On 30.01.2006 22:04, Jeff Moore wrote:
On Jan 30, 2006, at 1:33 PM, Johannes Schlueter wrote:
"SplObjectStorage" is some thing which stores objects, that can be
read out of
the name so it at least gives an idea and compared to your
"SplUniqueObjectContainer" it's quite short.
There are many
On Jan 30, 2006, at 1:33 PM, Johannes Schlueter wrote:
"SplObjectStorage" is some thing which stores objects, that can be
read out of
the name so it at least gives an idea and compared to your
"SplUniqueObjectContainer" it's quite short.
There are many ways to store objects. Arrays can stor
Hi Jeff,
On Monday 30 January 2006 19:11, Jeff Moore wrote:
> > Why not just call it Betty.
>
> Why not? "Betty" is only slightly more vague than "Storage." A vague
> name is nobody's friend.
"SplObjectStorage" is some thing which stores objects, that can be read out of
the name so it at least
On Jan 28, 2006, at 4:08 PM, Kevin Waterson wrote:
To give SplObjectStorage a better name. My best suggestion is
SplUniqueObjectContainer. There may be a better choice.
Why not just call it Betty.
Why not? "Betty" is only slightly more vague than "Storage." A vague
name is nobody's fri
Kevin Waterson wrote:
This one time, at band camp, Jeff Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
To give SplObjectStorage a better name. My best suggestion is
SplUniqueObjectContainer. There may be a better choice.
Why not just call it Betty.
Kevin
+1 for Betty!
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtim
This one time, at band camp, Jeff Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> To give SplObjectStorage a better name. My best suggestion is
> SplUniqueObjectContainer. There may be a better choice.
Why not just call it Betty.
Kevin
--
"Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for
On Jan 27, 2006, at 10:26 PM, Marcus Boerger wrote:
what the hell do you want?
To give SplObjectStorage a better name. My best suggestion is
SplUniqueObjectContainer. There may be a better choice.
Best Regards,
Jeff
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscrib
Hello Jeff,
what the hell do you want?
Friday, January 27, 2006, 8:23:26 PM, you wrote:
> Hi, Marcus,
> On Jan 27, 2006, at 1:10 PM, Marcus Boerger wrote:
>> yes, it is a conainer and not a set.
> So why not call it a container instead of storage?
>> And it cannot take anything other
>> t
Hi, Marcus,
On Jan 27, 2006, at 1:10 PM, Marcus Boerger wrote:
yes, it is a conainer and not a set.
So why not call it a container instead of storage?
And it cannot take anything other
than php objects. That's why.
SplObjectContainer?
But, then, it has that uniqueness constraint. The
Hello Jeff,
yes, it is a conainer and not a set. And it cannot take anything other
than php objects. That's why.
Friday, January 27, 2006, 5:37:09 PM, you wrote:
> SplObjectStorage:
> "This container allows to store objects uniquly without the need to
> compare them one by one."
> Unless I'
SplObjectStorage:
"This container allows to store objects uniquly without the need to
compare them one by one."
Unless I'm mistaken, in Java and Mathematics, this is called a Set.
"A collection that contains no duplicate elements."
Is there some reason not to name the class for the general
11 matches
Mail list logo
