Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] [VOTE] Transform exit() from a language construct into a standard function

2024-08-13 Thread Matthew Sewell
> On 13 Aug 2024, at 13:43, Gina P. Banyard wrote: > > On Tuesday, 13 August 2024 at 14:05, Matthew Sewell wrote: > >>> On 13 Aug 2024, at 12:36, Gina P. Banyard intern...@gpb.moe wrote: >>> >>> On Tuesday, 30 July 2024 at 11:49, Gina P. Banyard i

Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] [VOTE] Transform exit() from a language construct into a standard function

2024-08-13 Thread Matthew Sewell
> On 13 Aug 2024, at 12:36, Gina P. Banyard wrote: > > On Tuesday, 30 July 2024 at 11:49, Gina P. Banyard wrote: > >> Hello Internals, >> >> I have just opened the vote for the "Transform exit() from a language >> construct into a standard function" RFC: >> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/exit-as

Re: [PHP-DEV] RE: Testing new list server

2024-02-18 Thread Matthew Sewell
Hi, I'm using Gmail too but with a custom domain. I did get those three messages but significantly delayed from when they were on externals. Best wishes, Matt On Sat, Feb 17, 2024 at 4:15 PM tag Knife wrote: > > On Fri, 16 Feb 2024 at 23:50, Jorg Sowa wrote: > >> Hello Derick, >> there is so

Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] [Discussion] Deprecate functions with overloaded signatures

2023-05-15 Thread Matthew Sewell
> On 15 May 2023, at 19:51, Rowan Tommins wrote: > > On 15 May 2023 19:38:56 BST, Larry Garfield wrote: > >> I agree entirely. Setting reasonable expectations for users to plan around, >> such as a known 5-years-per-major cycle, helps end users far more than >> "whelp, we did something big

Re: [PHP-DEV] Improving Mailing-List interactions - was: [PHP-DEV] Moving PHP internals to GitHub

2023-04-13 Thread Matthew Sewell
> On 13 Apr 2023, at 09:29, Andreas Heigl wrote: > > Hey all > > On 12.04.23 22:44, Larry Garfield wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 12, 2023, at 6:42 PM, Rowan Tommins wrote: >>> Which brings me back to my earlier point: I wonder how much of the >>> reaction is really about e-mail itself, and how much i

Re: [PHP-DEV] Future stability of PHP?

2023-04-11 Thread Matthew Sewell
idea (I have a separate problem in that our projects are rarely on GitHub or GitLab) but does anybody who would actually benefit from it have any thoughts on whether it would be good for them or not? > On 11 Apr 2023, at 10:09, Matthew Sewell wrote: > > What's meaningful in this

Re: [PHP-DEV] Future stability of PHP?

2023-04-11 Thread Matthew Sewell
What's meaningful in this sense? I have a budget for supporting open source projects (back to my money v time point) and a percentage of that is for the PHP Foundation. I'd happily pay LTS fees we pay elsewhere (even sometimes as a safety net) to the Foundation but believe that the money we giv

Re: [PHP-DEV] Future stability of PHP?

2023-04-10 Thread Matthew Sewell
Hi, This is a really interesting thread and am glad that Stephan raised it as I've been thinking along similar lines for a while now and am glad I'm not the only one. Considering the range of people adding comments (especially someone like Mark) then I would hope everyone agrees that this dese