On Jun 3, 2011, at 4:43 AM, Derick Rethans der...@php.net wrote:
On Fri, 3 Jun 2011, Stas Malyshev wrote:
- a call to vote is easily drowned out on the ML with all the noise
I read the same ML as you do :) Using threaded email client it is very
easy to separate new threads and see calls for
On Jun 4, 2011, at 3:07 AM, Pierre Joye wrote:
On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 5:46 AM, Stas Malyshev smalys...@sugarcrm.com
wrote:
[VOTE] is a good idea, let's make it [VOTE].
There is no plugin used for it yet, and that's my problem with it.
Well, votes aren't announced yet either :)
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 4:18 PM, Zeev Suraski z...@zend.com wrote:
Some of you may have followed the twitter conversation that Pierre and I had
at the end of last week; In my opinion, this dry (or partially wet) run that
we had in the last few days of a voting process pointed to several
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 17:20, Pierre Joye pierre@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 4:18 PM, Zeev Suraski z...@zend.com wrote:
Some of you may have followed the twitter conversation that Pierre and I had
at the end of last week; In my opinion, this dry (or partially wet) run
that
On Jun 5, 2011, at 8:20 AM, Pierre Joye wrote:
I'd to say that I'm very happy to finally see such discussions
happening, let sort the base (99% is done by our existing RFC about
release process, let adopt it already!) and move on with 5.4.
This is a prime example of what we're talking
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 5:46 PM, Hannes Magnusson
hannes.magnus...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 17:20, Pierre Joye pierre@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 4:18 PM, Zeev Suraski z...@zend.com wrote:
Some of you may have followed the twitter conversation that Pierre and I
On 2011-06-05, Pierre Joye pierre@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 5:52 PM, Philip Olson phi...@roshambo.org wrote:
I'd to say that I'm very happy to finally see such discussions
happening, let sort the base (99% is done by our existing RFC about
release process, let adopt it
On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 5:46 AM, Stas Malyshev smalys...@sugarcrm.com wrote:
[VOTE] is a good idea, let's make it [VOTE].
There is no plugin used for it yet, and that's my problem with it.
Well, votes aren't announced yet either :) I'll try to get it set up ASAP
and see how it works, before
On Jun 4, 2011, at 3:07 AM, Pierre Joye wrote:
On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 5:46 AM, Stas Malyshev smalys...@sugarcrm.com wrote:
[VOTE] is a good idea, let's make it [VOTE].
There is no plugin used for it yet, and that's my problem with it.
Well, votes aren't announced yet either :) I'll try
04, 2011 9:30 AM
To: Pierre Joye
Cc: Stas Malyshev; Derick Rethans; PHP Internals
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Voting does not belong on the wiki! (Was: [PHP-DEV]
5.4 moving forward)
On Jun 4, 2011, at 3:07 AM, Pierre Joye wrote:
On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 5:46 AM, Stas Malyshev smalys...@sugarcrm.com
hi Philip,
On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 3:29 PM, Philip Olson phi...@roshambo.org wrote:
- RFC: Request For Comments
Thanks for the reminder. But RFC got approved at some point as well.
See the numerous W3C RFCs for some known examples.
And while doing so, not revert to a vote (RFV?) simply
Hi!
Please keep them in the wiki as we planed to do. THere are plugins and
it is very easy to manage, allows per section voting etc.
I've installed voting plugin, see description here:
http://www.dokuwiki.org/plugin:doodle2
and example how it looks here at the end (login required to vote):
right, that's the one I was willing to install as well, great that you
did it! Thanks :)
On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 7:58 PM, Stas Malyshev smalys...@sugarcrm.com wrote:
Hi!
Please keep them in the wiki as we planed to do. THere are plugins and
it is very easy to manage, allows per section voting
On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 19:58, Stas Malyshev smalys...@sugarcrm.com wrote:
Hi!
Please keep them in the wiki as we planed to do. THere are plugins and
it is very easy to manage, allows per section voting etc.
I've installed voting plugin, see description here:
Why doesnt voting happen using a poll/voting engine. Written in (gasp) PHP!
(although soon PJSON)
On Jun 3, 2011, at 1:03 AM, Stas Malyshev smalys...@sugarcrm.com wrote:
Hi!
Voting on the wiki? Yuck. If you want participation, do it here on the
mailinglist and store the record in the
Have you guys considered doodle.com? I think you are all stressing way too
much over the voting process. When a vote is closed you can then transfer
the decision to the RFC.
Drak
On 3 June 2011 14:12, Pierre Joye pierre@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 10:22 AM, Derick Rethans
Hi!
That is subjective. And even with a threaded client, if there are 80+
new messages then the call for vote is drowned out. *Requiring*
There was never 80+ new messages on different topics on the list. There
are 3-4 topics max, if you not count commit messages. Each of them can
contain
17 matches
Mail list logo
