Hi all,
I'm actually putting my head into ext/mysqlnd and I noticed weird
things about its API.
As you should know, ext/mysqlnd is a replacement for libmysql, that
is, all our 3 MySQL-related extensions may use it, and it is done by
default for 5.4 branch.
However, I've been surprised that
On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 13:35 +0200, jpauli wrote:
- mysqli_get_client_stats()
- mysqli_get_connection_stats()
- mysqli_get_cache_stats()
Those three functions are ext/mysqlnd related, they are #ifdef 'ed in
the source code of ext/mysqli and not defined if ext/mysqli has been
compiled
2012/4/24 Johannes Schlüter johannes.schlue...@oracle.com:
On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 13:35 +0200, jpauli wrote:
- mysqli_get_client_stats()
- mysqli_get_connection_stats()
- mysqli_get_cache_stats()
Those three functions are ext/mysqlnd related, they are #ifdef 'ed in
the source code of
Am 24.04.2012 14:27, schrieb jpauli:
I understand your thoughts, but I disagree as I think it would be much
more clean to expose it via mysqlnd_***() API than through each MySQL
ext (and for PDO that would be even more dirty). That would as well
add more and more #ifdef MYSQLND inside their
On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 14:27 +0200, jpauli wrote:
Aha, I like when an internals guy teach me internals stuff :)
So, OK for 5.3 , what about supporting that for =5.4 ?
Maybe. ;-)
The other reason is that one idea for mysqlnd was that it doesn't expose
anything to the userland while
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 2:34 PM, Ulf Wendel ulf.wen...@oracle.com wrote:
Am 24.04.2012 14:27, schrieb jpauli:
I understand your thoughts, but I disagree as I think it would be much
more clean to expose it via mysqlnd_***() API than through each MySQL
ext (and for PDO that would be even more
2012/4/24 Johannes Schlüter johannes.schlue...@oracle.com:
On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 14:27 +0200, jpauli wrote:
Aha, I like when an internals guy teach me internals stuff :)
So, OK for 5.3 , what about supporting that for =5.4 ?
Maybe. ;-)
I can start working on ideas/patches
The other
Hi,
On 04/24/2012 03:32 PM, jpauli wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 2:34 PM, Ulf Wendelulf.wen...@oracle.com wrote:
Am 24.04.2012 14:27, schrieb jpauli:
I understand your thoughts, but I disagree as I think it would be much
more clean to expose it via mysqlnd_***() API than through each MySQL
