Rename it to be ipv6; a very strong preference.
It is hard to take .ng seriously in 2003; perhaps it always was
hard to take .ng seriously.
Tom Petch
-Original Message-
From: Bob Hinden Margaret Wasserman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL
B
A or C would be acceptable were they to happen but I think they will
not in a reasonable timescale (and as an engineer, I want something
that I can use:-)
In passing, I am one of the third, not the two thirds, and do accept
that we have rough consensus.
Tom Petch
-Original Message
NO -- Do not deprecate site-local unicast addressing.
They are needed for access control in enterprise (as opposed to
home/private use) networks
Tom Petch
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Margaret Wasserman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 01
of the
enterprise management. If ISPs share a resource, which in a sense
every ISP does because there is a single world-wide BGP RIB, then that
is the responsibility of the ISP.
So multi-homing is a must.
Tom Petch, Network Consultant
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Kurt Erik Lindqvist
