hi Philip,
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 9:55 PM, Philip Olson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello everyone-
>
> PHP 5.3 is approaching fast, so let's conclude our dealings with magical
> quotes... this should be the last time. Please have a look at the following
> RFC and discuss it within this thread.
On 20 May 2008, at 13:53, Pierre Joye wrote:
hi Philip,
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 9:55 PM, Philip Olson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Hello everyone-
PHP 5.3 is approaching fast, so let's conclude our dealings with
magical
quotes... this should be the last time. Please have a look at the
fo
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 11:00 PM, Philip Olson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 20 May 2008, at 13:53, Pierre Joye wrote:
>
>> hi Philip,
>>
>> On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 9:55 PM, Philip Olson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello everyone-
>>>
>>> PHP 5.3 is approaching fast, so let's conclude ou
Philip Olson wrote:
PHP 5.3 is approaching fast, so let's conclude our dealings with magical
quotes... this should be the last time. Please have a look at the
following
RFC and discuss it within this thread.
Magic Quotes in PHP 5.3 and beyond
- http://wiki.php.net/rfc/magicquotes
It recommend
+1 here
A summary:
PHP6 MUST not allow setting magic quotes
PHP6 MUST trigger a fatal error when attempting to set magic quotes (php.ini
or set_magic_quotes_runtime())
PHP6 MUST allow getting magic quotes info (always false)
PHP5.3 MUST allow setting magic quotes
PHP5.3 MUST trigger an E_DEPREC
2008/5/20 Jonathan Bond-Caron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> +1 here
>
> A summary:
>
> PHP6 MUST not allow setting magic quotes
> PHP6 MUST trigger a fatal error when attempting to set magic quotes (php.ini
> or set_magic_quotes_runtime())
> PHP6 MUST allow getting magic quotes info (always false)
>
> PHP
[ forgot to sent that to the list ]
Hi Philip,
Am Dienstag, den 20.05.2008, 12:55 -0700 schrieb Philip Olson:
[...]
> PHP 5.3 is approaching fast, so let's conclude our dealings with
> magical quotes... this should be the last time. Please have a look at
> the following RFC and discuss it wit
> cu, Lars
> P.S.: Silence agrees doesn't work, silence is void.
Well, if silence is void: TAKE IT OFF!!! (+1 ... once again on this subject)
--
Slan,
David
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Hi David,
Am Donnerstag, den 22.05.2008, 18:14 -0400 schrieb David Coallier:
> > cu, Lars
> > P.S.: Silence agrees doesn't work, silence is void.
>
> Well, if silence is void: TAKE IT OFF!!! (+1 ... once again on this #subject)
You've spotted that the proposal is not about the question if they
s
Lars Strojny wrote:
[ forgot to sent that to the list ]
Hi Philip,
Am Dienstag, den 20.05.2008, 12:55 -0700 schrieb Philip Olson:
[...]
PHP 5.3 is approaching fast, so let's conclude our dealings with
magical quotes... this should be the last time. Please have a look at
the following RFC an
PHP 5.3 is approaching fast, so let's conclude our dealings with
magical quotes... this should be the last time. Please have a look at
the following RFC and discuss it within this thread.
Magic Quotes in PHP 5.3 and beyond
- http://wiki.php.net/rfc/magicquotes
It recommends changes to both
Hi Rasmus,
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 1:35 AM, Rasmus Lerdorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Lars Strojny wrote:
>>
>> [ forgot to sent that to the list ]
>>
>> Hi Philip,
>>
>> Am Dienstag, den 20.05.2008, 12:55 -0700 schrieb Philip Olson:
>> [...]
>>>
>>> PHP 5.3 is approaching fast, so let's conclud
Hi,
Just making sure I understood it well. Get isn't deprecated (good), set is
(good), but what happens if I try to set magic quotes runtime *off* if it
was *on* from the config.
I couldn't see anything about the PHP config setting being ignored/removed
or throwing error in the RFC.
For c
+1 for this. Just clean the code once and for all.
2008/5/23 Lars Strojny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> [ forgot to sent that to the list ]
>
> Hi Philip,
>
> Am Dienstag, den 20.05.2008, 12:55 -0700 schrieb Philip Olson:
> [...]
> > PHP 5.3 is approaching fast, so let's conclude our dealings with
> > m
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 12:09 AM, Lars Strojny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why should we leave get_magic_quotes_gpc()? If someone wants to be
> backwards compatible, just use
Excuse me? The users should change their code to be forward compatible?
We should ofcourse make it easier for our users and
We have covered this a bunch of times already. magic_quotes_gpc
are gone,
but we leave in the function that tells userspace code that they
are off.
get_magic_quotes_gpc() will always return false which means that
thousands
of applications out there will run unchanged and will simply take th
Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
> I see absolutely no reason to force people to go through and change:
>
> if(!get_magic_quotes_gpc())
>
> to:
>
> if (!function_exists('get_magic_quotes_gpc') || !get_magic_quotes_gpc())
>
> when there is no technical reason to force them to do so. It is slower,
> more v
Gregory Beaver wrote:
Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
I see absolutely no reason to force people to go through and change:
if(!get_magic_quotes_gpc())
to:
if (!function_exists('get_magic_quotes_gpc') || !get_magic_quotes_gpc())
when there is no technical reason to force them to do so. It is slower,
m
On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 4:03 AM, Rasmus Lerdorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Right, I guess I wasn't absolutely explicit. There is no point in spewing
> an E_DEPRECATED on get_magic_quotes_gpc(). Such warnings should be for
> people actually using a deprecated feature, not for functions that che
19 matches
Mail list logo
