From: Stanislav Malyshev [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Looks like design flaw to me - why not index symbols by name,
you can't
have interface and class with the same name?
Right. I was wrong and I have suppressed the 'interface' type in the PHK
autoloader.
If we ever extend autoloader to
On 13 Sep 2007, at 1:04 AM, David Coallier wrote:
On 9/12/07, Stanislav Malyshev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Would anyone object to disallowing setting
mail.force_extra_parameters
from .htaccess? The problem is that mail.force_extra_parameters
can pass
arbitrary arguments to mail tool, and
Hello all,
Since this is the first time I am posting to this list, let me first
introduce myself. I am Dietrich Moerman, a computer science student from
Belgium (that's the small country known for its chocolates ;)). In my
free time, I develop the UseBB forum package. Version 1, written in
On Sep 12, 2007, at 2:25 PM, Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
Andrew Shearer wrote:
Meanwhile, array_get() provides the most-needed functionality
while avoiding
the issues that prevented ifsetor's acceptance.
Aside from lack of BC hacks what is the issue? I remember some
fussing about the name,
Hi,
On Wed, 12 Sep 2007 20:25:39 +0200, in php.internals
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lukas Kahwe Smith) wrote:
Aside from lack of BC hacks what is the issue? I remember some fussing
about the name, but I find this a joke of an argument. You cant get much
clearer a name than ifsetor().
just my opinion
On 9/13/07, Peter Brodersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not too fond of a function that begins with if* - it might
misdirect people to think it's a control structure.
ifsetor was not a function (like isset).
--Pierre
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe,
Hello Andrew,
if we go the array_get() route as a short half solution to hopefully make
a lot of people happy (at least it would serve $_GET/_REQUEST etc needs).
Then I think we should make it a bit more useable:
Get the default or the multilevel subscription of $ar
proto mixed array_get(array
Are you sure we would need to create a new hook ? If the existing
autoload handlers receive a request for a function, they search for a
class with that name. Apart from a waste of time, it is harmless. We
can even have BC : you just have to declare your autoload handler
with an optional second
now i get the issue. It grabbs more than one line! This means
run-tests.php has to be fixed. The whole thing is designed under
the assumption that %s catches no new lines and hence only one
line.
That would be the best answer but I think it's a difficult fix and
whatever it was might break
Translating the documentation
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Hi Nuno,
On Thu, 2007-09-13 at 20:20 +0100, Nuno Lopes wrote:
now i get the issue. It grabbs more than one line! This means
run-tests.php has to be fixed. The whole thing is designed under
the assumption that %s catches no new lines and hence only one
line.
That would be the best
11 matches
Mail list logo
