On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 9:37 AM, Zdenek Styblik
wrote:
[...]
>
> I've logged SF.net ticket for this. Link:
> https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=95200&atid=610550
>
> Z.
Grh! Correct link:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=3606181&group_id=95200&atid=610550
Sorry about that,
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 12:57 PM, Zdenek Styblik
wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 12:42 PM, Liebig, Holger
> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Hi,
>>> >
>>> > The lib/ipmi_sdr.c above comment "/* SR2300, non-redundant, PSx present
>>> */"
>>> > The missing break is intentional due to redundancy, right?
>>>
>>> [L
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 12:42 PM, Liebig, Holger
wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > The lib/ipmi_sdr.c above comment "/* SR2300, non-redundant, PSx present
>> */"
>> > The missing break is intentional due to redundancy, right?
>>
>> [Liebig, Holger]
>> I would say no, but who knows for sure without Int
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > The lib/ipmi_sdr.c above comment "/* SR2300, non-redundant, PSx present
> */"
> > The missing break is intentional due to redundancy, right?
>
> [Liebig, Holger]
> I would say no, but who knows for sure without Intel documentation about
> the OEM SDR's in this particular quite
>
> Hi,
>
> The lib/ipmi_sdr.c above comment "/* SR2300, non-redundant, PSx present */"
> The missing break is intentional due to redundancy, right?
[Liebig, Holger]
I would say no, but who knows for sure without Intel documentation about the
OEM SDR's in this particular quite old system from
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 3:02 PM, Ales Ledvinka wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The lib/ipmi_sdr.c above comment "/* SR2300, non-redundant, PSx present */"
> The missing break is intentional due to redundancy, right?
>
Hello,
yes, it seems like it(= it is not a bug). One line of comment wouldn't
hurt, I'd say(I
Hi,
The lib/ipmi_sdr.c above comment "/* SR2300, non-redundant, PSx present */"
The missing break is intentional due to redundancy, right?
--
Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS,
MVC, Windo
