On Mon, 14 Jan 2013, Christopher Jones wrote:
On 01/14/2013 05:16 PM, Dennis Clarke wrote:
This is a bug I think. I recently saw that PHP had been updated
to 5.4.10 and I decided to update my php bits in /usr/local. I was
quite surprised to see in the configure output this
On 1/14/13 9:53 PM, Paulo Henrique Torrens wrote:
lots of code where people put it there, and I always get a little frustrated
when using
PHP because I'm used on adding it (without even noticing), and my code keeps
failing
Pay more attention and/or use an IDE that has templates and shows
Unless you are hacking PHP you can ignore Bison. Check the Makefile
Well, the configure output claims that something is wrong, therefore the build
can not be trusted.
I'm just following the defacto way to build PHP and if the configure output
claims
something is wrong .. then it is
Of course, if 2.6.5 is verified than it should be added to
bison_version_list in Zend/acinclude.m4. Feel free to regenerate the
parsers with it, review the test suite results, and create a github
pull request.
Anything outside of release tarball won't be supported here. Sorry.
However ...
On Mon, 14 Jan 2013 22:55:33 +0100, Gustavo Lopes glo...@nebm.ist.utl.pt
wrote:
OK, so now the plan is to merge this onto 5.4:
https://github.com/cataphract/php-src/compare/php:PHP-5.4...cataphract:strtr_wu94_54
And this to 5.5:
/** For the sake of getting this issue looked into I am going to cross
post
* to two maillists. Maybe the PHP folks see the issue and will reply with an
* update. Who knows.
*/
Original message to the bison mailist :
Le 15 janv. 2013 à 00:19, Dennis Clarke dcla...@blastwave.org
On 01/15/2013 05:03 PM, Dennis Clarke wrote:
Really I would like to hear from the PHP folks on this as it seems as if PHP
is
quite fragile or perhaps simply mysterious.
I don't think any of us test on Solaris regularly, so you can expect the
odd test to fail, but in general it should build
On 01/15/2013 05:03 PM, Dennis Clarke wrote:
Really I would like to hear from the PHP folks on this as it seems
as if PHP is
quite fragile or perhaps simply mysterious.
I don't think any of us test on Solaris regularly, so you can expect the
odd test to fail, but in general it
On 01/15/2013 05:19 PM, Dennis Clarke wrote:
I agree that Oracle has done the Solaris market no favours and were the
result of the death of OpenSolaris however, having said all that, Solaris
is a SUSv3 compliant commercial UNIX and thus one would think that
open source code written to comply
On 16/01/13 08:22, Thomas Bley wrote:
Hello,
I created a small ticket to propose a shorter syntax for htmlspecialchars:
old:
?= htmlspecialchars($str, ENT_QUOTES) ?
new:
?+ $str ?
or:
?~ $str ?
any comments, pros and cons?
https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=62574
Best regards,
Thomas
The
Those old Solaris servers are still out there churning away.
Sure, but there are very few of you and we have limited resources.
granted ... I get it. I do. I ran Blastwave for a decade on shoestring and
prayer and kicked out several thousand SVR4 packages. I really do get it.
We
focus
We
focus those resources on the platforms used by 95% of our users. Feel
free to dig in and send us some patches. Needless to say, all of those
tests pass on Linux, FreeBSD and likely OSX as well.
I will try that theory out on RHEL 6.3 and let you know.
PHP is hardly what I would call
On Tue, 2013-01-15 at 17:19 -0500, Dennis Clarke wrote:
I agree that Oracle has done the Solaris market no favours and were the
result of the death of OpenSolaris however, having said all that, Solaris
is a SUSv3 compliant commercial UNIX and thus one would think that
open source code written
Hi!
As for the odd test failing, I see this :
That looks like a lot of failures in most basic scripts. I suspect
there's some unifying problem to that - what are the .diff files for
some of these failures, is there anything interesting in the PHP error log?
--
Stanislav Malyshev, Software
We
focus those resources on the platforms used by 95% of our users. Feel
free to dig in and send us some patches. Needless to say, all of those
tests pass on Linux, FreeBSD and likely OSX as well.
I will try that theory out on RHEL 6.3 and let you know.
PHP is hardly what I
Please mind that PHP is developed mostly on a volunteer basis and the
work is focused on primarily used platforms. If you want to provide
productive help we'd love having people going through those and provide
fixes for overly specific tests and identifying broken PHP features.
I have a slew
Hi!
As for the odd test failing, I see this :
That looks like a lot of failures in most basic scripts. I suspect
there's some unifying problem to that - what are the .diff files for
some of these failures, is there anything interesting in the PHP error
log?
I will try to wade
Hi!
I will try to wade through the logs tomorrow. At the moment I am doing
the same process on RHEL and seeing a bucket of failures also.
RHEL shouldn't have failures in core, though some extension tests may
fail (unfortunately, error messages change or library versions change
can trip up
Hi!
Hello,
I created a small ticket to propose a shorter syntax for htmlspecialchars:
old:
?= htmlspecialchars($str, ENT_QUOTES) ?
Don't think operator can make sense here, since you can have different
options, etc. depending on context. But you could do this if the above
is too long for
On 01/15/2013 09:07 PM, Dennis Clarke wrote:
Number of tests : 12276 8329
Tests skipped : 3947 ( 32.2%)
Tests warned:0 ( 0.0%) ( 0.0%)
Tests failed:2 ( 0.0%) ( 0.0%)
Expected fail : 36 ( 0.3%) ( 0.4%)
Tests passed: 8291 ( 67.5%) ( 99.5%)
On 01/15/2013 06:18 PM, Stas Malyshev wrote:
Hi!
I will try to wade through the logs tomorrow. At the moment I am doing
the same process on RHEL and seeing a bucket of failures also.
This URL has some potential to help, since it will show common failures
other people are seeing:
On 01/15/2013 12:09 PM, Dennis Clarke wrote:
Of course, if 2.6.5 is verified than it should be added to
bison_version_list in Zend/acinclude.m4. Feel free to regenerate the
parsers with it, review the test suite results, and create a github
pull request.
Anything outside of release
22 matches
Mail list logo
