at you
Argh! That should of course have been, this isn't directed just at you...
-Rasmus
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On Jul 11, 2007, at 4:43 PM, David Wang wrote:
On the Template test, maxmium memory usage with unmodified PHP was 1.5
GB with an execution time of 30 seconds.
On the Template test, maxmium memory usage with gc was 67.3 MB with an
execution time of 1 minute.
...
As you can see,
there is the
On Saturday 14 July 2007, Tijnema wrote:
So from a tiny non-representative sample, I'm looking at about 2 out
of 6 webhosts I've experienced.
YMMV
I never saw a shared host with more than one PHP version installed
actually, probably becaues they were all with Apache and not with
Thomas Moenicke wrote:
This is actually a very good idea. I had to put a hook into the opcode handler
for static method calls to get the same result which is not really elegant. I
was waiting for this feature for a couple month.
Also I found out that the names of the static methods are already
I have a patch adding the GC that's taken against the patch I
submitted earlier (converting accesses to refcount and is_ref to
macros).
Patch: http://web.pdx.edu/~way/frommacros.diff.txt
The two new files, zend_gc.c and zend_gc.h go in the Zend folder:
http://web.pdx.edu/~way/zend_gc.c
David Wang wrote:
Is it possible that total server throughput with gc could actually be
better than unmodified php by preventing swapping at some higher
level of concurrent requests?
Yes, that's certainly true if it becomes the case that concurrent
requests take up so much memory that they
Great news...
i was waiting for some movement on this front. i suppost there will be web
project space for this ?
also, i'd like to see specs if available. i may have some spare cycles to
put some work in. in addition i
have some code sitting around implementing various bits of i18n
David,
On Jul 14, 2007, at 1:55 PM, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
It is still extremely rare for code to have cyclic references. So
while
GC could prevent swapping in the case of a malicious user, or in the
case of a coding mistake, I don't think the general case of typical
code
running under
So I was using create_function() in various ways, and I said to
myself, this would look SO much better if I could use a heredoc that
acted like a single-quoted string. Then I said to myself, Wait. I
know the PHP internals. Why don't I build a new syntax into the
language? The result was a
Hi Pavel,
Pavel Shevaev wrote:
Folks, is this really wanted behavior? Because if so, why does the
following result in the same hash as well(PHP-5.2.1)?
$ php -r class Foo{};$foo = new
Foo();var_dump(spl_object_hash($foo));$foo-bar =
1;var_dump(spl_object_hash($foo));
string(32)
As someone that has long clamoured for namespaces in PHP, I have to say
that this proposal by Dmitry is exactly what I others have been hoping
for in PHP. Thanks, Dmitry, for creating this patch. I'm sure there
are going to be some peculiarities that need to be sorted out, but I
can't wait
On 7/14/07, Rasmus Lerdorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tijnema wrote:
On 7/14/07, Stanislav Malyshev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Apache2handler SAPI should be loaded first, and read the very
first line of the PHP script to determine if a version is specified
there. If not, the handler needs
39 matches
Mail list logo
