On Wed, 10 Jul 2024, Tim Düsterhus wrote:
> On 7/10/24 16:18, Derick Rethans wrote:
> > Comments?
>
> For now I'm only asking to give me the time to go through the
> ext/random stuff myself before the automated deletion is performed
> (i.e. defer this until after feature freeze at least).
That
On Wed, 10 Jul 2024, Gina P. Banyard wrote:
> On Wednesday, 10 July 2024 at 15:18, Derick Rethans wrote:
>
> > We discussed this during one of our foundation meetings, and we propose:
> >
> > - to delete all notes with a rating less than -5 that are older than a
> > year.
> > - come up with a p
On 10.07.2024 at 21:24, Bilge wrote:
> On 10/07/2024 19:42, Derick Rethans wrote:
>
>> Notes where never meant to be helpful to other developers. They were
>> hints to the editors
>
> If that's the case, why would they even be public?
Actually, there are guidelines regarding the handling of user
On Wed, Jul 10, 2024, at 12:24 PM, Bilge wrote:
> On 10/07/2024 19:42, Derick Rethans wrote:
>> Notes where never meant to be helpful to other developers. They were hints
>> to the editors
> If that's the case, why would they even be public?
>
I think Derick is over-stating things a bit. As I me
On 10/07/2024 19:42, Derick Rethans wrote:
Notes where never meant to be helpful to other developers. They were hints to
the editors
If that's the case, why would they even be public?
Cheers,
Bilge
On 10 July 2024 18:47:07 BST, fennic log wrote:
>On Wed, 10 Jul 2024 at 15:18, Derick Rethans wrote:
>
>> Hi!
>>
>> There are currently nearly 2 notes in the documentation, with many
>> having a very high negative rating.
>>
>> For example, there are:
>>
>> 1131 notes older than a year, with
On Wed, Jul 10, 2024, at 7:18 AM, Derick Rethans wrote:
> We discussed this during one of our foundation meetings, and we propose:
>
> - to delete all notes with a rating less than -5 that are older than a
> year.
> - come up with a plan to crowd source going through the other thousands
> of
Hi
On 7/10/24 16:18, Derick Rethans wrote:
Comments?
For now I'm only asking to give me the time to go through the ext/random
stuff myself before the automated deletion is performed (i.e. defer this
until after feature freeze at least).
Similarly to what Fennic Log replied, for ext/random
On Wed, 10 Jul 2024 at 15:18, Derick Rethans wrote:
> Hi!
>
> There are currently nearly 2 notes in the documentation, with many
> having a very high negative rating.
>
> For example, there are:
>
> 1131 notes older than a year, with a rating less than -10
> 2339 notes older than a year, with
On Wednesday, 10 July 2024 at 15:18, Derick Rethans wrote:
> Hi!
>
> There are currently nearly 2 notes in the documentation, with many
> having a very high negative rating.
>
> For example, there are:
>
> 1131 notes older than a year, with a rating less than -10
> 2339 notes older than a
Hi!
There are currently nearly 2 notes in the documentation, with many
having a very high negative rating.
For example, there are:
1131 notes older than a year, with a rating less than -10
2339 notes older than a year, with a rating less than -5
5761 notes older than a year, with a rating l
11 matches
Mail list logo
