I guess I should say it before anyone else does...
"It's not the PHP way"
- Timothy Chandler
Simple Site Solutions
Felipe Pena wrote:
Hello ladies and gentlemen,
I made a patch that implements an experimental return type hint,
therefore we need discuss much about this yet, right? :)
My idea
Mike Lively wrote:
Maintenance on runkit/classkit. I've talked with pollita and she seems happy
about it ;)
I'm working on a project that would benefit from runkit, so this would
be lovely. There was a bug that was giving me grief, previously. If I
remember what it was, I'll let you know
Maintenance on runkit/classkit. I've talked with pollita and she seems happy
about it ;)
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On Sun, Apr 6, 2008 at 8:41 PM, Felipe Pena <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> - PHP types
>
> function (string) foo(...) { } // Unicode string too
> function (object) foo(...) { } // Strict
> function (array) foo(...) { } // Strict
> function (bool) foo(...) { } // Strict
> function(int) foo(...
Felipe Pena escribió:
Hello ladies and gentlemen,
I made a patch that implements an experimental return type hint,
therefore we need discuss much about this yet, right? :)
Thanks for raising this issue !!
function(int) foo(...) { } // Accepts numeric string
function (double) foo(...) {
Hello ladies and gentlemen,
I made a patch that implements an experimental return type hint,
therefore we need discuss much about this yet, right? :)
My idea uses (php-type) and +className as notation, see below.
- PHP types
function (string) foo(...) { } // Unicode string too
function (object)
Hi!
What about
a) an "ICU" prefix?
I don't think it's better than intl_, having disadvantage of referring
to particular library rather than function (like glibc_file_get_contents
instead of file_get_contents).
b) daring the leap and use namespaces, making it 5.3+ only (I know, that
wasn't
Heya,
while building and testing a minimal version of PHP and as such
disabling the session extension, I discovered that
ext/standard/tests/general_functions/bug44394_2.phpt fails without the
session extension being enabled. I created a patch to fix that [1].
On a sidenote, some tests seem t
Lester Caine wrote:
I KEEP asking what is holding up making a beta release of PHP6, and I
see nothing in the 2005 meeting that is anything more than a restructure
and recompile using unicode as the base. MOST of the other things are
just removing things that are now normally switched off anyway
I have created a few tests for the patch and updated to the patch to the tip
of both php6 and php5.3
http://ds-o.com/Patches/lsb.forward_static_call.v3.tar.gz
A link to just the patch:
http://ds-o.com/Patches/lsb.forward_static_call.v3.patch
It would be fantastic to get it reviewed and commit
The patch didn't apply cleanly against current PHP_5_3. Therefore I
attached an adapted version.
Sorry, attachment missing: http://www.jreich.com/php/name_resolution.patch
Regards,
Julian Reich
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/u
Hi Jessie,
Regarding the name resolution rules, I posted a patch a few months
ago with what I think is a more reasonable lookup order (http://news.php.net/php.internals/34097
), but did not get much feedback. Would you like to try it out? (let
me know if it doesn't apply cleanly against the
Hi,
This is a clear bug, please report it at bugs.php.net
Done: http://bugs.php.net/44653
Since "use SomeName" does the same as "use ::SomeName" dropping the
warning also be an option.
And if we split of "use" into "use namespace" and "use class" we could
resolve ambiguous calls where
a
i'm having trouble with the bug http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=44654 i
just reported. i'm not sure if it's a expected behavoir or a bug
introduced by re2c or whatever patch.
On Sun, Apr 6, 2008 at 10:19 PM, PHP Bug Database
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: xuefer at gmail dot com
>
Julian Reich wrote:
Hi,
I recently started porting an application to PHP 5.3.
1. While testing the new namespace implementation I noticed the following:
Executing the code above results in a warning: "The use statement with
non-compound name 'Test1' has no effect in [...]".
I understand the r
15 matches
Mail list logo
