Hi!
> I would like to propose a few changes to our heredoc / nowdoc scanner to make
> it less awkward to use inside other constructs.
>
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/heredoc-scanner-loosening
>
> Let me know your thoughts :)
With this proposal, you will not be able to use the delimiter inside the
Hi internals,
I would like to propose a few changes to our heredoc / nowdoc scanner to make
it less awkward to use inside other constructs.
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/heredoc-scanner-loosening
Let me know your thoughts :)
Best,
Tjerk (@datibbaw)
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mail
On Fri, August 29, 2014 18:34, Xinchen Hui wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 11:49 PM, Anatol Belski
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>> while refining the big string support, it turned out that we've an
>> issue. The syntax like $s[42] = 'x'; is currently inconsistend, because
>> we have uint32 for string
On Fri, August 29, 2014 19:41, Andrea Faulds wrote:
>
> On 29 Aug 2014, at 17:39, Anatol Belski wrote:
>
>
>> On Fri, August 29, 2014 17:54, Andrea Faulds wrote:
>>
>>
>>> I’d just leave things as they are… though I suppose there might be
>>> some benefit to switching to size_t for string offsets
On 29 Aug 2014, at 17:39, Anatol Belski wrote:
> On Fri, August 29, 2014 17:54, Andrea Faulds wrote:
>
>> I’d just leave things as they are… though I suppose there might be some
>> benefit to switching to size_t for string offsets. Does that avoid a cast
>> in the generated assembly?
> My point
On Fri, August 29, 2014 17:54, Andrea Faulds wrote:
>
> On 29 Aug 2014, at 16:49, Anatol Belski wrote:
>
>
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>> while refining the big string support, it turned out that we've an
> issue.
>> The syntax like $s[42] = 'x'; is currently inconsistend, because we
>> have uint32 for string o
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 11:49 PM, Anatol Belski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> while refining the big string support, it turned out that we've an issue.
> The syntax like $s[42] = 'x'; is currently inconsistend, because we have
> uint32 for string offsets. This actually means, the behaviour is currently
> only
On 29 Aug 2014, at 16:49, Anatol Belski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> while refining the big string support, it turned out that we've an issue.
> The syntax like $s[42] = 'x'; is currently inconsistend, because we have
> uint32 for string offsets. This actually means, the behaviour is currently
> only avail
Hi,
while refining the big string support, it turned out that we've an issue.
The syntax like $s[42] = 'x'; is currently inconsistend, because we have
uint32 for string offsets. This actually means, the behaviour is currently
only available in the old style and can handle not more than 2gb big
str
Hi Stas, all!
- Original Message -
From: "Stas Malyshev"
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2014
Hi!
5.6.0 has been released, and first thing I'd like to congratulate all
who participated in it with this great milestone.
Second thing, that means 5.4.33 would be the last release including
non-
On Friday 29 August 2014 11:59:50 Ferenc Kovacs
wrote:
> in the meantime, could you please report a bug about
this, so that we won't
> forget it (and there is a chance that somebody else
can also help figuring
> out what's happening here).
https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=67931
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 11:36 AM, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
>
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 11:28 AM, Patrick Schaaf wrote:
>
>> On Friday 29 August 2014 10:57:57 Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
>>
>> > > Apart from that: the link for "Variadic functions" (second bullet in
>> the
>> > > main features announcem
On Aug 29, 2014 11:32 AM, "Derick Rethans" wrote:
>
> On Thu, 28 Aug 2014, Julien Pauli wrote:
>
> > I already sent a mail, few months ago, to clean the branches we dont
> > use any more. Some argued that for history, they should be kept
> > referenced.
>
> As they are so light weight, there is no
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 8:54 AM, Andrey Andreev wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 3:03 AM, Johannes Schlüter
> wrote:
>> On Fri, 2014-08-29 at 00:12 +0100, Andrea Faulds wrote:
>>> I don’t see the need, though. For cases where we added stuff after release,
>>> just make an extra tag.
>>
>> $ git
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 11:28 AM, Patrick Schaaf wrote:
> On Friday 29 August 2014 10:57:57 Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
>
> > > Apart from that: the link for "Variadic functions" (second bullet in
> the
> > > main features announcement),leads to manual lookup because
> > > "function.arguments.php does
On Thu, 28 Aug 2014, Julien Pauli wrote:
> I already sent a mail, few months ago, to clean the branches we dont
> use any more. Some argued that for history, they should be kept
> referenced.
As they are so light weight, there is no reason to remove them. Please
keep them. I still occasionally
On Friday 29 August 2014 10:57:57 Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
> > Apart from that: the link for "Variadic functions" (second bullet in the
> > main features announcement),leads to manual lookup because
> > "function.arguments.php doesn't exist"
> >
> > http://php.net/functions.arguments.php#functions
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 10:20 AM, Patrick Schaaf wrote:
> Hi,
>
> just noticed that the PHP 5.6 related links on the php.net frontpage of
> mirrors, all point back to http://php.net/ instead of pointing to the
> respective mirror. Is that intentional?
>
we just followed suit with previous announ
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 4:07 PM, Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
> Am 28.08.2014 um 10:04 schrieb Pierre Joye:
>> ext/hash can have it anyway. I did not look at it if it makes sense to
>> use it in other parts.
>
> Sorry for not bein more clear: yes, I was thinking about adding it to
> ext/hash, of co
Hi,
just noticed that the PHP 5.6 related links on the php.net frontpage of
mirrors, all point back to http://php.net/ instead of pointing to the
respective mirror. Is that intentional?
Apart from that: the link for "Variadic functions" (second bullet in the
main features announcement),leads t
The translations for other langages are currently misleading as well,
since it still mentions PHP5.6 is under development.
e.g. :
http://php.net/manual/fr/migration56.php
http://php.net/manual/de/migration56.php
...
Thanks,
Jocelyn
Le 29/08/2014 02:43, Alain Williams a écrit :
I notice t
21 matches
Mail list logo
