Hi,
I work for the rare company that uses Linux PHP servers with MSSQL. We rely
quite a bit on this extension and have invested a little in some feature
improvements. I'd like to get them pushed upstream, but given the
relatively low usage of this extension, it seems like PRs easily get stuck
in
Results for project PHP master, build date 2016-02-05 06:29:31+02:00
commit: 7a225d1
previous commit:fd6f32f
revision date: 2016-02-05 01:13:19+02:00
environment:Haswell-EP
cpu:Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2699 v3 @ 2.30GHz 2x18 cores,
stepping 2, LLC 45 MB
Hi,
I'm using Ondřej Surý's ppa which was recently upgraded to PHP 7.0.3. My
test-suite is causing segmentation faults since 7.0.0 RC5, including the
7.0.3 release.
I can reproduce this consistently by running my test-suite in PHPUnit.
Identifying the tests executing when the fault occurs (using
As an aside, having this kind of #ifdef type stuff also allows us to write
forward compatible scripts without worrying about invalid syntax breaking
older versions.
On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 11:20 AM, Pierre Joye wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 2:00 AM, Davey Shafik
On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 7:37 PM, Simon Svensson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm using Ondřej Surý's ppa which was recently upgraded to PHP 7.0.3. My
> test-suite is causing segmentation faults since 7.0.0 RC5, including the
> 7.0.3 release.
>
> I can reproduce this consistently by running
On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 2:00 AM, Davey Shafik wrote:
> On Wednesday, February 3, 2016, Sara Golemon wrote:
>
>> > I think Dan raises some interesting points, although I think
>> zend_version()
>> > is often used for feature detection so they try to put a zend
On 05/02/16 19:57, julien PAULI wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 7:37 PM, Simon Svensson wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm using Ondřej Surý's ppa which was recently upgraded to PHP 7.0.3. My
>> test-suite is causing segmentation faults since 7.0.0 RC5, including the
>> 7.0.3 release.
>>
On 02/05/2016 11:39 AM, Simon Svensson wrote:
> I am unable to reproduce the error with this recompiled source, both
> with the /usr/local/php70/bin/php and /usr/local/php70-debug/bin/php.
> This is the same experience I had with earlier releases, where I have
> been unable to reproduce the
On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 8:20 AM, Pierre Joye wrote:
>> I do however like the idea of feature detection - I wonder if perhaps we
>> could do something where it's done at compile time and therefore minimally
>> impacts runtime?
>
> This could be what you actually need. A #ifdef
Hi again,
Andrea Faulds wrote:
There is one unresolved issue with the current patch that the RFC
doesn't address, so I'll ask about it here.
As part of supporting exponent notation in all remaining integer
operations (casts, operators), I would like to have intval() support it,
to match the
> On 05 02 2016, at 11:49, Andrea Faulds wrote:
>
> Hi again,
>
> Andrea Faulds wrote:
>> There is one unresolved issue with the current patch that the RFC
>> doesn't address, so I'll ask about it here.
>>
>> As part of supporting exponent notation in all remaining integer
>>
Hi everyone,
It's been more than two weeks since I first proposed this RFC, and
there's no outstanding issues preventing moving towards a vote. There's
not yet a language specification patch, but that can be done later.
So, I'm opening the vote on this RFC today, 2016-02-05, and it'll close
Hi Mike,
Michael Wallner wrote:
To be honest, I had not even memorised intval() supports a base, but that we
have base_convert().
I’d opt for dropping base convert support from intval(), but that’s obviously
not possible, because PHP-7.1 is the target for this RFC.
Yeah, it's easy to
On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 5:55 AM, Andrea Faulds wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> It's been more than two weeks since I first proposed this RFC, and there's
> no outstanding issues preventing moving towards a vote. There's not yet a
> language specification patch, but that can be done later.
>
Hi,
2016-02-05 23:58 GMT-04:00 Levi Morrison :
> On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 5:55 AM, Andrea Faulds wrote:
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> It's been more than two weeks since I first proposed this RFC, and there's
>> no outstanding issues preventing moving towards a vote. There's
On Feb 6, 2016 3:02 AM, "Sara Golemon" wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 8:20 AM, Pierre Joye wrote:
> >> I do however like the idea of feature detection - I wonder if perhaps
we
> >> could do something where it's done at compile time and therefore
16 matches
Mail list logo